Changes in agonist EMG activation level during MVC cannot explain early strength improvement

A substantial gain in strength is often observed in the early phase of resistance training. The aim of this study was to address whether improved strength in the early phase of resistance training, can be attributed to increased activation, or to intra-muscular changes of the agonist muscle during maximal isometric torque production. Fourteen male subjects trained maximal isometric dorsiflexion during 5 days. Each subject performed 9 sessions with 25 maximal voluntary contractions in a device that registered the dorsiflexion torque. Surface electromyography (SEMG) of the tibialis anterior (TA) was recorded with a 130-channel grid electrode. SEMG of the extensor digitorum longus, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were recorded with bipolar electrodes. The main finding was that all subjects gained in strength while the SEMG activation level of the primer agonist, TA, decreased with no apparent intra-muscular spatial changes following 5 days of resistance training. The other muscles that influence dorsiflexion torque did not modify their activation level with training. These findings reject an increase in agonist activation level as the main source for early strength gain, and illustrate the need for further research to reveal the specific sites of neural adaptation and other physiological mechanisms that might contribute to increased strength during the early phase of resistance training.

[1]  M. Bilodeau,et al.  EMG frequency content changes with increasing force and during fatigue in the quadriceps femoris muscle of men and women. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[2]  J. Duchateau,et al.  Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  J. Andersen,et al.  Enhanced sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release following intermittent sprint training , 2000 .

[4]  Karin Roeleveld,et al.  Motor unit size estimation of enlarged motor units with surface electromyography , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Motor unit size estimation: confrontation of surface EMG with macro EMG. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Andersen,et al.  Enhanced sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) release following intermittent sprint training. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[7]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Tarnopolsky,et al.  Changes in human skeletal muscle ultrastructure and force production after acute resistance exercise. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Multi-channel EMG of the M. triceps brachii in rats during treadmill locomotion , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  G J van Ingen Schenau,et al.  Isokinetic plantar flexion: experimental results and model calculations. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  T J Carroll,et al.  Neural Adaptations to Resistance Training , 2001, Sports medicine.

[12]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[13]  C. Gerber,et al.  Muscle filament spacing and short‐term heavy‐resistance exercise in humans. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  H. Hermens,et al.  European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project , 1999 .

[15]  W J Kraemer,et al.  Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  R. Stein,et al.  Synchronization of human motor units: possible roles of exercise and supraspinal reflexes. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Activation of agonist and antagonist muscles at different joint angles during maximal isometric efforts , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[18]  J. Cram,et al.  Introduction to Surface Electromyography , 1998 .

[19]  O. Rutherford,et al.  The role of learning and coordination in strength training , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[20]  C. Reggiani,et al.  Myofibrillar ATPase activity during isometric contraction and isomyosin composition in rat single skinned muscle fibres. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  M. Pousson,et al.  Velocity-specific training in elbow flexors , 1999, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[22]  Stuart M Phillips,et al.  Short-term training: when do repeated bouts of resistance exercise become training? , 2000, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[23]  D. Sale,et al.  A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women , 1997, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[24]  H. Devries MUSCLES ALIVE-THEIR FUNCTIONS REVEALED BY ELECTROMYOGRAPHY , 1976 .

[25]  C. Heckman,et al.  Doublet potentiation during eccentric and concentric contractions of cat soleus muscle. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  R. Enoka Neuromechanics of Human Movement , 2001 .

[27]  M Solomonow,et al.  Electromyogram power spectra frequencies associated with motor unit recruitment strategies. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  K. Roeleveld,et al.  Inhomogeneities in muscle activation reveal motor unit recruitment. , 2005, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[29]  P. Komi Strength and Power in Sport , 1993 .