PEV fleet scheduling with electricity market and grid signals Charging schedules with capacity pricing based on DSO's long run marginal cost

Electricity market signals are deemed efficient to allocate resources at the transmission system level, yet they may not always sufficiently represent the local network status of the distribution system. Furthermore, high penetration levels of Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEV) potentially cause network reinforcement, which would have an impact on investment, operation and maintenance costs. While long run marginal cost pricing for computing node dependent network Use-of-System (UoS) tariffs has been proposed for integrating distributed generation, it remains unexplored in the context of PEV charging. Hence, this paper formulates the PEV energy retail problem with interactions in day-ahead and balancing markets from the aggregator's perspective, taking into account location dependent network UoS tariffs in the form of capacity prices for active power. While the retail tariff for the final customer is supposed fixed in the medium term, these capacity prices are accounted as costs to the aggregator. By aligning the PEV charging schedule, in time and location, to the network signals, the aggregator can hence further minimize its perceived costs. Applied to a medium voltage system with urban characteristics and spatial PEV mobility, profit optimal charging schedules for the aggregator are found. The result analysis and concluding remarks focus on the relevance of including node dependent network UoS tariffs.

[1]  G. Strbac,et al.  Value of combining energy storage and wind in short-term energy and balancing markets , 2003 .

[2]  A. Conejo,et al.  Decision making under uncertainty in electricity markets , 2010, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[3]  Martin Wietschel,et al.  Grid integration of intermittent renewable energy sources using price-responsive plug-in electric vehicles , 2012 .

[4]  Ilan Momber,et al.  Regulatory Framework and Business Models Integrating EVs in Power Systems , 2013 .

[5]  Christof Weinhardt,et al.  Economic benchmark of charging strategies for battery electric vehicles , 2011, 2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech.

[6]  A. Conejo,et al.  A Stochastic Programming Approach to Electric Energy Procurement for Large Consumers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Lina P Garces,et al.  Weekly Self-Scheduling, Forward Contracting, and Offering Strategy for a Producer , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Furong Li,et al.  Long-Run Marginal Cost Pricing Based on Analytical Method for Revenue Reconciliation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Michel Luis Rivier Abbad,et al.  Regulatory framework and business models for charging plug-in electric vehicles: Infrastructure, agents, and commercial relationships , 2011 .

[10]  Salvador Pineda Morente Medium-term electricity trading for risk-averse power producers via stochastic programming , 2011 .

[11]  Silvano Martello,et al.  Decision Making under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets , 2015, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  David Dallinger,et al.  Vehicle-to-Grid Regulation Reserves Based on a Dynamic Simulation of Mobility Behavior , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  A. Conejo,et al.  A Bilevel Stochastic Programming Approach for Retailer Futures Market Trading , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Short-Term Trading for a Wind Power Producer , 2010 .