Adenoma detection rate vs. adenoma per colonoscopy as quality indicators for colon cancer screening

is known as the ‘One and done’ approach. In operators who are focused on using ADR as a quality indicator, it is very well possible that they may perform a quality examination until they find one adenoma and then unintentionally decrease the quality of the rest of the examination of the colonoscopy, which will indirectly affect the quality of the procedure without affecting ADR (7). Additionally, operator-based variability is also exhibited by differences in proximal and distal adenoma detection rate, and ADR metric by its calculable metric standard cannot account for these differences (8)

[1]  S. Weissman,et al.  Comparison of Artificial Intelligence With Other Interventions to Improve Adenoma Detection Rate for Colonoscopy , 2022, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[2]  M. A. Khan,et al.  Second exam of right colon improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2022, Endoscopy international open.

[3]  L. Butterly,et al.  S545 Mean Adenomas Per Colonoscopy Is Inversely Associated With Post Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Validating This Quality Measure , 2021, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[4]  Sheng-Bing Zhao,et al.  Impact of 9-minute Withdrawal Time on the Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2020, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[5]  T. Church,et al.  Adenomas per colonoscopy and adenoma per positive participant as quality indicators for screening colonoscopy , 2020, Endoscopy International Open.

[6]  D. Adler,et al.  How to increase proximal adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis comparing water exchange, water immersion and air/CO2 insufflation methods for colonoscopy , 2020, Annals of gastroenterology.

[7]  M. Koo,et al.  Factors Associated With Adenoma Detection in Propofol-sedated Patients , 2019, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[8]  A. San Román,et al.  Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques , 2019, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  J. Cha,et al.  Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study. , 2018, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[10]  A. Rostom,et al.  Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study , 2018, BMC Gastroenterology.

[11]  Seth D. Crockett,et al.  Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate. , 2017, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  Byung Chang Kim,et al.  Correlation Between Bowel Preparation and the Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy , 2017, Annals of coloproctology.

[13]  J. Cha,et al.  Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy , 2016, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[14]  Á. Lanas,et al.  Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy , 2016, Endoscopy.

[15]  R. Pittayanon,et al.  The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate , 2016, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[16]  Muhammad F Dawwas,et al.  Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  J. GarcíaSánchez [Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal cancer deaths]. , 2012 .

[18]  Adrian V. Hernández,et al.  Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[19]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3) , 2012, Gut.

[20]  A. Zauber,et al.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Marcin Polkowski,et al.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  G. Harewood,et al.  Impact of Operator Fatigue on Endoscopy Performance: Implications for Procedure Scheduling , 2009, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[23]  A. McCullough,et al.  Afternoon Colonoscopies Have Higher Failure Rates than Morning Colonoscopies , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[24]  Douglas K. Rex,et al.  Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[25]  J. Church,et al.  Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer , 2002, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[26]  Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology , 2022 .

[27]  R. Maselli,et al.  Performance of arti fi cial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022 .