Prototypical Relations for Cortex-Inspired Semantic Representations

Cognitive systems for the representation of declarative knowledge like semantic networks and other graph-based systems are widely unrelated to characteristic neurobiological mechanisms in the brain. In this contribution we report on our efforts in bridging the gap between typical semantic relations like “is part of”, “has property” etc. and the laminar wiring pattern of the neocortex. Central to our approach is the identification of the cortical column as a basic building block within the relational network. These columns are typically sectioned into subsystems which comprise different horizontal layers and thereby provide different links for forward, backward and lateral processing. We show how these intercolumnar connections can be related to semantic links, which reflect hierarchical knowledge, temporal ordering and ontological relationship. These dimensions are of outstanding interest for most cognitive tasks. But also arbitrary n-ary relationships can be build by representing the relations as nodes and using only the proposed basic link types. As inference mechanism, a simple locally controlled activation spread was applied. It results directly from the intra-columnar connectivity which is uniform for all nodes. We tested the system with large commonsense databases and obtained promising results including predictions, context influences and feature inheritance.

[1]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Towards a theory of the laminar architecture of cerebral cortex: computational clues from the visual system. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  S G Lomber,et al.  Translaminar differentiation of visually guided behaviors revealed by restricted cerebral cooling deactivation. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  James G. Schmolze Terminological Knowledge Representation Systems Supporting N-ary Terms , 1989, KR.

[4]  C. Koch,et al.  Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.

[5]  A. Thomson,et al.  Interlaminar connections in the neocortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  E. Callaway,et al.  Excitatory cortical neurons form fine-scale functional networks , 2005, Nature.

[7]  Robert F. Hadley,et al.  Language acquisition from sparse input without error feedback , 1999, Neural Networks.

[8]  R. Kötter,et al.  Laminar characteristics of functional connectivity in rat barrel cortex revealed by stimulation with caged-glutamate , 2000, Neuroscience Research.

[9]  David Harel,et al.  On visual formalisms , 1988, CACM.

[10]  Roger Chaffin,et al.  The nature of semantic relations: a comparison of two approaches , 1989 .

[11]  Harold Boley,et al.  Declarative operations on nets , 1992 .

[12]  Julian Eggert,et al.  A Cortex-Inspired Neural-Symbolic Network for Knowledge Representation , 2007, NeSy.

[13]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Synaptic physiology of horizontal connections in the cat's visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[15]  Lokendra Shastri,et al.  Advances in SHRUTI—A Neurally Motivated Model of Relational Knowledge Representation and Rapid Inference Using Temporal Synchrony , 1999, Applied Intelligence.

[16]  Martha Walton Evens Relational Models of the Lexicon: Representing Knowledge in Semantic Networks , 2009 .

[17]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. , 2003, Psychological review.

[18]  Marc-Oliver Gewaltig,et al.  Simulations of signal flow in a functional model of the cortical column , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[19]  Hiroshi Tsujino,et al.  A Cortical-type Modular Neural Network for Hypothetical Reasoning , 1997, Neural Networks.

[20]  Jörg Lücke,et al.  Rapid Processing and Unsupervised Learning in a Model of the Cortical Macrocolumn , 2004, Neural Computation.