Probabilistic Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Reconstructions from X-Ray Images Spanning a Limited Angle

An important part of computed tomography is the calculation of a three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from series of X-ray images. Unfortunately, some applications do not provide sufficient X-ray images. Then, the reconstructed objects no longer truly represent the original. Inside of the volumes, the accuracy seems to vary unpredictably. In this paper, we introduce a novel method to evaluate any reconstruction, voxel by voxel. The evaluation is based on a sophisticated probabilistic handling of the measured X-rays, as well as the inclusion of a priori knowledge about the materials that the object receiving the X-ray examination consists of. For each voxel, the proposed method outputs a numerical value that represents the probability of existence of a predefined material at the position of the voxel while doing X-ray. Such a probabilistic quality measure was lacking so far. In our experiment, false reconstructed areas get detected by their low probability. In exact reconstructed areas, a high probability predominates. Receiver Operating Characteristics not only confirm the reliability of our quality measure but also demonstrate that existing methods are less suitable for evaluating a reconstruction.

[1]  Yair Censor,et al.  Binary steering in discrete tomography reconstruction with sequential and simultaneous iterative algorithms , 2001 .

[2]  Thorsten M. Buzug,et al.  Einführung in die Computertomographie , 2004 .

[3]  M. Glas,et al.  Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging , 2000 .

[4]  H. S. Wolff,et al.  iRun: Horizontal and Vertical Shape of a Region-Based Graph Compression , 2022, Sensors.

[5]  A. Kuba,et al.  Preliminary studies of discrete tomography in neutron imaging , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Hybrid Cone-Beam Tomographic Reconstruction: Incorporation of Prior Anatomical Models to Compensate for Missing Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  G. Herman,et al.  Advances in discrete tomography and its applications , 2007 .

[8]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Probabilistic Modeling of Discrete Images , 1999 .

[9]  K. Mueller,et al.  Fast and accurate three-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam projection data using algebraic methods , 1998 .

[10]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  Multiscale Bayesian Methods for Discrete Tomography , 1999 .

[11]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[12]  Kees Joost Batenburg,et al.  Dart: A Fast Heuristic Algebraic Reconstruction Algorithm for Discrete Tomography , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[13]  Max Mignotte,et al.  A hierarchical statistical modeling approach for the unsupervised 3-D biplanar reconstruction of the scoliotic spine , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography: Image Reconstruction from Projections , 2009, Advances in Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Péter Balázs,et al.  Projection Selection Algorithms for Discrete Tomography , 2010, ACIVS.

[16]  Lin Ma,et al.  Comparison of approaches based on optimization and algebraic iteration for binary tomography , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[17]  R. Yager On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules , 1987, Inf. Sci..

[18]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.