Validation of a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (mfEIT) system KHU Mark1: impedance spectroscopy and time-difference imaging

Validation and interpretation of reconstructed images using a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (mfEIT) requires a conductivity phantom including imaging objects with known complex conductivity (sigma + iomegaepsilon) spectra. We describe imaging experiments using the recently developed mfEIT system called the KHU Mark1 with the frequency range of 10 Hz to 500 kHz. Using a bio-impedance spectroscopy (BIS) system, we first measured complex conductivity spectra of different imaging objects including saline, agar, polyacrylamide, TX151, animal hide gelatin, banana and cucumber. Based on an analysis of how conductivity and permittivity affect measured complex boundary voltages, we suggested a new complex version of a multi-frequency time-difference image reconstruction algorithm. Imaging experiments were conducted to produce time-difference images of the objects at multiple frequencies using the proposed algorithm. Images of a conductor (stainless steel) and an insulator (acrylic plastic) were used to set a common scale bar to display all images. Comparing reconstructed time-difference images at multiple frequencies with measured complex conductivity spectra, we found that they showed an overall similarity in terms of changes in complex conductivity values with respect to frequency. However, primarily due to the limitation of the difference imaging algorithm, we suggest that multi-frequency time-difference images must be interpreted in terms of relative contrast changes with respect to frequency. We propose further imaging studies using biological tissues of known complex conductivity spectra and using human subjects to find clinical applications of the mfEIT system.

[1]  Richard C. Tozer,et al.  Conductivity and permittivity images from an induced current electrical impedance tomography system , 1994 .

[2]  B G Steinbach,et al.  Use of a modified polysaccharide gel in developing a realistic breast phantom for MRI. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  E. Madsen,et al.  Tissue-mimicking gelatin-agar gels for use in magnetic resonance imaging phantoms. , 1988, Medical physics.

[4]  R H Bayford,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography spectroscopy (EITS) for human head imaging. , 2003, Physiological measurement.

[5]  D. Djajaputra Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications , 2005 .

[6]  D S Holder,et al.  Some practical biological phantoms for calibrating multifrequency electrical impedance tomography. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[7]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  The Reconstruction Problem , 2017 .

[8]  D. Isaacson,et al.  A reconstruction algorithm for electrical impedance tomography data collected on rectangular electrode arrays , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  David S. Holder,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography : Methods, History and Applications , 2004 .

[10]  F J Lidgey,et al.  Development of a real-time adaptive current tomograph. , 1994, Physiological measurement.

[11]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Calibration methods for a multi-channel multi-frequency EIT system , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[12]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[13]  R H Bayford,et al.  Design and performance of the UCLH mark 1b 64 channel electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system, optimized for imaging brain function. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[14]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Multi-frequency EIT system with radially symmetric architecture: KHU Mark1 , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[15]  D S Holder,et al.  Use of polyacrylamide gels in a saline-filled tank to determine the linearity of the Sheffield Mark 1 electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system in measuring impedance disturbances. , 1994, Physiological measurement.

[16]  Ryan Halter,et al.  Design and implementation of a high frequency electrical impedance tomography system. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[17]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  David Isaacson,et al.  NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem , 1990, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[19]  Sverre Grimnes,et al.  Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics , 2000 .

[20]  R H Smallwood,et al.  Mk3.5: a modular, multi-frequency successor to the Mk3a EIS/EIT system. , 2001, Physiological measurement.