Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series A Framework for Interactive Learning in Emerging Technologies

Innovation is an interactive learning process which is of special interest for emerging technologies in which complex complementary knowledge from heterogeneous stakeholders is combined. In the emerging phase of technology development a lot of knowledge is tacit and can only be transferred face-to-face. At the same time a shared vision between stakeholders is being formed that acts as a driver for innovation. Although the importance of interactive learning is widely acknowledged, an adequate framework for studying interactive learning processes in emerging technologies is still missing. Therefore we formulated the leading research question: How to understand and conceptualize interactive learning in the context of emerging technologies? We did not only take the outcome of interactive learning into account, but also focused on opening the black box of the interactive learning process. We developed a framework based on characteristic elements of the interactive learning process in emerging technologies (i.e. prime mover, intermediaries, network formation and knowledge flows), influencing conditions (geographical, cognitive, regulatory, cultural and organisational proximity), and the outcome of the interactive learning process (single-loop and double-loop, tacit and codified knowledge). Clarifying examples are taken from the empirical field of the development of novel food products (functional foods).

[1]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[2]  J. March,et al.  Organizational Learning , 2008 .

[3]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[4]  D. Stark,et al.  Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism , 1997 .

[5]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .

[6]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[8]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[9]  Christophe Sierra,et al.  The Internationalisation of R&D by Multinationals: A Trade-off between External and Internal Proximity , 1999 .

[10]  C. Edquist,et al.  Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation , 2013 .

[11]  D. Gregori,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[12]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[13]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[14]  Paul Tracey,et al.  Alliances, Networks and Competitive Strategy: Rethinking Clusters of Innovation , 2003 .

[15]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II , 1993 .

[16]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[17]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  User involvement competence for radical innovation , 2007 .

[18]  Guido Blasio,et al.  Does the Internet Kill the Distance? Evidence From Navigation, E-Commerce, and E-Banking , 2006 .

[19]  R. Smits,et al.  The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy , 2004 .

[20]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography , 2002 .

[21]  G. Omenn.  Grand Challenges and Great Opportunities in Science, Technology, and Public Policy , 2006, Science.

[22]  Philip J. Vergragt.  The Social Shaping of Industrial Innovations , 1988 .

[23]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering , 2002 .

[24]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes , 2003 .

[25]  Harro van Lente,et al.  Tracing emerging irreversibilities in emerging technologies: The case of nanotubes , 2005 .

[26]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .

[27]  P. Saviotti.  Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy , 1996 .

[28]  K. Frenken,et al.  The geography of research collaboration: theoretical considerations and stylized facts in biotechnology in Europe and the United States , 2005 .

[29]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[30]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[31]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[32]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[33]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Localized technological change , 2003 .

[34]  John Gabriel Goddard,et al.  How Do Public Laboratories Collaborate with Industry? New Survey Evidence from France , 2006 .

[35]  H. Minuk,et al.  Metabolic syndrome. , 2005, Journal of insurance medicine.

[36]  R. Boschma,et al.  Evolutionary economics and economic geography , 1999 .

[37]  R. Boschma.  Competitiveness of Regions from an Evolutionary Perspective , 2004 .

[38]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National systems of production, innovation and competence building , 2002 .

[39]  Kevin Morgan,et al.  The Associational Economy , 1998 .

[40]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[41]  C. Mark-Herbert,et al.  Functional foods for added value , 2002 .

[42]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to national systems of innovation , 2010 .

[43]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of Innovating Users in a Consumer Goods Field: An Empirical Study of Sport-Related Product Consumers , 2002 .

[44]  Linda M. Kamp,et al.  Learning in wind turbine development , 2002 .

[45]  Matthijs Dekker,et al.  Functional foods : position and future perspectives , 2000 .

[46]  Knut Koschatzky,et al.  Innovation networks : concepts and challenges in the European perspective , 2001 .

[47]  David Doloreux,et al.  Regional networks of small and medium sized enterprises: evidence from the Metropolitan Area of Ottawa in Canada1 , 2004 .

[48]  Julian Mellentin,et al.  The Functional Foods Revolution: Healthy People, Healthy Profits? , 2001 .

[49]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[50]  P. Checkland.  Soft systems methodology: an overview , 1988 .

[51]  A. Malmberg,et al.  Guest Editorial , 1999 .

[52]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[53]  J. Senker.  Tacit Knowledge and Models of Innovation , 1995 .

[54]  D. Collingridge.  The social control of technology , 1980 .

[55]  J. Christensen.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2008 .

[56]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[57]  Jean-Daniel Zucker,et al.  Horizons in nutritional science : The case for strategic international alliances to harness nutritional genomics for public and personal health. , 2005 .

[58]  M. Kerkhof,et al.  Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: Methodological considerations , 2005 .

[59]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking , 2005 .

[60]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Inter-firm alliances: Analysis and design , 1999 .

[61]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[62]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Innovation as an interactive process , 2016 .

[63]  John Cantwell,et al.  special issue: The new geography of corporate research in Information and Communications Technology (ICT) , 2002 .

[64]  Edwin R. Otto.  Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage , 1986 .

[65]  S. Grundy,et al.  The metabolic syndrome. , 2008, Endocrine reviews.

[66]  J. Spence.  Challenges related to the composition of functional foods , 2006 .

[67]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[68]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[69]  F. J. Bongers,et al.  Participatory Policy Analysis and Group Support Systems , 2000 .

[70]  Steven Casper,et al.  Innovation Strategies, Interactive Learning and Innovation Networks , 2005 .

[71]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[72]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[73]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  A Customer-active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation , 1978 .

[74]  J. Milner,et al.  Functional foods: the US perspective. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[75]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[76]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[77]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[78]  Martin Kussmann,et al.  OMICS-driven biomarker discovery in nutrition and health. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[79]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Competitiveness of Firms and Regions , 1999 .

[80]  J. Krige.  How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology , 2006 .

[81]  Joachim Scholderer,et al.  Consumer acceptance of functional foods: issues for the future , 2003 .

[82]  E. Moors,et al.  User–producer interactions in functional genomics innovations , 2003 .

[83]  Pim Den Hertog,et al.  TA and the management of innovation in economy and society , 2007 .