An approach to computing marginal land use change carbon intensities for bioenergy in policy applications

Accurately characterizing the emissions implications of bioenergy is increasingly important to the design of regional and global greenhouse gas mitigation policies. Market-based policies, in particular, often use information about carbon intensity to adjust relative deployment incentives for different energy sources. However, the carbon intensity of bioenergy is difficult to quantify because carbon emissions can occur when land use changes to expand production of bioenergy crops rather than simply when the fuel is consumed as for fossil fuels. Using a long-term, integrated assessment model, this paper develops an approach for computing the carbon intensity of bioenergy production that isolates the marginal impact of increasing production of a specific bioenergy crop in a specific region, taking into account economic competition among land uses. We explore several factors that affect emissions intensity and explain these results in the context of previous studies that use different approaches. Among the factors explored, our results suggest that the carbon intensity of bioenergy production from land use change (LUC) differs by a factor of two depending on the region in which the bioenergy crop is grown in the United States. Assumptions about international land use policies (such as those related to forest protection) and crop yields also significantly impact carbon intensity. Finally, we develop and demonstrate a generalized method for considering the varying time profile of LUC emissions from bioenergy production, taking into account the time path of future carbon prices, the discount rate and the time horizon. When evaluated in the context of power sector applications, we found electricity from bioenergy crops to be less carbon-intensive than conventional coal-fired electricity generation and often less carbon-intensive than natural-gas fired generation.

[1]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Global Energy: Assessing the Future , 1985 .

[2]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Potential Land Use Implications of a Global Biofuels Industry , 2007 .

[3]  K. Calvin,et al.  GCAM 3.0 Agriculture and Land Use: Technical Description of Modeling Approach , 2011 .

[4]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Using land to mitigate climate change: hitting the target, recognizing the trade-offs. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Biomass Production in Switchgrass across the United States: Database Description and Determinants of Yield , 2010 .

[6]  Thomas W. Hertel,et al.  Global Agricultural Land Use Data for Climate Change Analysis , 2008, GTAP Working Paper.

[7]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  U.S. Billion-ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry , 2011 .

[8]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels’ greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum , 2009 .

[9]  D. McFadden Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice , 1981 .

[10]  Navin Ramankutty,et al.  Land cover change over the last three centuries due to human activities: The availability of new global data sets , 2004 .

[11]  James A. Edmonds,et al.  ECONOMIC AND PHYSICAL MODELING OF LAND USE IN GCAM 3.0 AND AN APPLICATION TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY, LAND, AND TERRESTRIAL CARBON , 2014 .

[12]  K. Calvin,et al.  GCAM 3.0 Agriculture and Land Use: Data Sources and Methods , 2011 .

[13]  J. Edmonds,et al.  RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100 , 2011 .

[14]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Implications of Limiting CO2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy , 2009, Science.

[15]  James J. Dooley,et al.  The Potential Role of Biotechnology in Addressing the Long-Term Problem of Climate Change in the Context of Global Energy and Economic Systems , 2003 .

[16]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of corn and cellulosic ethanol with technology improvements and land use changes , 2011 .

[17]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Large-scale utilization of biomass energy and carbon dioxide capture and storage in the transport and electricity sectors under stringent CO2 concentration limit scenarios , 2010 .

[18]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[19]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992 , 1999 .

[20]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[21]  R. Houghton The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990* , 1999 .

[22]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[23]  R. Beach,et al.  U.S. agricultural and forestry impacts of the Energy Independence and Security Act: FASOM results and model description. Final report , 2009 .

[24]  A. Faaij,et al.  Fischer–Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: a carbon, energy flow and cost analysis , 2009 .

[25]  J. Melillo,et al.  Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important? , 2009, Science.

[26]  E. Robert,et al.  Indirect Land Use Change From Increased Biofuels Demand - Comparison of Models and Results for Marginal Biofuels Production from Different Feedstocks , 2010 .

[27]  English Only THE USE AND EXCHANGE OF MICROBIAL GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE Submission by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , 2010 .

[28]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-Mediated Responses , 2010 .