Statistical control in correlational studies: 10 essential recommendations for organizational researchers.

Summary Statistical control is widely used in correlational studies with the intent of providing more accurate estimates of relationships among variables, more conservative tests of hypotheses, or ruling out alternative explanations for empirical findings. However, the use of control variables can produce uninterpretable parameter estimates, erroneous inferences, irreplicable results, and other barriers to scientific progress. As a result, methodologists have provided a great deal of advice regarding the use of statistical control, to the point that researchers might have difficulties sifting through and prioritizing the available suggestions. We integrate and condense this literature into a set of 10 essential recommendations that are generally applicable and which, if followed, would substantially enhance the quality of published organizational research. We provide explanations, qualifications, and examples following each recommendation. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jeremy B. Bernerth,et al.  A Critical Review and Best‐Practice Recommendations for Control Variable Usage , 2016 .

[2]  Thomas A. O’Neill,et al.  Current misuses of multiple regression for investigating bivariate hypotheses: an example from the organizational domain , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[3]  Barbara J. Bird,et al.  Control variables: use, misuse and recommended use , 2014 .

[4]  Kim F. Nimon,et al.  Understanding the Results of Multiple Linear Regression , 2013 .

[5]  Kevin D. Carlson,et al.  The Illusion of Statistical Control , 2012 .

[6]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  Control Variable Use and Reporting in Macro and Micro Management Research , 2012 .

[7]  Kevin D. Carlson,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Convergent Validity on Research Results , 2012 .

[8]  FROM THE EDITORS PUBLISHING IN AMJ — PART 5 : CRAFTING THE METHODS AND RESULTS , 2012 .

[9]  Gerry McNamara,et al.  Publishing in AMJ—Part 2: Research Design , 2011 .

[10]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Methodological Urban Legends: The Misuse of Statistical Control Variables , 2011 .

[11]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  12 Structural Equation Modeling in Management Research: A Guide for Improved Analysis , 2009 .

[12]  J. Diefendorff,et al.  Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: a multilevel investigation. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  J. Breaugh.  Important considerations in using statistical procedures to control for nuisance variables in non-experimental studies , 2008 .

[14]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  To prosper, organizational psychology should … overcome methodological barriers to progress , 2008 .

[15]  Douglas G. Bonett,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being as Nonadditive Predictors of Workplace Turnover , 2007 .

[16]  Thomas E. Becker.  Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational Research: A Qualitative Analysis With Recommendations , 2005 .

[17]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: don't throw out the baby with the bath water , 2000, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[19]  Eva Petkova,et al.  SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED REGRESSION Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients between Models1 , 1995 .

[20]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[21]  Paul E. Meehl,et al.  High school yearbooks: A reply to Schwarz. , 1971 .

[22]  Paul E. Meehl,et al.  Nuisance variables and the ex post facto design , 1970 .

[23]  B. S. Burks.  On the inadequacy of the partial and multiple correlation technique. , 1926 .