Worldlikeness: A Web-based Tool for Typological Psycholinguistic Research

In this paper, we introduce Worldlikeness, a web-based tool for collecting and sharing cross-linguistic wordlikeness judgments (nonce word acceptability judgments) to facilitate typological psycholinguistic research. Typological psycholinguistic research is essential since crucial factors affecting language processing vary across languages, but these factors often too confounded to tease apart by comparing just two languages at a time. This type of research is nevertheless difficult since it requires testing many speakers from each language, using materials designed with the help of expert native speakers. Worldlikeness aims to make typological psycholinguistics more feasible, by providing tools for separate groups of experimenters to design experiments with text, audio, images, and video for individual languages, collect judgments and reaction times online, and crucially, share their data with each other for typological analysis. We show that Worldlikeness successfully replicated Mandarin wordlikeness judgments collected using traditional lab-based software, and report its first use in a cross-linguistic study collecting wordlikeness judgments from bilingual speakers of Mandarin and Southern Min. This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/ vol23/iss1/4 U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 23.1, 2017 Worldlikeness: A Web-based Tool for Typological Psycholinguistic Research Tsung-Ying Chen and James Myers*

[1]  R. Baayen.  A real experiment is a factorial experiment , 2010 .

[2]  Todd M. Bailey,et al.  Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? , 2001 .

[3]  J. Myers.  Markedness and Lexical Typicality in Mandarin Acceptability Judgments , 2015 .

[4]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[5]  Alan C. L. Yu,et al.  Lexical and phonotactic effects on wordlikeness judgments in Cantonese , 2007 .

[6]  W. Labov.  Principles Of Linguistic Change , 1994 .

[7]  Martin Corley,et al.  Timing accuracy of Web experiments: A case study using the WebExp software package , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[8]  J. Grainger,et al.  Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: a megastudy. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Effects of Language Experience and Stimulus Complexity on the Categorical Perception of Pitch Direction , 2006 .

[10]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Mapping the moral domain. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  L. Katz,et al.  The reading process is different for different orthographies : the orthographic depth hypothesis , 1992 .

[13]  Juhani Järvikivi,et al.  Counterintuitive Cross-Linguistic Differences: More Morphological Computation in English Than in Finnish , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[14]  Hadas Kotek,et al.  A streamlined approach to online linguistic surveys , 2016 .

[15]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[16]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Timed picture naming in seven languages , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  S. Frisch,et al.  The Psychological Reality of OCP-Place in Arabic , 2001 .

[18]  André Locher,et al.  Tatool: A Java-based open-source programming framework for psychological studies , 2013, Behavior research methods.