An experimental investigation into the radiation field offset of a dynamic multileaf collimator

In this study we investigate the characteristics of a rounded leaf end multileaf collimator (MLC) that is used for delivering intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a Varian linear accelerator. The rounded leaf end MLC design results in an offset between the radiation field edge (the physical leaf position) and the light field (the geometric leaf position). We call this the radiation field offset (RFO). The leaf position is calibrated to the leaf tip at the mid-leaf plane. There is an additional offset between the geometric leaf position and the projected leaf tip position that varies as a function of distance from the collimator central axis due to the MLC geometry. We call this the leaf position offset (LPO). There is a lack of consistency in the interpretation and implementation of the RFO and the LPO in the literature. We investigated the RFO and the LPO on Varian's 600 C/D and 21 EX linear accelerators. We used a combination of film and ion chamber measurements of static, segmental MLC (SMLC) and dynamic MLC (DMLC) fields to quantify the leaf offsets across the range of leaf positions. We were able to improve the dosimetry at large off-axis positions with minor adjustments to the vendor's LPO file. The RFO was determined to within 0.1 mm accuracy at the collimator central axis. The measured RFO value depends on whether the method is based on the radiation field edge position or on an integral dose measurement. The integral dose method results in an RFO that is approximately 0.2 mm greater than the radiation field edge method. The difference is due to the MLC penumbra shape. We propose a methodology for measuring and implementing MLC leaf offsets that is suitable for both SMLC and DMLC IMRT. In addition, we propose some definitions that more clearly describe the MLC leaf position for accurate IMRT dosimetry.

[1]  A L Boyer,et al.  Geometric analysis of light-field position of a multileaf collimator with curved ends. , 1997, Medical physics.

[2]  Yoichi Watanabe,et al.  A Practical Guide to Intensity‐Modulated Radiation Therapy , 2003 .

[3]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Dependence of fluence errors in dynamic IMRT on leaf-positional errors varying with time and leaf number. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  P. C. Williams IMRT: delivery techniques and quality assurance. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  G. Ibbott,et al.  Dosimetric considerations for validation of a sequential IMRT process with a commercial treatment planning system. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  D A Low,et al.  Clinical implementation of a commercial multileaf collimator: dosimetry, networking, simulation, and quality assurance. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  G T Chen,et al.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery error from radiation field offset inaccuracy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[8]  M. C. Murillo,et al.  Dose calculation and verification of intensity modulation generated by dynamic multileaf collimators. , 2000, Medical physics.

[9]  F. Khan The physics of radiation therapy , 1985 .

[10]  Daniel A. Low,et al.  Basic Applications of Multileaf Collimators , 2001 .

[11]  R Mohan,et al.  A method for determining multileaf collimator transmission and scatter for dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  T LoSasso,et al.  Dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated fields. , 1996, Medical physics.

[13]  C. Ling,et al.  Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileaf collimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 1998, Medical physics.

[14]  J C Rosenwald,et al.  The sliding slit test for dynamic IMRT: a useful tool for adjustment of MLC related parameters , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  S. Spirou,et al.  Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators. , 1994, Medical physics.

[16]  R. Mohan,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of radiation transport through multileaf collimators. , 2001, Medical physics.

[17]  T LoSasso,et al.  Comprehensive quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy with a multileaf collimator used in the dynamic mode. , 2001, Medical physics.

[18]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  IMRT clinical implementation: Prostate and pelvic node irradiation using Helios and a 120‐leaf multileaf collimator , 2002, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[19]  Benedick A Fraass,et al.  Incorporation of realistic delivery limitations into dynamic MLC treatment delivery. , 2002, Medical physics.

[20]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Commissioning of a commercially available system for intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose delivery with dynamic multileaf collimation. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  Robert J. Shalek,et al.  Determination of Absorbed Dose in a Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma Rays in Radiotherapy Procedures , 1977 .

[22]  D L McShan,et al.  Calibration and quality assurance for rounded leaf-end MLC systems. , 2001, Medical physics.

[23]  Todd McNutt,et al.  Validation of physics improvements for IMRT with a commercial treatment‐planning system , 2005, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[24]  James M. Galvin,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF A MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR SYSTEM , 1993 .

[25]  P. Metcalfe,et al.  Verification of a rounded leaf-end MLC model used in a radiotherapy treatment planning system , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  R Mohan,et al.  The impact of fluctuations in intensity patterns on the number of monitor units and the quality and accuracy of intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[27]  Mauro Iori,et al.  Acceptance tests and quality control (QC) procedures for the clinical implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using inverse planning and the sliding window technique: experience from five radiotherapy departments. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. , 2003, Medical physics.

[29]  A Brahme,et al.  Shaping of arbitrary dose distributions by dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1988, Physics in medicine and biology.