Beyond robotic wastelands of time: Abandoned pedagogical agents and new pedalled pedagogies

Chatbots, known as pedagogical agents in educational settings, have a long history of use, beginning with Alan Turing's work. Since then online chatbots have become embedded into the fabric of technology. Yet understandings of these technologies are inchoate and often untheorised. Integration of chatbots into educational settings over the past five years suggests an increase in interest in the ways in which chatbots might be adopted and adapted for teaching and learning. This article draws on historical literature and theories that to date have largely been ignored in order to (re)contextualise two studies that used responsive evaluation to examine the use of pedagogical agents in education. Findings suggest that emotional interactions with pedagogical agents are intrinsic to a user's sense of trust, and that truthfulness, personalisation and emotional engagement are vital when using pedagogical agents to enhance online learning. Such findings need to be considered in the light of ways in which notions of learning are being redefined in the academy and the extent to which new literacies and new technologies are being pedalled as pedagogies in ways that undermine what higher education is, is for, and what learning means.

[1]  George Veletsianos,et al.  Pedagogical Agents , 2013 .

[2]  Sabine Payr The virtual university's faculty: An overview of educational agents , 2003, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[3]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Siân Bayne What's the matter with ‘technology-enhanced learning’? , 2015 .

[5]  Nick Yee,et al.  The Demographics, Motivations, and Derived Experiences of Users of Massively Multi-User Online Graphical Environments , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[6]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[7]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[8]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Virtual research assistants: Replacing human interviewers by automated avatars in virtual worlds , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  H. Brewer Religion without revelation , 1958 .

[10]  Peter-Paul Verbeek,et al.  Trusting Our Selves to Technology , 2010 .

[11]  Marika Lüders,et al.  Too Many Facebook “Friends”? Content Sharing and Sociability Versus the Need for Privacy in Social Network Sites , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Stefan Herbrechter Posthumanism, subjectivity, autobiography , 2012 .

[13]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  The more humanlike, the better? How speech type and users' cognitive style affect social responses to computers , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Corina Yen,et al.  The Man Who Lied to His Laptop: What Machines Teach Us About Human Relationships , 2010 .

[15]  David J. H. Burden,et al.  'It's Almost like Talking to a Person': Student Disclosure to Pedagogical Agents in Sensitive Settings , 2013, Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn..

[16]  Poornima Madhavan,et al.  A note of caution regarding anthropomorphism in HCI agents , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Jean Talbot,et al.  Interface design and emotions experienced on B2C Web sites: Empirical testing of a research model , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  R. W. Lucas,et al.  Psychiatrists and a Computer as Interrogators of Patients with Alcohol-Related Illnesses: A Comparison , 1977, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[19]  A. L. Baylor,et al.  A Social-Cognitive Framework for Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions , 2006 .

[20]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Transformed social interaction in mediated interpersonal communication , 2008 .

[21]  Jack T. Dennerlein,et al.  FRUSTRATING COMPUTERS USERS INCREASES EXPOSURE TO PHYSICAL FACTORS , 2002 .

[22]  Neil Frude The robot heritage , 1984 .

[23]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  Conceptualization and Measurement of Reported Self-Disclosure. , 1976 .

[24]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF TRUST AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SELF‐DISCLOSURE , 1977 .

[25]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent's image , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[27]  D. Haraway,et al.  A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century , 2013 .

[28]  Susanne van Mulken,et al.  The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  G. Clarebout,et al.  Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning , 2011 .

[30]  T. Oguchi Goal-based analysis of willingness of self-disclosure , 1991 .

[31]  Ivan D. Brown,et al.  The Intimate Machine , 1984 .

[32]  Mel Slater,et al.  The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment , 2003, CHI '03.

[33]  Li Gong,et al.  How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  P. Jandrić,et al.  The Intimate Machine – 30 years on , 2015 .

[35]  J T Lessler,et al.  Mode of interview and reporting of sensitive issues: design and implementation of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing. , 1997, NIDA research monograph.

[36]  J. Steel,et al.  Interpersonal Correlates of Trust and Self-Disclosure , 1991 .

[37]  Daniel P. Berrar,et al.  Computing machinery and creativity: lessons learned from the Turing test , 2013, Kybernetes.

[38]  R. Moreno,et al.  Students' choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity , 2006 .

[39]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  The art of computer conversation : a new medium for communication , 1984 .

[40]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Desirable Characteristics of Learning Companions , 2007, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[41]  Charles Miller,et al.  Conversing with pedagogical agents: A phenomenological exploration of interacting with digital entities , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..