Comparison of 3-Month Stroke Disability and Quality of Life across Modified Rankin Scale Categories

Background and Purpose: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 has been used to define “good outcome” while stroke patients with mRS 3 are grouped with mRS 4-6 as having “poor outcome.” Long-term data comparing quality of life (QoL), particularly across the mRS 2, 3, and 4 subgroups, are sparse. Methods: Participants in the Interventional Management of Stroke 3 (IMS3) trial with documented 3-month mRS, functional disability (Barthel index [BI]), and self-reported EQ5D-3L QoL questionnaires at 3 months after stroke were included. EQ5D-3L summary indices were calculated using published utility weights for the US population. BI and EQ5D-3L indices were compared across mRS categories using multiple pairwise comparisons with appropriate alpha error corrections. Results: Four hundred twenty-three patients were included (mean age 64 ± 13 years, median baseline NIHSS 16 [IQR 12-19], mean BI 84.1 ± 25.3, and mean EQ5D-3L index 0.73 ± 0.24). While significant differences in BI were observed across mRS categories, QoL in the mRS 2 and 3 categories was similar. Based on BI and EQ5D-3L index, mRS 3 status was more similar to mRS 2 than to mRS 4 status, and large heterogeneity in the mRS 3 group was observed. Conclusions: Ischemic stroke patients who achieve mRS 2 and 3 functional outcomes seem to have similar health-related QoL scores. mRS 0-3, rather than 0-2, should be considered a good outcome category in moderate to severe ischemic stroke.

[1]  D. Feeny,et al.  Self-Reported Health Status of the General Adult U.S. Population as Assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index , 2005, Medical care.

[2]  Jeffrey A. Johnson,et al.  Valuation of EuroQOL (EQ-5D) Health States in an Adult US Sample , 1998, PharmacoEconomics.

[3]  D. Cella,et al.  Agreement Between Responses From Community-Dwelling Persons With Stroke and Their Proxies on the NIH Neurological Quality of Life (Neuro-QoL) Short Forms. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  A. Pickard,et al.  Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke , 2014, Quality of Life Research.

[5]  Stephen Joel Coons,et al.  US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model , 2005, Medical care.

[6]  Michael D Hill,et al.  Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Jan Potter,et al.  Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale Across Multiple Raters: Benefits of a Structured Interview , 2005, Stroke.

[8]  Y. Hsieh,et al.  Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[9]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA.

[10]  Jeffrey L Saver,et al.  Quantifying the Value of Stroke Disability Outcomes: WHO Global Burden of Disease Project Disability Weights for Each Level of the Modified Rankin Scale , 2009, Stroke.

[11]  Nan Luo,et al.  Valuations of EQ-5D Health States: Are the United States and United Kingdom Different? , 2005, Medical care.

[12]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Functional Status Three Months after the First Ischemic Stroke Is Associated with Long-Term Outcome: Data from a Community-Based Cohort , 2014, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[13]  Christopher S Coffey,et al.  2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2015, Stroke.

[14]  J. Grotta,et al.  Adopting a Patient-Centered Approach to Primary Outcome Analysis of Acute Stroke Trials Using a Utility-Weighted Modified Rankin Scale , 2015, Stroke.

[15]  R. Rosenfeld Patients , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[16]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Bloch,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.