Release from implicit interference in memory and metamemory: older adults know that they can't let go.

Cued recall performance is better when cue and targets have a small number of semantic associates, which is an effect of implicit interference from shared associates ( Nelson, McKinney, Gee, & Janczura, 1998). The present study examined age-related effects on memory under conditions of implicit interference. Recall and recognition performance of both younger and older adults was evaluated for small- versus large-set-size cues under two contexts. Comparable cue-set-size effects were obtained for both age groups under extralist cueing, but they were eliminated only for younger adults under intralist cueing. Older adults were not able to use the context to effectively eliminate implicit interference from associates of the cue as did younger adults, perhaps because of an inhibition deficit. Both groups had equivalent metamemory accuracy and sensitivity, indicating that the monitoring of learning prior to a test reflected the effects of implicit interference and is not impaired by aging.

[1]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions , 1984 .

[2]  The roles of competition, target accessibility, and cue familiarity in metamemory for word pairs. , 1999 .

[3]  Deborah K. Eakin,et al.  Illusions of knowing: Metamemory and memory under conditions of retroactive interference , 2005 .

[4]  L. Hasher,et al.  Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. , 1994 .

[5]  D. Nelson,et al.  Implicit processing in the cued recall of young and old adults. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[6]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  Effects of target set sizeon feelings of knowing and cued recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness andpartial-retrieval hypotheses , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[7]  A. Koriat.  Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .

[8]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Measuring strategy production during associative learning: The relative utility of concurrent versus retrospective reports , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[10]  M. Folstein,et al.  Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) , 2019, Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging.

[11]  Leonard W. Poon,et al.  Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life , 1989 .

[12]  D. Nelson,et al.  Age effects in cued recall : sources from implicit and explicit memory , 1995 .

[13]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Aging and monitoring associative learning: is monitoring accuracy spared or impaired? , 2002 .

[15]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Aging and deficits in associative memory: what is the role of strategy production? , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[16]  E. Lovelace,et al.  Free associations of older adults to single words and conceptually related word triads. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.

[17]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The relation between feelings of knowing and the number of neighboring concepts linked to the test cue , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[18]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[19]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[20]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[21]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Encoding context and set size. , 1979 .

[22]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Training monitoring skills improves older adults' self-paced associative learning. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[23]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  On the use of word association norms in aging research. , 1983, Experimental aging research.

[25]  Word associations in old age: Evidence for consistency in semantic encoding during adulthood. , 1986 .

[26]  L. Bäckman.  Everyday cognition in adulthood and late life: Varieties of memory compensation by older adults in episodic remembering , 1989 .

[27]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect” , 1991 .

[28]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Older adults’ associative deficit in episodic memory: Assessing the role of decline in attentional resources , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .

[30]  R. Bjork,et al.  Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Christopher Hertzog,et al.  Metacognitive development in adulthood and old age. , 1994 .

[32]  M. Isingrini,et al.  Aging, episodic memory feeling-of-knowing, and frontal functioning. , 2000, Neuropsychology.

[33]  D. Nelson,et al.  What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  D. Kausler.  Learning and memory in normal aging , 1994 .

[35]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  The contribution of mediator-based deficiencies to age differences in associative learning. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[36]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. , 1998 .

[37]  W. C. Shipley.  A Self-Administering Scale for Measuring Intellectual Impairment and Deterioration , 1940 .

[38]  C. C. Chandler,et al.  Studying related pictures can reduce accuracy, but increase confidence, in a modified recognition test , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Cathy L. McEvoy,et al.  Aging and Inhibition of Unconsciously Processed Information: No Apparent Deficit , 1996 .

[40]  Douglas L. Nelson,et al.  Encoding context and retrieval conditions as determinants of the effects of natural category size. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  G R Marsh,et al.  Prediction and evaluation of memory performance by young and old adults. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[42]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[43]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .