Diffuse Optical Tomography Enhanced by Clustered Sparsity for Functional Brain Imaging

Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) is a noninvasive technique which measures hemodynamic changes in the tissue with near infrared light, which has been increasingly used to study brain functions. Due to the nature of light propagation in the tissue, the reconstruction problem is severely ill-posed. For linearized DOT problems, sparsity regularization has achieved promising results over conventional Tikhonov regularization in recent experimental research. As extensions to standard sparsity, it is widely known that structured sparsity based methods are often superior in terms of reconstruction accuracy, when the data follows some structures. In this paper, we exploit the structured sparsity of diffuse optical images. Based on the functional specialization of the brain, it is observed that the in vivo absorption changes caused by a specific brain function would be clustered in certain region(s) and not randomly distributed. Thus, a new algorithm is proposed for this clustered sparsity reconstruction (CSR). Results of numerical simulations and phantom experiments have demonstrated the superiority of the proposed method over the state-of-the-art methods. An example from human in vivo measurements further confirmed the advantages of the proposed CSR method.

[1]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Diffuse optical imaging of brain activation: approaches to optimizing image sensitivity, resolution, and accuracy , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Image reconstruction for diffuse optical tomography using sparsity regularization and expectation-maximization algorithm. , 2007, Optics express.

[3]  Fenghua Tian,et al.  Sparsity enhanced spatial resolution and depth localization in diffuse optical tomography , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[4]  Richard Baraniuk,et al.  Recovery of Clustered Sparse Signals from Compressive Measurements , 2009 .

[5]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Learning with structured sparsity , 2009, ICML '09.

[7]  Hanli Liu,et al.  Quantification of functional near infrared spectroscopy to assess cortical reorganization in children with cerebral palsy. , 2010, Optics express.

[8]  Yukio Yamada,et al.  Improvement of image quality of time-domain diffuse optical tomography with lp sparsity regularization , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[9]  A. Villringer,et al.  Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  Dianne P. O'Leary,et al.  The Use of the L-Curve in the Regularization of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems , 1993, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  Hanli Liu,et al.  Development of a compensation algorithm for accurate depth localization in diffuse optical tomography. , 2010, Optics letters.

[12]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Composite splitting algorithms for convex optimization , 2011, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[13]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[14]  Hamid Dehghani,et al.  Singular value decomposition based regularization prior to spectral mixing improves crosstalk in dynamic imaging using spectral diffuse optical tomography , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[15]  Britton Chance,et al.  Diffuse optical tomography with a priori anatomical information , 2003, SPIE BiOS.

[16]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Exact reconstruction formula for diffuse optical tomography using simultaneous sparse representation , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[17]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[18]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  The benefit of tree sparsity in accelerated MRI , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Britta K. Hölzel,et al.  Differential engagement of anterior cingulate and adjacent medial frontal cortex in adept meditators and non-meditators , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  The Benefit of Group Sparsity , 2009 .

[21]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Preconditioning for Accelerated Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares in Structured Sparsity Reconstruction , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  M. Glas,et al.  Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging , 2000 .

[23]  Jie Tian,et al.  An adaptive regularization parameter choice strategy for multispectral bioluminescence tomography. , 2011, Medical physics.

[24]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Compressive Sensing MRI with Wavelet Tree Sparsity , 2012, NIPS.

[25]  Randall L Barbour,et al.  Digital optical tomography system for dynamic breast imaging. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[26]  A. Yodh,et al.  Diffuse optics for tissue monitoring and tomography , 2010, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[27]  Turgut Durduran,et al.  Compressed sensing in diffuse optical tomography. , 2010, Optics express.

[28]  S. Arridge,et al.  Optical tomography: forward and inverse problems , 2009, 0907.2586.

[29]  David A Boas,et al.  Diffuse optical imaging of the whole head. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.

[30]  Volkan Cevher,et al.  Model-Based Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[31]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  O(1) Algorithms for Overlapping Group Sparsity , 2014, 2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[32]  Jean-Philippe Vert,et al.  Group lasso with overlap and graph lasso , 2009, ICML '09.

[33]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Compressive Diffuse Optical Tomography: Noniterative Exact Reconstruction Using Joint Sparsity , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Shuiwang Ji,et al.  SLEP: Sparse Learning with Efficient Projections , 2011 .

[35]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Forest Sparsity for Multi-Channel Compressive Sensing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[36]  Ivan W. Selesnick,et al.  Translation-invariant shrinkage/thresholding of group sparse signals , 2013, Signal Process..

[37]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  Learning with dynamic group sparsity , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[38]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Assessment of the cerebral cortex during motor task behaviours in adults: A systematic review of functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[39]  Wotao Yin,et al.  Group sparse optimization by alternating direction method , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[40]  Jaya Prakash,et al.  A LSQR-type method provides a computationally efficient automated optimal choice of regularization parameter in diffuse optical tomography. , 2013, Medical physics.

[41]  James C. Gee,et al.  Landmark matching based retinal image alignment by enforcing sparsity in correspondence matrix , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[42]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[43]  Phaneendra K. Yalavarthy,et al.  Sparse Recovery Methods Hold Promise for Diffuse Optical Tomographic Image Reconstruction , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[44]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Joint sparsity-driven non-iterative simultaneous reconstruction of absorption and scattering in diffuse optical tomography. , 2013, Optics express.

[45]  Hanli Liu,et al.  Optimization of probe geometry for diffuse optical brain imaging based on measurement density and distribution. , 2009, Applied optics.

[46]  V. Ntziachristos,et al.  Three-dimensional diffuse optical tomography in the parallel plane transmission geometry: evaluation of a hybrid frequency domain/continuous wave clinical system for breast imaging. , 2003, Medical physics.