A comparison of two sourcing tactics for a new component

We compare two sourcing tactics for a manufacturer to purchase a new component to be used in a one-time production run of a new product with uncertain and price-elastic demand. One alternative is to issue a request-for-quote (RFQ), which is where the manufacturer requests a price-quantity schedule from suppliers. The manufacturer uses this information to determine a production quantity and the number of components to purchase from each supplier. The other alternative is to post a bid specifying how the manufacturer's purchase quantity will depend on the supplier's component price. The suppliers use this information to compete on quantity. We find that relative to RFQ, which is more challenging for the manufacturer to characterize the supplier response due to the possibility of supplier interaction, the benefit to the manufacturer from posting a bid increases with the number of suppliers due to increased intensity of competition. If the new component is from an emerging industry where there is little mutual awareness among candidate suppliers, then regardless of number of suppliers, expected manufacturer profit is higher under RFQ. Posting a bid is more likely to benefit the manufacturer when the new component is from a more established industry with a high degree of awareness among candidate suppliers.

[1]  Rajeev K. Tyagi,et al.  Do Strategic Conclusions Depend on how Price is Defined in Models of Distribution Channels? , 2005 .

[2]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Emerging multiple issue e-auctions , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Albert Y. Ha Supplier‐buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participation , 2001 .

[4]  Sandy D. Jap An Exploratory Study of the Introduction of Online Reverse Auctions , 2003 .

[5]  R. Staelin,et al.  Vertical Strategic Interaction: Implications for Channel Pricing Strategy , 1997 .

[6]  Maqbool Dada,et al.  Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions , 1999, Oper. Res..

[7]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Designing Supply Contracts: Contract Type and Information Asymmetry , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[8]  S. Chopra,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning & Operation , 2007 .

[9]  Steven M. Shugan,et al.  Managing Channel Profits , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[10]  Philip M. Kaminsky,et al.  Designing and managing the supply chain : concepts, strategies, and case studies , 2007 .

[11]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Sharing Imperfect Demand Information in Competing Supply Chains with Production Diseconomies , 2008 .

[12]  Steve Baron Retail and Marketing Channels: Economic and Marketing Perspectives on Producer-Distributor Relationships , 1990 .

[13]  E. Gal‐Or,et al.  First Mover and Second Mover Advantages , 1985 .

[14]  Wedad Elmaghraby,et al.  Supply Contract Competition and Sourcing Policies , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[15]  S. C. Choi,et al.  Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer , 1991 .

[16]  Krishnan S. Anand,et al.  Information and organization for horizontal multimarket coordination , 1997 .

[17]  J. R. Tony Arnold,et al.  Introduction to Materials Management , 1991 .

[18]  Hon-Shiang Lau,et al.  A stochastic and asymmetric-information framework for a dominant-manufacturer supply chain , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Supply chain practice and information sharing , 2007 .

[20]  M. Eichenbaum Some Empirical Evidence on the Production Level and Production Cost Smoothing Models of Inventory Investment , 1988 .

[21]  Steven M. Shugan Implicit Understandings in Channels of Distribution , 1985 .

[22]  Fangruo Chen,et al.  Information Sharing and Supply Chain Coordination , 2003, Supply Chain Management.