Design Principles for Sensing Particle Number Concentration and Mean Particle Size With Unipolar Diffusion Charging

Diffusion charging followed by particle capture and measurement is a promising method for determining particle number concentration of automotive exhaust. In addition, the method allows for the determination of a mean particle size, which is of high relevance with respect to health impacts. We investigate three different measurement configurations based on unipolar diffusion charging and electrostatic particle capture, using an analytical non-dimensional model, as well as a transient, multi-physical 3D model. The comprehensive modeling techniques enable prediction of the transient electrical current signals induced by the motion of charged aerosols. Comparison of the multi-physical modeling approach to analytical calculations and experimental data demonstrate model validation. The understanding gained from the modeling techniques enables a study of sensor design and calibration. Particle number concentration sensing is demonstrated for both a modulated precipitation configuration and a two-stage measurement configuration. With the latter, additional information on the mean particle size is extracted.

[1]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[2]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Field Measurement of Particle Size and Number Concentration with the Diffusion Size Classifier (Disc) , 2008 .

[3]  Nick Collings,et al.  Unipolar diffusion charging of aerosol particles in the transition regime , 2005 .

[4]  J. Brock,et al.  ON THE STOCHASTIC NATURE OF THE ACQUISITION OF ELECTRICAL CHARGE AND RADIOACTIVITY BY AEROSOL PARTICLES. , 1969 .

[5]  Mandy Berg,et al.  Aerosol Measurement Principles Techniques And Applications , 2016 .

[6]  Jim Euchner.  Design , 2014, Catalysis from A to Z.

[7]  L. Ntziachristos,et al.  Review of motor vehicle particulate emissions sampling and measurement: From smoke and filter mass to particle number , 2014 .

[8]  G. Mulholland,et al.  Calibration of a Condensation Particle Counter Using a NIST Traceable Method , 2009 .

[9]  J. Marra.  Using the Aerasense NanoTracer for simultaneously obtaining several ultrafine particle exposure metrics , 2011 .

[10]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Impact of selective catalytic reduction on exhaust particle formation over excess ammonia events. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[12]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Measuring number, mass, and size of exhaust particles with diffusion chargers: The dual Pegasor Particle Sensor , 2016 .

[13]  H. J. White,et al.  Particle Charging in Electrostatic Precipitation , 1951, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[14]  M. Maricq,et al.  Signature size distributions for diesel and gasoline engine exhaust particulate matter , 2001 .

[15]  Otto G. Raabe,et al.  Slip correction measurements of spherical solid aerosol particles in an improved Millikan apparatus , 1985 .

[16]  G. Smallwood,et al.  Demonstration of the CPMA-Electrometer System for Calibrating Black Carbon Particulate Mass Instruments , 2015 .

[17]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Aerosol Measurement by Induced Currents , 2014 .

[18]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Design, Calibration, and Field Performance of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier , 2011 .

[19]  S. Hochgreb,et al.  Modelling the effect of aerosol polydispersity on unipolar charging and measurement in low-cost sensors , 2019, Journal of Aerosol Science.