Ability versus Personality

All hospitality operators want employees who can learn their jobs quickly and have personality traits that allow them to maintain their performance over time. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to find individuals who possess all of the desirable attributes, and thus, some degree of compromise is generally required. The prevailing view is to select those with great personalities and then train them for the technical job requirements. However, strict adherence to this perspective is not advisable. The study presented in this article found that both general mental ability and conscientiousness are important for predicting the performance of restaurant employees on the front line. Moreover, it appears that these two individual characteristics are important at different stages of an employee's job tenure. Using data from 241 line-level restaurant employees, the study found that general mental ability was a better predictor of performance for new employees, whereas conscientiousness was a better predictor of performance for experienced employees. These findings have direct implications for staffing decisions, as well as new employee training and development and performance management.

[1]  Kenneth G. Brown,et al.  Seven common misconceptions about human resource practices: Research findings versus practitioner beliefs , 2002 .

[2]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Joint venture dissolution as corporate divorce , 2002 .

[3]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  Degradation of validity over time: a test and extension of Ackerman's model. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  The stability of validity coefficients over time: Ackerman's (1988) model and the general aptitude test battery. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  H. G. Osburn,et al.  A Review and Extension of Current Models of Dynamic Criteria , 2000 .

[7]  Orlando Behling,et al.  Employee selection: Will intelligence and conscientiousness do the job? , 1998 .

[8]  M. Mumford,et al.  O*NET Final Technical Report. Volume I [and] Volume II [and] Volume III. , 1997 .

[9]  Malcolm James Ree,et al.  Intelligence Is the Best Predictor of Job Performance , 1992 .

[10]  P. Ackerman.  Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. , 1988 .

[11]  P. Ackerman.  Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. , 1987 .

[12]  J. Hunter.  Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance , 1986 .

[13]  P. Ackerman.  Individual differences in information processing: An investigation of intellectual abilities and task performance during practice ☆ , 1986 .

[14]  Michael P. Kirsch,et al.  METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS , 1984 .

[15]  J. Hunter,et al.  Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance , 1984 .

[16]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  On the relation between abilities, learning, and human performance. , 1972 .

[17]  P. Costa,et al.  The five-factor theory of personality. , 2008 .

[18]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[19]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  Adding a Dimension: Time as a Factor in the Generalizability of Predictive Relationships , 1990 .

[20]  R L Helmreich,et al.  The honeymoon effect in job performance: temporal increases in the predictive power of achievement motivation. , 1986, The Journal of applied psychology.