Preferences, Identity, and Competition: Predicting Tie Strength from Demographic Data

This research examines the combined influence of three causal mechanisms shaping interpersonal dynamics. Sharing a demographic characteristic has been shown to strengthen a relationship between people. The initial explanation for this positive effect emphasized the importance of individual preferences for social contact. Similar people share common interests, which makes them more attractive as exchange partners. More recent explanations have highlighted the important role of identification and competition. Identification increases the tendency for strong ties to develop among similar people, while competition reduces that tendency. I argue that tie strength is a function of all three mechanisms: a baseline level of interpersonal attraction, a positive identification effect, and a negative competition adjustment. Identification and competition vary with the number of people sharing the focal attribute to define a predictable association between sharing the focal attribute and the strength of a network connection. Predictions are tested with tenure and tie-strength data from a small research and development firm. Analysis indicates that having the same tenure has the predicted effect on communication frequency. The implications of the findings are discussed for homophily research in particular and demography research in general.

[1]  M. Mizruchi.  Similarity of Political Behavior Among Large American Corporations , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[3]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[4]  H. Ibarra.  Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[5]  F. Reid.  Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory , 1987 .

[6]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  H. Ibarra.  Race, Opportunity, And Diversity Of Social Circles In Managerial Networks , 1995 .

[8]  B. Campbell.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[9]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life , 1977 .

[10]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  At the Margins: A Distinctiveness Approach to the Social Identity and Social Networks of Underrepresented Groups , 1998 .

[11]  C. Fischer.  To Dwell Among Friends , 1982 .

[12]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Salience, Heterogeneity and Consolidation of Parameters: Civilizing Blau's Primitive Theory , 1983 .

[13]  Herminia Ibarra,et al.  Paving an alternative route : Gender differences in managerial networks , 1997 .

[14]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[15]  B. Efron.  Jackknife‐After‐Bootstrap Standard Errors and Influence Functions , 1992 .

[16]  S. Stewman.  Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[17]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Relational equilibrium in a social topology , 1979 .

[18]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[19]  M. Hogg,et al.  Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation , 1985 .

[20]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[21]  E. Laumann.  Prestige And Association In An Urban Community , 1966 .

[22]  William Simpson,et al.  The Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP) , 2001 .

[23]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[24]  B. Lawrence.  The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[25]  H. Rao,et al.  The Demography of Corporations and Industries , 1999 .

[26]  J. T. Polzer,et al.  Capitalizing on Diversity: Interpersonal Congruence in Small Work Groups , 2002 .

[27]  R. Ely.  The Power In Demography: Women'S Social Constructions Of Gender Identity At Work , 1995 .

[28]  James D. Westphal,et al.  How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards , 2000 .

[29]  R. Burt.  A note on social capital and network content , 1997 .

[30]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[31]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity , 1992 .

[32]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Effects of household sex composition on the salience of one's gender in the spontaneous self-concept. , 1979 .

[34]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Attraction, Personal Attraction, and Self-Categorization-, A Field Study , 1991 .

[35]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .

[36]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  Economic concentration and corporate political behavior: A cross-industry comparison , 1988 .

[37]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup relations and group solidarity : Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction , 1996 .

[38]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[39]  Stanislav D. Dobrev,et al.  Dynamics of Niche Width and Resource Partitioning1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Demography: Implications for Management , 1985 .

[41]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[42]  M. Brewer.  The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[43]  ReagansRay,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity , 2001 .

[44]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Subjective Uncertainty and Intergroup Discrimination in the Minimal Group Situation , 1999 .

[45]  Morroe Berger,et al.  Freedom and control in modern society , 1954 .

[46]  R. Kanter.  Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  D. Byrne.  Attitudes and Attraction , 1969 .

[48]  Jon Olson,et al.  Rationality and Equity in Professional Networks: Gender and Race as Factors in the Stratification of Interorganizational Systems , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams , 2004 .

[50]  Lynn A. Isabella,et al.  Mentoring Alternatives: The Role of Peer Relationships in Career Development , 1985 .

[51]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[52]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[53]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Robin J. Ely,et al.  The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. , 1994 .

[55]  M. Hogg.  Group Cohesiveness: A Critical Review and Some New Directions , 1993 .

[56]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Capitalizing on Diversity: Interpersonal Congruence in Small Work Groups , 2001 .

[57]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[58]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[59]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[60]  Christopher D. Zatzick,et al.  When is More Better? The Effects of Racial Composition on Voluntary Turnover , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .

[62]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  Demographic Differences in Organizations: Current Research and Future Directions , 1999 .

[63]  J. Lincoln,et al.  Work and Friendship Ties in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Relational Networks , 1979 .

[64]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[65]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[66]  Jonathan H. Turner,et al.  Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception and Action.Ronald S. Burt , 1985 .

[67]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes , 2001 .