Protein Flexibility in Docking-Based Virtual Screening: Discovery of Novel Lymphoid-Specific Tyrosine Phosphatase Inhibitors Using Multiple Crystal Structures
暂无分享,去创建一个
Xiao Yu | Hao Fang | Xuben Hou | Kangshuai Li | Jin-peng Sun | Xuben Hou | H. Fang | Xiao Yu | Jin-peng Sun | Kang-shuai Li | Kangshuai Li
[1] Gerrit Groenhof,et al. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[2] Xuben Hou,et al. Fast identification of novel lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors using target-ligand interaction-based virtual screening. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[3] Arthur J. Olson,et al. AutoDock4Zn: An Improved AutoDock Force Field for Small-Molecule Docking to Zinc Metalloproteins , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[4] Nunzio Bottini,et al. Discovery of a novel series of inhibitors of lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase with activity in human T cells. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[5] W. Chen,et al. Cadmium is a potent inhibitor of PPM phosphatases and targets the M1 binding site , 2013, Scientific Reports.
[6] T. Martin Schmeing,et al. An induced-fit mechanism to promote peptide bond formation and exclude hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA , 2005, Nature.
[7] Tingjun Hou,et al. Assessing an Ensemble Docking-Based Virtual Screening Strategy for Kinase Targets by Considering Protein Flexibility , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[8] Ajay N. Jain. Surflex-Dock 2.1: Robust performance from ligand energetic modeling, ring flexibility, and knowledge-based search , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[9] A. Fedorov,et al. Crystal Structure of PTP1B Complexed with a Potent and Selective Bidentate Inhibitor* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[10] Nunzio Bottini,et al. A potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor for the lymphoid-specific tyrosine phosphatase (LYP), a target associated with autoimmune diseases. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[11] Chenglong Li,et al. Novel Inhibitor Discovery through Virtual Screening against Multiple Protein Conformations Generated via Ligand-Directed Modeling: A Maternal Embryonic Leucine Zipper Kinase Example , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[12] X. Barril,et al. Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[13] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Growth of Ligand-Target Interaction Data in ChEMBL Is Associated with Increasing and Activity Measurement-Dependent Compound Promiscuity , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[14] Nunzio Bottini,et al. A functional variant of lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase is associated with type I diabetes , 2004, Nature Genetics.
[15] Irwin D. Kuntz,et al. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5 , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[16] N. P. Todorov,et al. Receptor flexibility in de novo ligand design and docking. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[17] Natasja Brooijmans,et al. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. , 2003, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[18] Wen Hwa Lee,et al. Large-Scale Structural Analysis of the Classical Human Protein Tyrosine Phosphatome , 2009, Cell.
[19] A. Magrini,et al. The association of PTPN22 polymorphism with endometriosis: effect of genetic and clinical factors. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[20] L. Nilsson,et al. Structure and Dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E Water Models at 298 K , 2001 .
[21] Thomas Mendgen,et al. Privileged scaffolds or promiscuous binders: a comparative study on rhodanines and related heterocycles in medicinal chemistry. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[22] Andy Hudmon,et al. Structure, inhibitor, and regulatory mechanism of Lyp, a lymphoid-specific tyrosine phosphatase implicated in autoimmune diseases , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[23] Freddie R Salsbury,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of protein dynamics and their relevance to drug discovery. , 2010, Current opinion in pharmacology.
[24] Yan Li,et al. Discovery of Novel Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitors by Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Crystal Structures , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[25] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Recipes for the Selection of Experimental Protein Conformations for Virtual Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[26] R. Dror,et al. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.
[27] J. Williamson. Induced fit in RNA–protein recognition , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.
[28] L. Klaman,et al. Ertiprotafib Improves Glycemic Control and Lowers Lipids via Multiple Mechanisms , 2005, Molecular Pharmacology.
[29] Joanna M. Sasin,et al. Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases in the Human Genome , 2004, Cell.
[30] Wei Cui,et al. Unraveling the Allosteric Inhibition Mechanism of PTP1B by Free Energy Calculation Based on Umbrella Sampling , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[31] J. Baell,et al. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[32] Conrad C. Huang,et al. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[33] Nunzio Bottini,et al. Tyrosine phosphatase PTPN22: multifunctional regulator of immune signaling, development, and disease. , 2014, Annual review of immunology.
[34] Yu-chian Chen. Beware of docking! , 2015, Trends in pharmacological sciences.
[35] Lutz Tautz,et al. In Silico Screening for PTPN22 Inhibitors: Active Hits from an Inactive Phosphatase Conformation , 2009, ChemMedChem.
