Distance students' readiness for and interest in collaboration and social media

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe how researchers from four large Canadian distance education or dual mode institutions conducted a survey aiming to describe the use of and interest in social software and Web 2.0 applications by distance education students and to measure their interest in collaborating with peers.Design/methodology/approach – In order to do this, an online questionnaire was distributed to students from four large Canadian distance education institutions. A systematic sampling procedure led to 3,462 completed questionnaires. The results show that students have diverse views and experiences, but they also show strong and significant age and gender differences in a variety of measures, as well as an important institution effect for interest in collaboration.Findings – Males and younger students score higher on almost all indicators, including cooperative preferences. In this paper the authors review quantitative results from the survey from earlier work (Poellhuber et al.) a...

[1]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2004 .

[2]  R. Straton,et al.  The Development of a Co-Operative, Competitive, and Individualised Learning Preference Scale for Students. , 1980 .

[3]  A. P. Rovai.  In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs , 2003, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  Wallace E. Boston,et al.  Assessing Retention in Online Learning: An Administrative Perspective , 2011 .

[5]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[7]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[8]  Denis Gillet,et al.  The 3A Interaction Model: Towards Bridging the Gap between Formal and Informal Learning , 2010, 2010 Third International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[9]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Instructional dialogue: distance education students’ dialogic behaviour , 2006 .

[10]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  Antecedents to Dropout in Distance Education: Does One Model Fit All? , 2008 .

[11]  H. Pillay,et al.  Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing Tertiary students’ readiness for online learning , 2007 .

[12]  Bruno Poellhuber.  Les effets de l'encadrement et de la collaboration sur la motivation et la persévérance dans les formations ouvertes et à distance soutenues par les TIC , 2007 .

[13]  Jon Dron,et al.  Collectives, Networks and Groups in Social Software for E-Learning , 2007 .

[14]  T. Anderson,et al.  Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. , 2010 .

[15]  Cherng-Jyh Yen,et al.  A Study of the Relationship between Gender and Online Social Presence , 2011, Int. J. Online Pedagog. Course Des..

[16]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Distance learning – Social software’s killer ap? , 2005 .

[17]  M. Paulsen,et al.  Transparency in Cooperative Online Education , 2009 .

[18]  A. Deschênes,et al.  Les Activités D'apprentissage Et D'encadrement Dans Des Cours Universitaires À Distance: Le Point De Vue Des Concepteurs , 2007 .

[19]  Jussi Karhu,et al.  Employees satisfied with performance measurement and rewards: is it even possible? , 2009 .

[20]  Jon Dron,et al.  How the Crowd Can Teach , 2011 .

[21]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Distance students’ readiness for social media and collaboration , 2011 .

[22]  Priscilla Lamont,et al.  Here Comes Everyone , 1996 .

[23]  R. Ocker,et al.  Collaborative Learning Environments: Exploring Student Attitudes and Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Asynchronous Computer Conferencing Settings , 2001 .

[24]  Josie Misko.  Getting to Grips with Self-Paced Learning. , 2000 .