Performance studies of a low heat rejection engine operated on non-volatile vegetable oils with exhaust gas recirculation

During recent decades, considerable effort has been expended world-wide to reduce dependency on petroleum fuels for power generation and transportation through the search for suitable alternative fuels that are environmentally friendly. In this respect, vegetable oils are a promising alternative to diesel fuel. However, the high viscosity, poor volatility and cold flow characteristics of vegetable oils can cause some problems such as injector coking, severe engine deposits, filter gumming and piston ring sticking and thickening of lubrication from long-term use in diesel engines. These problems can be eliminated or minimised by transesterification of the vegetable oils to form monoesters. Although transesterification improves the fuel properties of vegetable oil, the viscosity and volatility of biodiesel are still worse than those of petroleum diesel fuel. The performance of a diesel engine with such biodiesel operation can be improved further with the concept of the low heat rejection (LHR) engine. In the LHR engine, combustion surfaces on the pistons, cylinder walls and valves can be coated with ceramic materials. The objective of this study was to apply the LHR engine concept for improving engine performance when either honge biodiesel, known as honge oil methyl ester (HOME), or neem biodiesel, known as neem oil methyl ester (NOME) oils was used as an alternative fuel. For this purpose, experiments were conducted on a single cylinder, four-stroke, direct injection, water-cooled compression ignition engine using diesel, HOME and NOME oils at different injection timings of 19, 23 and 27° before top dead centre (BTDC) with and without the induction of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). The percentage of EGR was varied from 5 to 20% in steps of 5%. The results showed that specific fuel consumption and brake thermal efficiency were improved for both of the biodiesel fuels in the LHR engine. An EGR of 10% resulted in better performance with trade-off between oxides of nitrogen and hydrocarbons/carbon monoxide emissions and hence 10% EGR is taken as the best of the range from 5 to 20%. However, readings with other EGR ratios are not reported.

[1]  Tahsin Engin,et al.  Effects of thermal barrier coating on gas emissions and performance of a LHR engine with different injection timings and valve adjustments , 2006 .

[2]  Ayhan Demirbas,et al.  Progress and recent trends in biofuels , 2007 .

[3]  A. Alkidas.  Performance and Emissions Achievements with an Uncooled Heavy-Duty, Single-Cylinder Diesel Engine , 1989 .

[4]  Michael F. J. Brunt,et al.  Calculation of Heat Release in Direct Injection Diesel Engines , 1999 .

[5]  C. L. Peterson,et al.  Durability Testing of Transesterified Winter Rape Oil (Brassica Napus L.) as Fuel in Small Bore, Multi-Cylinder, DI, CI Engines , 1991 .

[6]  Gerhard Vellguth,et al.  Performance of Vegetable Oils and their Monoesters as Fuels for Diesel Engines , 1983 .

[7]  Avinash Kumar Agarwal,et al.  Performance and emissions characteristics of Jatropha oil (preheated and blends) in a direct injection compression ignition engine , 2007 .

[8]  C. A. Amann.  Promises and Challenges of the Low-Heat-Rejection Diesel , 1988 .

[9]  Shailendra Sinha,et al.  Effect of EGR on the exhaust gas temperature and exhaust opacity in compression ignition engines , 2004 .

[10]  J. V. Gerpen,et al.  The effect of biodiesel oxidation on engine performance and emissions , 2001 .

[11]  Avinash Kumar Agarwal,et al.  Experimental investigation of control of NOx emissions in biodiesel-fueled compression ignition engine , 2006 .

[12]  Arvind Atreya,et al.  An Experimental Heat Release Rate Analysis of a Diesel Engine Operating Under Steady State Conditions , 1997 .

[13]  Wallace R. Wade,et al.  Fuel economy opportunities with an uncooled Dl diesel engine , 1984 .

[14]  M. Sharma,et al.  Prospects of biodiesel production from vegetable oils in India , 2005 .

[15]  N. S. Mavinahally,et al.  Injection characteristics that improve performance of ceramic-coated diesel engines , 1999 .

[16]  Avinash Kumar Agarwal,et al.  Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines , 2007 .

[17]  Spencer C. Sorenson,et al.  Combustion of Soybean Oil Methyl Ester in a Direct Injection Diesel Engine , 1993 .

[18]  G. Abd-Alla,et al.  Using exhaust gas recirculation in internal combustion engines: a review , 2002 .

[19]  Donald W. Lyons,et al.  Experimental Analysis and Performance Improvement of a Single Cylinder Direct Injection Turbocharged Low Heat Rejection Engine , 1993 .

[20]  D. Tomazic,et al.  Cooled EGR - A Must or an Option for 2002/04 , 2002 .

[21]  V. Rocco,et al.  D.I. Diesel Engine In-Cylinder Pressure Data Analysis Under T.D.C. Setting Error , 1993 .

[22]  Charles A. Amann,et al.  Cylinder-Pressure measurement and Its Use in Engine Research , 1985 .

[23]  Hua Zhao,et al.  Effects of EGR on heat release in diesel combustion , 1998 .

[24]  Minnamari Vippola,et al.  Characterization of modified thick thermal barrier coatings , 2003, Thermal Spray 2003: Proceedings from the International Thermal Spray Conference.

[25]  Hüseyin Serdar Yücesu,et al.  The potential of using vegetable oil fuels as fuel for diesel engines , 2001 .

[26]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[27]  R. S. Hosmath,et al.  Performance and emission characteristics of a DI compression ignition engine operated on Honge, Jatropha and sesame oil methyl esters , 2008 .

[28]  Yasufumi Yoshimoto,et al.  Reduction of NOx and Smoke Emissions in a Diesel Engine Fueled by Biodiesel Emulsion Combined with EGR , 2001 .

[29]  P. Tamilporai,et al.  Low Heat Rejection Engines – An Overview , 2003 .

[30]  A. Ramesh,et al.  Parametric studies for improving the performance of a Jatropha oil-fuelled compression ignition engine , 2006 .

[31]  Lei Shi,et al.  Effects of EGR on combustion process of DI diesel engine during cold start , 2008 .