Neural adaptation for novel objects during dynamic articulation

Human observers readily identify objects with moving parts, and recognize their underlying structure even when the component parts undergo complex movement. This suggests the existence of neural representations that are invariant to motion and state of articulation, which together allow our visual system to maintain 'object constancy'. Ventral temporal cortex has previously been implicated in object perception and in coding object identity, but it is unclear where this is achieved when objects undergo motion-driven shape changes. In the present study, we use fMRI adaptation to probe the neural response properties when subjects view dynamic novel objects. Our results reveal neural selectivity for novel objects in the LOC region of the occipito-temporal lobe, even when those objects are viewed as moving and articulating. We also identify a bilateral area of posterior fusiform outside of the LOC with neural populations invariant to changes in the articulatory state of an object, a critical feature of object constancy. These results demonstrate the functional importance of ventral temporal cortex in the perception of moving objects, and the existence of neural populations coding for object constancy across movement and articulation.

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[2]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[3]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single‐subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self‐organizing group independent component analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[4]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Alex Martin,et al.  Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[7]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The integration of higher order form and motion by the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  John A. Pyles,et al.  Visual perception and neural correlates of novel ‘biological motion’ , 2007, Vision Research.

[10]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Minami Ito,et al.  Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  R. Henson,et al.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  S. Edelman,et al.  Cue-Invariant Activation in Object-Related Areas of the Human Occipital Lobe , 1998, Neuron.

[16]  Keiji Tanaka Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  I. Biederman,et al.  Neural evidence for intermediate representations in object recognition , 2006, Vision Research.

[19]  S. Carlson,et al.  Distribution of cortical activation during visuospatial n-back tasks as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  G. Wallis The role of object motion in forging long-term representations of objects , 2002 .

[21]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Cortex-based independent component analysis of fMRI time series. , 2004 .

[22]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  T. Poggio,et al.  Neural mechanisms of object recognition , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  fMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  John T. Serences,et al.  A comparison of methods for characterizing the event-related BOLD timeseries in rapid fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Visual object recognition. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Differential Effects of Viewpoint on Object-Driven Activation in Dorsal and Ventral Streams , 2002, Neuron.

[28]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[29]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceived Shape Similarity among Unfamiliar Objects and the Organization of the Human Object Vision Pathway , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  H. Roediger Implicit memory in normal human subjects , 1993 .

[31]  R N Henson,et al.  Mechanisms of top-down facilitation in perception of visual objects studied by FMRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  M. Bar,et al.  Cortical Mechanisms Specific to Explicit Visual Object Recognition , 2001, Neuron.

[33]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[34]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[35]  Maciej Komosinski,et al.  Framsticks: Towards a Simulation of a Nature-Like World, Creatures and Evolution , 1999, ECAL.

[36]  W. Singer,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Objects Rotating in Depth , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[39]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[41]  G. Orban,et al.  Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. , 1993, Science.

[42]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[43]  Zoe Kourtzi,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of form analysis in the human visual cortex revealed by rapid event-related fMRI adaptation , 2005, NeuroImage.