[36] Berk Hess,et al. P-LINCS: A Parallel Linear Constraint Solver for Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[37] David S. Goodsell,et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[38] P. Kollman,et al. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[39] G. Maggiora,et al. Molecular similarity in medicinal chemistry. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[40] Gang Liu,et al. Selective protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitors: targeting the second phosphotyrosine binding site with non-carboxylic acid-containing ligands. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[41] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[42] Q. Pang,et al. Biochemical and Functional Studies of Lymphoid-Specific Tyrosine Phosphatase (Lyp) Variants S201F and R266W , 2012, PloS one.
[43] Lazaros Mavridis,et al. Comprehensive Comparison of Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Tools Against the DUD Data set Reveals Limitations of Current 3D Methods , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[44] Araz Jakalian,et al. Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. Method , 2000 .
[45] Y. Sham,et al. Rapid identification of Keap1-Nrf2 small-molecule inhibitors through structure-based virtual screening and hit-based substructure search. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[46] Michael M. Mysinger,et al. Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[47] Richard D. Taylor,et al. Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[48] Christopher I. Bayly,et al. Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..
[49] Somesh D. Sharma,et al. Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. , 2009, Drug discovery today.
[50] Wolfgang Wenzel,et al. Modeling loop backbone flexibility in receptor‐ligand docking simulations , 2012, J. Comput. Chem..
[51] Yi Zhou,et al. Enhancing the Sensitivity of Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening by Incorporating Customized ZBG Features: A Case Study Using Histone Deacetylase 8 , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[52] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[53] V. Goldfarb,et al. Small molecule receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase γ (RPTPγ) ligands that inhibit phosphatase activity via perturbation of the tryptophan-proline-aspartate (WPD) loop. , 2011, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[54] Jian Zhang,et al. How to Improve Docking Accuracy of AutoDock4.2: A Case Study Using Different Electrostatic Potentials , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[55] Naomie Salim,et al. Combination of Fingerprint-Based Similarity Coefficients Using Data Fusion , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[56] Johannes C. Hermann,et al. Structure-based activity prediction for an enzyme of unknown function , 2007, Nature.
[57] I. Huijbers,et al. Rapid target gene validation in complex cancer mouse models using re-derived embryonic stem cells , 2014, EMBO molecular medicine.
[58] Nunzio Bottini,et al. Autoimmune-associated lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase is a gain-of-function variant , 2005, Nature Genetics.
[59] J. Jenkins,et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of the ribonucleolytic activity of human angiogenin that possesses antitumor activity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[60] Jacob D. Durrant,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery , 2011, BMC Biology.
[61] Jonathan W. Essex,et al. Ensemble Docking into Multiple Crystallographically Derived Protein Structures: An Evaluation Based on the Statistical Analysis of Enrichments , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[62] Nathanael Weill,et al. Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules, 7. Impact of Protein Flexibility and Water Molecules on Docking-Based Virtual Screening Accuracy , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[63] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. The incorporation of protein flexibility and conformational energy penalties in docking screens to improve ligand discovery , 2014, Nature chemistry.
[64] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.
[65] J. Bajorath,et al. Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[66] Tingjun Hou,et al. Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Virtual Screening Strategy by Combining Molecular Docking and Pharmacophore Searching Based on Multiple Protein Structures , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[67] Oliver Korb,et al. Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[68] Dariusz Plewczynski,et al. VoteDock: Consensus docking method for prediction of protein–ligand interactions , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..
[69] Thomas Lengauer,et al. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein–ligand docking , 1999, Proteins.
[70] I. Kuntz,et al. DOCK 6: combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes. , 2009, RNA.
[71] David E. Shaw,et al. The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery , 2011, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[72] Terry P Lybrand,et al. Staggered Mesh Ewald: An extension of the Smooth Particle-Mesh Ewald method adding great versatility. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[73] B. Lie,et al. LYP inhibits T cell activation when dissociated from CSK , 2012, Nature chemical biology.
[74] D. Koshland. The Key–Lock Theory and the Induced Fit Theory , 1995 .
[75] Jeremy L Jenkins,et al. Virtual screening to enrich hit lists from high‐throughput screening: A case study on small‐molecule inhibitors of angiogenin , 2002, Proteins.
[76] M. Nieuwenhuyzen,et al. A new approach to combretastatin D2. , 2006, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.
[77] Richard D. Taylor,et al. Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.
[78] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Matched molecular pair analysis of small molecule microarray data identifies promiscuity cliffs and reveals molecular origins of extreme compound promiscuity. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[79] Peter M. Kasson,et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit , 2013, Bioinform..
[80] X. Zou,et al. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking , 2006, Proteins.
[81] Junmei Wang,et al. Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[82] Ling Wang,et al. Discovery of New Selective Human Aldose Reductase Inhibitors through Virtual Screening Multiple Binding Pocket Conformations , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..