Analysis of lscr1 minimization in the Geometric Separation Problem

Modern data are often composed of two (or more) morphologically distinct constituents - for instance, pointlike and curvelike structures in astronomical imaging of galaxies. Although it seems impossible to extract those components - as there are two unknowns for every datum - suggestive empirical results have already been obtained especially by Jean-Luc Starck and collaborators. In this paper we develop a theoretical view-point, defining a Geometric Separation Problem and analyzing a model procedure. This procedure is inspired by work relating lscr1 minimization and sparsity. The procedure uses two deliberately overcomplete systems which sparsify the different components and decomposes by lscr1 minimization of the analysis (rather than synthesis) frame coefficients. We formalize two concepts - cluster coherence in place of the now-traditional singleton coherence and lscr1 minimization in frame settings, including those where singleton coherence within one frame may be high - and develop all the needed machinery to make these into fruitful tools. Our general approach applies to the problem of geometric separation of pointlike and curvelike structures in images by employing frames of radial wavelets and curvelets or orthonormal wavelets and shearlets. Our theoretical results show that at all sufficiently fine scales, nearly-perfect separation is achieved. We use microlocal analysis to understand heuristically why separation might be possible and to organize a rigorous analysis.

[1]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  L. Hörmander The analysis of linear partial differential operators , 1990 .

[3]  D. Donoho,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 2001 .

[4]  D. Donoho,et al.  Simultaneous cartoon and texture image inpainting using morphological component analysis (MCA) , 2005 .

[5]  E. Candès,et al.  Continuous Curvelet Transform : I . Resolution of the Wavefront Set , 2003 .

[6]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Multilayered image representation: application to image compression , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Brushlets: A Tool for Directional Image Analysis and Image Compression , 1997 .

[8]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Wavelets and adapted waveform analysis , 2021, Wavelets.

[9]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of equations, the minimal 𝓁1‐norm near‐solution approximates the sparsest near‐solution , 2006 .

[10]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Multi-layered image representation: application to image compression , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[12]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  Adaptive Directional Subdivision Schemes and Shearlet Multiresolution Analysis , 2007, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[13]  D. Labate,et al.  Sparse Multidimensional Representations using Anisotropic Dilation and Shear Operators , 2006 .

[14]  E. Candès,et al.  Continuous curvelet transform , 2003 .

[15]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[17]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Sparse representations in unions of bases , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[18]  D. Labate,et al.  Resolution of the wavefront set using continuous shearlets , 2006, math/0605375.

[19]  B. Logan,et al.  Signal recovery and the large sieve , 1992 .

[20]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[21]  L. Hörmander,et al.  The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I: Distribution Theory and Fourier Analysis , 1983 .

[22]  E. Candès,et al.  Continuous curvelet transform: II. Discretization and frames , 2005 .

[23]  Michael Elad,et al.  Submitted to Ieee Transactions on Image Processing Image Decomposition via the Combination of Sparse Representations and a Variational Approach , 2022 .

[24]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  Microlocal Analysis of the Geometric Separation Problem , 2010, ArXiv.

[25]  Michael Elad,et al.  A generalized uncertainty principle and sparse representation in pairs of bases , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[26]  D. Donoho,et al.  Uncertainty principles and signal recovery , 1989 .