Defining Susceptibility for Microbial Risk Assessment: Results of a Workshop

An interdisciplinary workshop was convened by the George Washington University in June 2001 to discuss how to incorporate new knowledge about susceptibility to microbial pathogens into risk assessment and management strategies. Experts from government, academic, and private sector organizations discussed definitions, methods, data needs, and issues related to susceptibility in microbial risk assessment. The participants agreed that modeling approaches need to account for the highly specific nature of host-pathogen relationships, and the wide variability of infectivity, immunity, disease transmission, and outcome rates within microbial species and strains. Concerns were raised about distinguishing between exposure and dose more clearly, interpreting experimental and outbreak data correctly, and using thresholds and possibly linearity at low doses. Recommendations were made to advance microbial risk assessment by defining specific terms and concepts more precisely, designing explicit conceptual frameworks to guide development of more complex models and data collection, addressing susceptibility in all steps of the model, measuring components of immunity to characterize susceptibility, reexamining underlying assumptions, applying default methods appropriately, obtaining more mechanistic data to improve default methods, and developing more biologically relevant and continuous risk estimators. The interrelated impacts of selecting specific subpopulations and health outcomes, and of increasing model complexity and data demands, were considered in the contexts of public policy goals and resources required. The participants stated that zero risk is unattainable, so targeted and effective risk reduction and communication strategies are essential not only to raise pubic awareness about water quality but also to protect the most susceptible members of the population.

[1]  D. Graham,et al.  Detection of Norwalk virus in stool by polymerase chain reaction , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[2]  R. Calderon,et al.  A two-year follow-up survey of antibody to Cryptosporidium in Jackson County, Oregon following an outbreak of waterborne disease , 1998, Epidemiology and Infection.

[3]  R. Baric,et al.  Detection of Norwalk virus in stool specimens by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and nonradioactive oligoprobes , 1992, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[4]  J. Balbus,et al.  Susceptibility in microbial risk assessment: definitions and research needs. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  D. Bernstein,et al.  Human rotavirus studies in volunteers: determination of infectious dose and serological response to infection. , 1986, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  G. Craun,et al.  Serological analysis of a cryptosporidiosis epidemic. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  H. Dupont,et al.  Infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy adults with pre-existing anti-C. parvum serum immunoglobulin G. , 1999, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[8]  R. Chanock,et al.  Prevalence of antibody to the Norwalk virus in various countries , 1979, Infection and immunity.

[9]  J. Foran,et al.  Assessing the Risks Associated With Exposure to Waterborne Pathogens: An Expert Panel's Report on Risk Assessment †. , 1997, Journal of food protection.

[10]  R. Glass,et al.  Molecular epidemiology of "Norwalk-like viruses" in outbreaks of gastroenteritis in the United States. , 1998, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[11]  H. Dupont,et al.  Virulence of three distinct Cryptosporidium parvum isolates for healthy adults. , 1999, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[12]  G. Craun,et al.  Paired city Cryptosporidium serosurvey in the southwest USA , 2001, Epidemiology and Infection.

[13]  K. Hedlund,et al.  Epidemiology of calicivirus infections in Sweden, 1994-1998. , 2000, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[14]  J. Vinjé,et al.  Molecular epidemiology of human enteric caliciviruses in The Netherlands. , 2000, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[15]  N. Okabe,et al.  Surveillance of Viral Gastroenteritis in Japan: Pediatric Cases and Outbreak Incidents , 2000, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  R T Parkin,et al.  Variations in Concepts of “Susceptibility” in Risk Assessment , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  H. Dupont,et al.  Susceptibility and Serologic Response of Healthy Adults to Reinfection with Cryptosporidium parvum , 1998, Infection and Immunity.