Spinal loads during two-person team lifting: effect of load mass distribution

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between load mass distribution (LMD) and spinal load during team lifting tasks. Two-person lifting teams were required to lift a box containing a mass of 30 or 60 kg from the floor to standing knuckle height. Adjusting the position of the centre of mass within the box by ±15 and ±7.5 cm relative to the evenly distributed position (0 cm) yielded three LMD ratios (69:31, 59:41 and 50:50), which represented the percentage of the total mass lifted by each team member. The external force acting on the hands and sagittal plane segmental kinematics were measured and used in a simple dynamic biomechanical model to calculate the torque, compression and shear forces experienced at L4/L5. Spinal load estimates (i.e. maximum and average L4/L5 torque, compression force and shear force) significantly increased with load mass and were positively correlated with LMD (r=0.86–0.99, p<0.05), indicating that the person at the heavier end of the asymmetrical load experienced higher spinal loads than their lifting partner. However, the asymmetry in spinal loads between the two team members was found to be significantly lower than the asymmetry in the LMD ratios. This result was primarily due to: (i) a significant positive correlation between LMD and the horizontal “pulling” force acting on the hand and (ii) a significant negative correlation between LMD and the moment arm of the vertical force acting through the hand relative to L4/L5. Thus, when lifting an unevenly balanced load a two-person lifting team seems to adopt a lifting strategy that partially alleviates the larger spinal loads experienced by the team member at the heavier end of the load.

[1]  R. Norman,et al.  Shear Happens! Suggested guidelines for ergonomists to reduce the risk of low back injury from shear loading , 1998 .

[2]  Thomas R. Waters,et al.  Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation , 1994 .

[3]  K P Granata,et al.  MRI-derived moment-arms of the female and male spine loading muscles. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Marilyn A. Sharp,et al.  Effects of Team Size on the Maximum Weight Bar Lifting Strength of Military Personnel , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[6]  K. S. Lee,et al.  A study of efficiency of two-man lifting work , 2001 .

[7]  S M McGill,et al.  Estimation of Force and Extensor Moment Contributions of the Disc and Ligaments at L4-L5 , 1988, Spine.

[8]  K P Granata,et al.  Spine loading and trunk kinematics during team lifting. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[9]  R. Barrett,et al.  Spinal loads during individual and team lifting , 2002, Ergonomics.

[10]  Marilyn A. Sharp,et al.  Prediction of Two-Person Team Lifting Capacity , 1995 .

[11]  W Karwowski,et al.  Isometric and isokinetic testing of lifting strength of males in teamwork. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[12]  B. Owen.  Preventing back injuries. , 1999, The American journal of nursing.

[13]  Anil Mital,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation of steel and composite access covers , 1995 .

[14]  W Karwowski,et al.  Testing of isometric and isokinetic lifting strengths of untrained females in teamwork. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[15]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[16]  Marilyn A. Sharp,et al.  Maximum Acceptable Load for Lifting and Carrying in Two-Person Teams , 1995 .

[17]  Rod Barrett,et al.  Spinal Loads During Two-person Team Lifting: Effect of Matched versus Unmatched Standing Height , 2003 .

[18]  B T Davies,et al.  Moving loads manually. , 1972, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Maximum Load Lifting Capacity of Males and Females in Teamwork , 1988 .