Effective Connectivity-Based Neural Decoding: A Causal Interaction-Driven Approach

We propose a geometric model-free causality measurebased on multivariate delay embedding that can efficiently detect linear and nonlinear causal interactions between time series with no prior information. We then exploit the proposed causal interaction measure in real MEG data analysis. The results are used to construct effective connectivity maps of brain activity to decode different categories of visual stimuli. Moreover, we discovered that the MEG-based effective connectivity maps as a response to structured images exhibit more geometric patterns, as disclosed by analyzing the evolution of toplogical structures of the underlying networks using persistent homology. Extensive simulation and experimental result have been carried out to substantiate the capabilities of the proposed approach.

[1]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[2]  Brian Klinkenberg,et al.  A review of methods used to determine the fractal dimension of linear features , 1994 .

[3]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[4]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Sparse Causal Discovery in Multivariate Time Series , 2008, NIPS Causality: Objectives and Assessment.

[5]  R. Kahn,et al.  Efficiency of Functional Brain Networks and Intellectual Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Afra Zomorodian,et al.  Computing Persistent Homology , 2004, SCG '04.

[7]  B. T. Thomas Yeo,et al.  The Organization of Local and Distant Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  C. Stam,et al.  Small‐world properties of nonlinear brain activity in schizophrenia , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Classification of Multichannel Signals With Cumulant-Based Kernels , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[13]  C D Tesche,et al.  Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Current trends in Graz Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  C. Braun,et al.  Hand Movement Direction Decoded from MEG and EEG , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Dimitris Kugiumtzis,et al.  Non-uniform state space reconstruction and coupling detection , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Tore Opsahl,et al.  Prominence and control: the weighted rich-club effect. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[19]  Hamid Krim,et al.  Real time detection of harmonic structure: A case for topological signal analysis , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[20]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  Mohammad Bagher Shamsollahi,et al.  MEG based classification of wrist movement. , 2009, Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference.

[22]  E. Pastalkova,et al.  Clique topology reveals intrinsic geometric structure in neural correlations , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  R. Ho Algebraic Topology , 2022 .

[24]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[25]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[26]  Hamid Krim,et al.  Spectral estimation in highly transient data , 2015, 2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[27]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[28]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Structural Insights into Aberrant Topological Patterns of Large-Scale Cortical Networks in Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[30]  Hamid Krim,et al.  Persistent Homology of Delay Embeddings and its Application to Wheeze Detection , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[31]  P. Mitra,et al.  The Brain Atlas Concordance Problem: Quantitative Comparison of Anatomical Parcellations , 2009, PloS one.

[32]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Generalized Features for Electrocorticographic BCIs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[34]  L. Tsimring,et al.  The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems , 1993 .

[35]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Spectral and Nonlinear Analyses of MEG Background Activity in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Haiping Lu,et al.  Regularized Common Spatial Pattern With Aggregation for EEG Classification in Small-Sample Setting , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  P. Grassberger,et al.  Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors , 1983 .

[39]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Disturbed Beta Band Functional Connectivity in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: An MEG Study , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  Frequency domain simultaneous source and source coherence estimation with an application to MEG , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[45]  Francesco Camastra,et al.  Data dimensionality estimation methods: a survey , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[46]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[47]  Bin He,et al.  Electrophysiological Imaging of Brain Activity and Connectivity—Challenges and Opportunities , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Estimating mutual information. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  Wei Wu,et al.  Bayesian Machine Learning: EEG\/MEG signal processing measurements , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[50]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Hierarchical functional modularity in the resting‐state human brain , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[51]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[52]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Global Connectivity of Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Cognitive Control and Intelligence , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[54]  Laveen N. Kanal,et al.  Classification, Pattern Recognition and Reduction of Dimensionality , 1982, Handbook of Statistics.

[55]  Fei He,et al.  A new NARX-based Granger linear and nonlinear casual influence detection method with applications to EEG data , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[56]  David Cohen-Steiner,et al.  Stability of Persistence Diagrams , 2005, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[57]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Estimating the Selectivity of Spatial Queries Using the 'Correlation' Fractal Dimension , 1995, VLDB.

[58]  Dirk B. Walther,et al.  Natural Scene Categories Revealed in Distributed Patterns of Activity in the Human Brain , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Adam J. Schwarz,et al.  Negative edges and soft thresholding in complex network analysis of resting state functional connectivity data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[60]  Kunihiro Chihara,et al.  Hierarchical clustering and filtering in half-inverse space for MEG and/or EEG hypothesis-free analysis , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[61]  Bung-Nyun Kim,et al.  Persistent Brain Network Homology From the Perspective of Dendrogram , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[62]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[63]  K. Müller,et al.  Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[64]  Joel Z. Leibo,et al.  The dynamics of invariant object recognition in the human visual system. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[66]  H. Kantz,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis , 1997 .

[67]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Topological persistence and simplification , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[68]  Gunnar E. Carlsson,et al.  Topology and data , 2009 .