Measuring Success in Obesity Prevention: A Synthesis of Health Promotion Switzerland's Long-Term Monitoring and Evaluation Strategy

Aims: Since 2007, Health Promotion Switzerland has implemented a national priority program for a healthy body weight. This article provides insight into the methodological challenges and results of the program evaluation. Methods: Evaluation of the long-term program required targeted monitoring and evaluation projects addressing different outcome levels. The evaluation was carried out according to the Swiss Model for Outcome Classification (SMOC), a model designed to classify the effects of health promotion and prevention efforts. Results: The results presented in this article emphasize both content and methods. The national program successfully achieved outcomes on many different levels within complex societal structures. The evaluation system built around the SMOC enabled assessment of program progress and the development of key indicators. However, it is not possible to determine definitively to what extent the national program helped stabilize the prevalence of obesity in Switzerland. Conclusion: The model has shown its utility in providing a basis for evaluation and monitoring of the national program. Continuous analysis of data from evaluation and monitoring has made it possible to check the plausibility of suspected causal relationships as well as to establish an overall perspective and assessment of effectiveness supported by a growing body of evidence.

[1]  Lawrence W. Green,et al.  Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach , 2004 .

[2]  D. Nutbeam Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century , 2000 .

[3]  A. Chiolero,et al.  Obesity in Switzerland: do estimates depend on how body mass index has been assessed? , 2008, Swiss medical weekly.

[4]  Johannes Brug,et al.  The European charter for counteracting obesity: A late but important step towards action. Observations on the WHO-Europe ministerial conference, Istanbul, November 15–17, 2006 , 2007, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[5]  J. Mayne Contribution Analysis: Addressing Cause and Eff ect , 2017 .

[6]  J. Inchley,et al.  Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study protocol: Background, methodology and mandatory items for the 2013/14 survey , 2014 .

[7]  Jodi B. Segal,et al.  Childhood Obesity Prevention Programs: Comparative Effectiveness Review and Meta-Analysis Executive Summary , 2013 .

[8]  A. Spoerri,et al.  Modelling the results of health promotion activities in Switzerland: development of the Swiss Model for Outcome Classification in Health Promotion and Prevention. , 2008, Health promotion international.

[9]  Franco Sassi,et al.  Obesity and the Economics of Prevention: Fit Not Fat , 2010 .

[10]  Shiriki K. Kumanyika,et al.  A Systems-Oriented Multilevel Framework for Addressing Obesity in the 21st Century , 2009, Preventing chronic disease.

[11]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use , 2010 .

[12]  Außerschulische Gesundheitsförderung bei jungen Frauen , 2013, Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung.

[13]  H. Stamm,et al.  Excess weight among children and adolescents in Switzerland--prevalence and correlates for the early 2010s. , 2014, Swiss medical weekly.

[14]  D. Booth,et al.  Taking responsibility for complexity How implementation can achieve results in the face of complex problems , 2011 .

[15]  Union Européenne,et al.  Health at a Glance: Europe 2020 , 2020, Health at a Glance: Europe.

[16]  Sue C. Funnell Developing and using a program theory matrix for program evaluation and performance monitoring , 2000 .