On the Performance of Optical Wireless Links Over Random Foggy Channels

Fog and dust are used to be considered as major performance degrading factors for free space optic (FSO) communication links. Despite the number of field measurements, performed in foggy environments during the last decades, most of the proposed channel attenuation models are deterministic, i.e., assumed the channel attenuation constant over time. Stochastic behavior of the channel is still understudied. In this paper, we investigate the probabilistic behavior of the FSO channel in fog and develop a new statistical model for the signal attenuation. Moreover, we derive a probability distribution function (PDF) for the channel state. Using this PDF, we study the FSO system performance considering various metrics including average signal-to-noise ratio, average bit error rate, channel capacity, and probability. of outage Closed form expressions are derived for the average SNR and outage probability. We found acceptable performance with moderate and light fog. However, under thick and dense fog, the system performance poorly deteriorates. Finally, we derived closed form expressions for the average attenuation-distance product and the link availability that will potentially be very helpful for network design and planning.

[1]  F. de Fornel,et al.  Measurement of Light attenuation in dense fog conditions for FSO applications , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[2]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Analysis of fog effects on terrestrial Free Space optical communication links , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[3]  Richard M. Heiberger,et al.  Statistical Analysis and Data Display: An Intermediate Course with Examples in S-Plus, R, and SAS , 2004 .

[4]  Reza Nasiri Mahalati,et al.  Effect of fog on free-space optical links employing imaging receivers. , 2012, Optics express.

[5]  G. Keiser Optical Fiber Communications , 1983 .

[6]  M. S. Awan,et al.  Selecting a distribution function for optical attenuation in dense continental fog conditions , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Emerging Technologies.

[8]  Z. Ghassemlooy,et al.  Modeling of Fog and Smoke Attenuation in Free Space Optical Communications Link Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions , 2013, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[9]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Digital Communication over Fading Channels: Simon/Digital Communications 2e , 2004 .

[10]  Eric C. Eisenberg,et al.  Optical attenuation in fog and clouds , 2001, SPIE ITCom.

[11]  A. Leon-Garcia,et al.  Probability, statistics, and random processes for electrical engineering , 2008 .

[12]  Songnian Fu,et al.  Performance comparison of different modulation formats over free-space optical (FSO) turbulence links with space diversity reception technique , 2009, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[13]  George K. Karagiannidis,et al.  BER Performance of FSO Links over Strong Atmospheric Turbulence Channels with Pointing Errors , 2008, IEEE Communications Letters.

[14]  J. Jobson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Data Analysis: Regression and Experimental Design , 1999 .

[15]  J. Ricklin,et al.  Free-space laser communications : principles and advances , 2008 .

[16]  M. Grábner,et al.  Multiple Scattering in Rain and Fog on Free-Space Optical Links , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[17]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[18]  E. Leitgeb,et al.  Continental Fog Attenuation Empirical Relationship from Measured Visibility Data , 2010 .

[19]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Beyond Beta: Other Continuous Families Of Distributions With Bounded Support And Applications , 2004 .

[20]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Outdoor FSO Communications Under Fog: Attenuation Modeling and Performance Evaluation , 2016, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[21]  E. Eisenberg,et al.  Optical attenuation in fog at a wavelength of 1.55 micrometers , 2008 .

[22]  Isaac I. Kim,et al.  Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications , 2001, SPIE Optics East.

[23]  S. Hranilovic,et al.  Outage Capacity Optimization for Free-Space Optical Links With Pointing Errors , 2007, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[24]  Subrat Kar,et al.  Capacity of free space optical links with spatial diversity and aperture averaging , 2014, 2014 27th Biennial Symposium on Communications (QBSC).

[25]  Dayong Zhou,et al.  Enlargement of Beam Coverage in FSO Mobile Network , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[26]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Experimental demonstration of outdoor 2.2 Tbps super-channel FSO transmission system , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[27]  Marzuki,et al.  Attenuation Analysis for Optical Wireless Link Measurements under Moderate Continental Fog Conditions at Milan and Graz , 2008, 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[28]  Xuan Tang,et al.  Compensating for Optical Beam Scattering and Wandering in FSO Communications , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[29]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  A Survey of the Challenges, Opportunities and Use of Multiple Antennas in Current and Future 5G Small Cell Base Stations , 2016, IEEE Access.

[30]  Ali Abedi,et al.  Propagation Engineering in Wireless Communications , 2011 .

[31]  Murat Uysal,et al.  Survey on Free Space Optical Communication: A Communication Theory Perspective , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.