Histologic and Molecular Characterization of Non−Small Cell Lung Carcinoma With Discordant ROS1 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Introduction: ROS1 immunohistochemical (IHC) positivity requires follow-up with confirmatory testing such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Identifying predictive characteristics of false positive ROS1 IHC cases could aid in optimizing testing algorithms, decrease testing costs and preserve tissue. Materials and Methods: Retrospective results were retrieved for 2054 patients with non−small cell lung carcinoma submitted to our laboratory for molecular testing. Reflex ROS1 FISH was done on all ROS1 immunoreactive cases using ROS1 D4D6 antibody. Staining intensity and histo-score was recorded for all ROS1 immunoreactive cases. Results of any additional molecular testing (KRAS, BRAF, EGFR, ALK FISH, RET FISH, MET FISH) were also tabulated. Results: ROS1 immunoreactivity was seen in 305/2054 (14.8%) cases. Immunoreactivity was weak in majority of the cases with only 4.6% cases having an histo-score >100 and 5.9% of cases had moderate staining intensity. FISH was negative in 99% (302/305) cases with any degree of IHC expression (discordant cases) while 3 cases were positive by FISH. Diffuse strong IHC staining in greater than 90% of the tumor was noted in 6 cases, 3 (0.98%) of which were confirmed to have ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. The discordant cases had significantly higher rates of EGFR mutations (P<0.0005) in comparison to ROS1 IHC negative cases, were seen more often in adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma (P<0.0005) with lepidic and acinar patterns, and more likely to occur in primary lung carcinomas (P<0.0005). Conclusions: False positive ROS1 immunoreactivity was very frequent, occurred more commonly in primary NSCLC cases with acinar and/or lepidic histologies and was more likely in EGFR mutated cases. Using higher positivity thresholds for ROS1 IHC and incorporating the histologic and molecular correlates into algorithmic strategies could result in increased specificity and clinical utility of ROS1 IHC assay.

[1]  Z. Song,et al.  Evaluation of a new diagnostic immunohistochemistry approach for ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2020, Lung cancer.

[2]  Qiye He,et al.  Comparison of next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry analysis for targeted therapy-related genomic status in lung cancer patients. , 2019, Journal of thoracic disease.

[3]  R. Riedel,et al.  Comparison of in Situ and Extraction-Based Methods for the Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in Solid Tumors. , 2019, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.

[4]  C. Marquette,et al.  Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Assay (SP384) for Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in a Large Cohort of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients. , 2019, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[5]  M. Ahn,et al.  Histopathologic characteristics of advanced-stage ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancers. , 2019, Pathology, research and practice.

[6]  J. Zhao,et al.  A genomic and clinicopathological study of non‐small‐cell lung cancers with discordant ROS1 gene status by fluorescence in‐situ hybridisation and immunohistochemical analysis , 2018, Histopathology.

[7]  Benjamin Solomon,et al.  Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2018, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[8]  B. Sundaram,et al.  Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Patients With Lung Cancer for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of the College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecula , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  A. Shaw,et al.  Recent Advances in Targeting ROS1 in Lung Cancer , 2017, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[10]  F. López-Ríos,et al.  Identification of ALK, ROS1, and RET Fusions by a Multiplexed mRNA-Based Assay in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Samples from Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients. , 2017, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  A. Nicholson,et al.  A Validation Study for the Use of ROS1 Immunohistochemical Staining in Screening for ROS1 Translocations in Lung Cancer , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[12]  Yoon-La Choi,et al.  ALK, ROS1 and RET rearrangements in lung squamous cell carcinoma are very rare. , 2016, Lung cancer.

[13]  J. Mate,et al.  ROS1 copy number alterations are frequent in non-small cell lung cancer , 2016, Oncotarget.

[14]  P. Wei,et al.  Detection of lung adenocarcinoma with ROS1 rearrangement by IHC, FISH, and RT-PCR and analysis of its clinicopathologic features , 2015, OncoTargets and therapy.

[15]  Yan-Ze Jin,et al.  Frequent aerogenous spread with decreased E-cadherin expression of ROS1-rearranged lung cancer predicts poor disease-free survival. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[16]  S. Fox,et al.  Comparison of Methods in the Detection of ALK and ROS1 Rearrangements in Lung Cancer , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[17]  F. Hirsch,et al.  ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Among Major Genotypes of Non—Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2014, Clinical lung cancer.

[18]  A. Warth,et al.  ROS1 expression and translocations in non‐small‐cell lung cancer: clinicopathological analysis of 1478 cases , 2014, Histopathology.

[19]  S. Lim,et al.  Screening of ROS1 Rearrangements in Lung Adenocarcinoma by Immunohistochemistry and Comparison with ALK Rearrangements , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  T. Kohno,et al.  Immunohistochemical detection of ROS1 is useful for identifying ROS1 rearrangements in lung cancers , 2014, Modern Pathology.

[21]  E. Brambilla,et al.  On the relevance of a testing algorithm for the detection of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. , 2014, Lung cancer.

[22]  P. Jänne,et al.  ROS1 Immunohistochemistry for Detection of ROS1-Rearranged Lung Adenocarcinomas , 2013, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[23]  T. Gu,et al.  Analysis of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase ROS1-Positive Tumors in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Identification of a FIG-ROS1 Fusion , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  A. Warth,et al.  ALK-Testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in-situ Hybridisation (FISH)?: Statement of the Germany Society for Pathology (DGP) and the Working Group Thoracic Oncology (AIO) of the German Cancer Society e.V. (Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellsch , 2017, Lung cancer.

[25]  Weiya Wang,et al.  Detection of ROS 1 translocation in lung adenocarcinoma by IHC , FISH and RT-PCR and its clinicopathologic features , 2017 .

[26]  Renato Martins,et al.  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2017, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[27]  S. Jang,et al.  ROS1 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase, a Druggable Target, is Frequently Overexpressed in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas Via Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.