The need for speed: informed land acquisitions for conservation in a dynamic property market.

Land acquisition is a common approach to biodiversity conservation but is typically subject to property availability on the public market. Consequently, conservation plans are often unable to be implemented as intended. When properties come on the market, conservation agencies must make a choice: purchase immediately, often without a detailed knowledge of its biodiversity value; survey the parcel and accept the risk that it may be removed from the market during this process; or not purchase and hope a better parcel comes on the market at a later date. We describe both an optimal method, using stochastic dynamic programming, and a simple rule of thumb for making such decisions. The solutions to this problem illustrate how optimal conservation is necessarily dynamic and requires explicit consideration of both the time period allowed for implementation and the availability of properties.

[1]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  S. Andelman,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity Efficiently: What to Do, Where, and When , 2007, PLoS biology.

[3]  R. Cowling,et al.  Embracing Opportunism in the Selection of Priority Conservation Areas , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  The optimal dynamic allocation of conservation funds under financial uncertainty , 2007 .

[5]  Sahotra Sarkar,et al.  The cost of postponing biodiversity conservation in Mexico , 2007 .

[6]  Peter W J Baxter,et al.  Optimal eradication: when to stop looking for an invasive plant. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[7]  Bo Jellesmark Thorsen,et al.  Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world , 2006 .

[8]  Michael Drielsma,et al.  Landscape scenario modelling of vegetation condition , 2006 .

[9]  Will R Turner,et al.  Adaptive Decision Rules for the Acquisition of Nature Reserves , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  David A. Newburn,et al.  Economics and Land‐Use Change in Prioritizing Private Land Conservation , 2005 .

[11]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Biodiversity: Turning up the heat on hotspots , 2005, Nature.

[12]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Metropolitan Open‐Space Protection with Uncertain Site Availability , 2005 .

[13]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world , 2004 .

[14]  S. Polasky,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection , 2004 .

[15]  Lesley F. Wright,et al.  Information Gap Decision Theory: Decisions under Severe Uncertainty , 2004 .

[16]  G. Guthey,et al.  Land Trusts and Conservation Easements: Who Is Conserving What for Whom? , 2004 .

[17]  S. Dhami.  ECONOMICS OF INFORMATION , 2004 .

[18]  Magnus Nyström,et al.  Reserves, Resilience and Dynamic Landscapes , 2003, Ambio.

[19]  Mark A. Botha,et al.  Evaluating combinations of on-and off-reserve conservation strategies for the Agulhas Plain, South Africa: a financial perspective , 2003 .

[20]  A. Gill,et al.  Using stochastic dynamic programming to determine optimal fire management for Banksia ornata , 2001 .

[21]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[22]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Private Lands: The Neglected Geography , 1999 .

[23]  H. Possingham,et al.  The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation , 1993 .

[24]  Thomas S. Ferguson,et al.  Who Solved the Secretary Problem , 1989 .

[25]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology , 2019 .

[26]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Strategic Search Theory , 1982 .

[27]  J. McCall.  Economics of Information and Job Search , 1970 .