Improved spatial resolution and electrogram wave direction independence with the use of an orthogonal electrode configuration

To improve spatial resolution in recordings of intra-cardiac electrograms we characterized the utility of a novel configuration of two recording electrodes arranged perpendicularly to the endocardial surface. We hypothesized that this configuration denoted as orthogonal close unipolar (OCU) would combine advantages of conventional unipolar and contact bipolar (CBP) configurations. Electrical excitation was simulated in a computational model as arising from dipole current or from multi-wavelet reentry sources. Recordings were calculated for electrode tips 1 mm above the plane of the heart. Analogous recordings were obtained from swine hearts. Electrograms recorded with CBP showed strong dependence on orientation of the electrode pair with respect to the direction of spread of tissue excitation. By contrast, OCU recordings exhibited no directional dependence. OCU was significantly superior to CBP with respect to avoidance of far-field confounding of local tissue activity; the average far-field/near-field ratios for CBP and OCU were 0.09 and 0.05, respectively, for the simulated dipole current sources. In the swine hearts the ratios of ventricular to atrial signals for CBP and OCU were 0.15 ± 0.07 and 0.08 ± 0.09, respectively (p < 0.001). The difference between the actual dominant frequency in the tissue and that recorded by the electrodes was 0.44 ± 0.33 Hz for OCU, 0.58 ± 0.40 Hz for unipolar, and 0.62 ± 0.46 Hz for CBP. OCU confers improved spatial resolution compared with both unipolar and CBP electrode configurations. Unlike the case with CBP, OCU recordings are independent of excitation wave-front direction.

[1]  Robert Ploutz-Snyder,et al.  Mechanisms of Wave Fractionation at Boundaries of High-Frequency Excitation in the Posterior Left Atrium of the Isolated Sheep Heart During Atrial Fibrillation , 2006, Circulation.

[2]  Jason H T Bates,et al.  Emergence of Complex Behavior: An Interactive Model of Cardiac Excitation Provides a Powerful Tool for Understanding Electric Propagation , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[3]  Nicole Habel,et al.  Effects of electrode size and spacing on the resolution of intracardiac electrograms , 2012, Coronary artery disease.

[4]  J. Spear,et al.  A computer model of the electrogram: what causes fractionation? , 1988, Journal of electrocardiology.

[5]  P. Ursell,et al.  Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated electrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts. , 1985, Circulation.

[6]  Justin Stinnett-Donnelly,et al.  Electrogram Fractionation: The Relationship Between Spatiotemporal Variation of Tissue Excitation and Electrode Spatial Resolution , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[7]  Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar,et al.  Electrogram fractionation in murine HL-1 atrial monolayer model. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[8]  S Masse,et al.  A Comparison of Unipolar and Bipolar Electrodes During Cardiac Mapping Studies , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  S Furman,et al.  A Comparison of Unipolar and Bipolar Electrograms for Cardiac Pacemaker Sensing , 1977, Circulation.

[10]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Rotor meandering contributes to irregularity in electrograms during atrial fibrillation. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[11]  K. Nademanee,et al.  A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  José Jalife,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Breakdown of Wave Propagation Into Fibrillatory Conduction Across the Pectinate Muscle Network in the Isolated Sheep Right Atrium , 2002, Circulation research.

[13]  P Lander,et al.  Simulation of intracardiac electrograms with a moving dipole source. Role of electrode geometry and high-pass filtering. , 1994, Journal of electrocardiology.

[14]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC , 2013 .