DEA for Two-Stage Networks: Efficiency Decompositions and Modeling Techniques

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for identifying best practices among peer decision making units (DMUs). An important area of development in recent years has been that devoted to applications wherein DMUs represent network processes. One particular subset of such processes is those in which all the outputs from the first stage become inputs to the second stage. We call these types of DMU structures “two-stage networks”. Existing approaches in modeling efficiency of two-stage networks can be categorized as using either Stackelberg (leader-follower), or cooperative game concepts. There are two types of efficiency decomposition; multiplicative and additive. In multiplicative efficiency decomposition, the overall efficiency is defined as a product of the two individual stages’ efficiency scores, whereas in additive efficiency decomposition, the overall efficiency is defined as a weighted average of the two individual stages’ efficiency scores. We discuss modeling techniques used for solving two-stage network DEA models in linear programs.

[1]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Integrated data envelopment analysis: Global vs. local optimum , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[3]  William L. Weber,et al.  A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs , 2010 .

[4]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data envelopment analysis efficiency in two-stage networks with feedback , 2011 .

[8]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  K. Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2010 .

[11]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Dual-role factors in data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[12]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks , 2008 .

[13]  W. Cook,et al.  Sales performance measurement in bank branches , 2001 .

[14]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Best-performing US mutual fund families from 1993 to 2008: Evidence from a novel two-stage DEA model for efficiency decomposition , 2012 .

[15]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[16]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Rolf Färe,et al.  AN INTERMEDIATE INPUT MODEL OF DAIRY PRODUCTION USING COMPLEX SURVEY DATA , 1995 .

[19]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in assessing Information Technology impact on firm performance , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[20]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Walter Ukovich,et al.  DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Zhimin Huang,et al.  Co-op advertising models in manufacturer-retailer supply chains: A game theory approach , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[25]  Herbert F. Lewis,et al.  Two-Stage DEA: An Application to Major League Baseball , 2003 .

[26]  Yongjun Li,et al.  DEA Models for Extended Two-Stage Network Structures , 2012 .

[27]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[28]  R. Färe,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY AND INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS: A FRONTIER APPROACH , 1995 .

[29]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Hamid Noori,et al.  A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  Opening the black box of efficiency analysis: An illustration with UAE banks , 2009 .

[32]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring Information Technology's Indirect Impact on Firm Performance , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[33]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition , 2008 .

[34]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[35]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model , 2008 .