Integrating Model-Based Learning and Animations for Enhancing Students’ Understanding of Proteins Structure and Function

This paper describes a study conducted in the context of chemistry education reforms in Israel. The study examined a new biochemistry learning unit that was developed to promote in-depth understanding of 3D structures and functions of proteins and nucleic acids. Our goal was to examine whether, and to what extent teaching and learning via model-based learning and animations of biomolecules affect students’ chemical understanding. Applying the mixed methods research paradigm, pre- and post-questionnaires as well as class-observations were employed in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. The research population included 175 grade twelve students, divided into three research groups: (a) hands-on exploration of animations, (b) teacher’s demonstrations of animations, (c) traditional learning using textbooks. Findings indicated that the integration of model-based learning and 3D animations enhanced students’ understanding of proteins’ structure and function and their ability to transfer across different levels of chemistry understanding. Findings also indicated that teachers’ demonstrations of animations may enhance students’ ‘knowledge’—a low order thinking skill; however, in order to enhance higher levels of thinking, students should be able to explore 3D animations on their own. Applying constructivist and interpretative analysis of the data, three themes were raised, corresponding to cognitive, affective, and social aspects of learning while exploring web-based models and animations.

[1]  P. Shah,et al.  Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning , 2004 .

[2]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[3]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Enhancing Undergraduate Students' Chemistry Understanding through Project-Based Learning in an IT Environment , 2005 .

[4]  Barbara C. Buckley Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology , 2000 .

[5]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Visualization: A Metacognitive Skill in Science and Science Education , 2005 .

[6]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[7]  Janice D. Gobert,et al.  Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education , 2000 .

[8]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Question Posing, Inquiry, and Modeling Skills of Chemistry Students in the Case-Based Computerized Laboratory Environment , 2009 .

[9]  John J. Clement,et al.  Step-Wise Evolution of Mental Models of Electric C ircuits: A "Learning-Aloud" Case Study , 2002 .

[10]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Folk theories of “inquiry:” How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method , 2004 .

[11]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[12]  D. Gabel,et al.  The Complexity of Chemistry and Implications for Teaching , 1998 .

[13]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second Edition. , 2000 .

[14]  D. Ardaç,et al.  Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change , 2004 .

[15]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[16]  Haim Eshach,et al.  Science Literacy in Primary Schools and Pre-Schools , 2006 .

[17]  Chris Dede,et al.  Model-Based Teaching and Learning with BioLogica™: What Do They Learn? How Do They Learn? How Do We Know? , 2004 .

[18]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[19]  J. P. Byrnes,et al.  Cognitive Development and Learning in Instructional Contexts , 1995 .

[20]  Hsiao-Ching She,et al.  Fostering radical conceptual change through Dual-Situated Learning Model , 2004 .

[21]  David F. Treagust,et al.  An Evaluation of a Teaching Intervention to Promote Students’ Ability to Use Multiple Levels of Representation When Describing and Explaining Chemical Reactions , 2008 .

[22]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[23]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[24]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  A Web-Based Chemistry Course as a Means To Foster Freshmen Learning , 2003 .

[25]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Secondary Students' Dynamic Modeling Processes: Analyzing, Reasoning About, Synthesizing, and Testing Models of Stream Ecosystems , 1997 .

[26]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  Applying the science of learning to university teaching and beyond , 2002 .

[27]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[28]  Bertrand M. T. Lin,et al.  An effective approach for test-sheet composition with large-scale item banks , 2006 .

[29]  D. Treagust,et al.  Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning , 2003 .

[30]  Anat Yarden,et al.  Learning Using Dynamic and Static Visualizations: Students’ Comprehension, Prior Knowledge and Conceptual Status of a Biotechnological Method , 2010 .

[31]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[32]  E. Glasersfeld Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. , 1995 .

[33]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[34]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Science Education in Primary Schools: Is an Animation Worth a Thousand Pictures? , 2011 .

[35]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[36]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Expert Models and Modeling Processes Associated with a Computer-Modeling Tool , 2006 .

[37]  Richard K. Coll,et al.  The role of models/and analogies in science education: implications from research , 2005 .

[38]  Miri Barak,et al.  Transforming an Introductory Programming Course: From Lectures to Active Learning via Wireless Laptops , 2007 .

[39]  R. Mayer Cognitive Theory and the Design of Multimedia Instruction: An Example of the Two‐Way Street Between Cognition and Instruction , 2002 .

[40]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[41]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems: Symbol, macro, micro, and process aspects , 2003 .

[42]  N. Denzin,et al.  The discipline and practice of qualitative research [Introduction]. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed. , 2000 .

[43]  J. Bruner Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[44]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning Science and the Science of Learning , 1988 .

[45]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Role of Spatial Reasoning in Engineering and the Design of Spatial Instruction , 1997 .

[46]  J. Piaget Science of education and the psychology of the child , 1970 .

[47]  Ramón Rubio García,et al.  Interactive multimedia animation with Macromedia Flash in Descriptive Geometry teaching , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[48]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Visualization in science education , 2005 .

[49]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students' thinking and motivation , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[50]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends , 2003 .