Testing a New Structured Tool for Supporting Requirements’ Formulation and Decomposition

[1]  Lorenzo Fiorineschi,et al.  Abstraction framework to support students in learning creative conceptual design , 2018, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.

[2]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[3]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Mining customer product reviews for product development: A summarization process , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Effects of stress and effort on self-rated reports in experimental study of design activities , 2017, J. Intell. Manuf..

[5]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2009 .

[6]  Lorenzo Fiorineschi,et al.  A new conceptual design approach for overcoming the flaws of functional decomposition and morphology , 2016 .

[7]  Lorenzo Fiorineschi,et al.  Impact of Design Representations on Creativity of Design Outcomes , 2020, J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci..

[8]  Christian A. Rivera,et al.  A Requirement Engineering Framework for Electric Motors Development , 2018 .

[9]  Pieter E. Vermaas,et al.  My functional description is better! , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[10]  S. Sivaloganathan,et al.  A Survey of Design Philosophies, Models, Methods and Systems , 1996 .

[11]  Luis Gonzalez,et al.  NASA-TLX for predictability and measurability of instructional design models: case study in design methods , 2019, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[12]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[13]  Albert Albers,et al.  Different notions of function: results from an experiment on the analysis of an existing product , 2011 .

[14]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[15]  Claudia M. Eckert,et al.  That which is not form: The practical challenges in using functional concepts in design , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[16]  Vincent Cheutet,et al.  A framework to support requirements analysis in engineering design , 2012 .

[17]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[18]  Carlos Cardoso,et al.  Inspiration and Fixation: The Influences of Example Designs and System Properties in Idea Generation , 2017 .

[19]  Boris Eisenbart,et al.  An analysis of functional modeling approaches across disciplines , 2013, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[20]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Function in engineering: Benchmarking representations and models , 2017, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[21]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function — Behaviour — Structure Framework , 2004 .

[22]  Santosh Jagtap,et al.  Design creativity: refined method for novelty assessment , 2019 .

[23]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[24]  Klaus-Dieter Thoben,et al.  Qualitative Comparison of Requirements Elicitation Techniques that are Used to Collect Feedback Information about Product Use , 2014 .

[25]  Bojan Dolšak,et al.  A Necessity-Based Method for Product Requirement Elicitation and Classification , 2016 .

[26]  Nathan Crilly,et al.  The effect of explicit instructions in idea generation studies , 2018, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[27]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[28]  Marco Tomassini,et al.  Exploiting TRIZ Tools for enhancing systematic conceptual design activities , 2018 .

[29]  Frédéric Segonds,et al.  Requirement mining for model-based product design , 2016 .

[30]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Segmentation of design protocol using EEG , 2018, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.