Regional Development Platform based on ‘Related Variety’: Some Evidences from Tuscany

A recent contribution to regional/local development is the Regional Development Platform (RDP), a tool oflocal policy and governance meant for the planning and implementation of a regional innovation systemwith a sustainable and long-lasting competitive advantage. The aim of the present work is to contribute to the debate on local economic development throughplatforms of regional development, offering some specific cases in which the RDP model is developed notonly as a top-down policy tool in support to innovation, but also as a bottom-up governance tool for therelationships among cognitively-related industries. Finally, we also introduce the idea of the platform as ‘apublic space’ able to foster ideas and innovations through cross-fertilisation according to a Related-varietyapproach.

[1]  R. Boschma,et al.  Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? : towards an evolutionary economic geography , 2004 .

[2]  P. Cooke,et al.  Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases , 2011 .

[3]  Vesa Harmaakorpi,et al.  Regional Development Platform Method (RDPM) as a tool for regional innovation policy 1 , 2006 .

[4]  Roel Rutten,et al.  Spatial Innovation Systems: Theory and Cases—an Introduction , 2007 .

[5]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[6]  J. Jordana.  Traditional foods: challenges facing the European food industry , 2000 .

[7]  Luciana Lazzeretti,et al.  Do Creative Industries Cluster? Mapping Creative Local Production Systems in Italy and Spain , 2008 .

[8]  Philip Cooke,et al.  To Construct Regional Advantage from Innovation Systems First Build Policy Platforms , 2007 .

[9]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 05 . 02 Variety and regional economic growth in the Netherlands , 2005 .

[10]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  Innovation—The Missing DimensionInnovation—The Missing Dimension By LesterRichard K. , and PioreMichael J.Cambridge, MA: PHarvard University Press, 2004. 223 pages, paperback, $15.95 , 2007 .

[11]  Vesa Harmaakorpi,et al.  Knowledge management in regional innovation networks: The case of Lahti, Finland1 , 2005 .

[12]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Innovation, Learning and Cluster Dynamics , 2004 .

[13]  R. Martin,et al.  Path dependence and regional economic evolution , 2006 .

[14]  Dominic Power,et al.  Putting Porter into Practice? Practices of Regional Cluster Building: Evidence from Sweden , 2002 .

[15]  Francesco Capone.  14. Mapping and Analysing Creative Systems in Italy (1991–2001) , 2007 .

[16]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[17]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge , 2002 .

[18]  R. Boschma,et al.  Evolutionary economics and industry location , 2003 .

[19]  P. Cooke.  Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[20]  J. Christensen.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2008 .

[21]  Costanza Nosi,et al.  Moving from “typical products” to “food‐related services”: The Slow Food case as a new business paradigm , 2004 .

[22]  Nikolina Fuduric.  Regions: The Dilemmas of Integration and Competition , 2008 .

[23]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[24]  S. Iammarino,et al.  Related variety and regional growth in Italy ^ , 2007 .

[25]  John Cantwell,et al.  Multinational Corporations and European Regional Systems of Innovation , 2003 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[27]  L. D. Propris.  RECONCILING COHESION AND COMPETITIVENESS THROUGH EU CLUSTER POLICIES , 2007 .

[28]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .