Effects of lateral head tilt on user perceptions of humanoid and android robots

Three humanlike robots were depicted with different head postures.Robots with lateral head tilts were rated more humanlike by human observers.Head tilts also increased perceptions of robot cuteness and spine-tinglingness.Interactive effects of robot appearance and head posture were revealed.Robot head postures did not influence user perceptions of dominance and eeriness. Human responses to android and humanoid robots have become an important topic to social scientists due to the increasing prevalence of social and service robots in everyday life. The present research connects work on the effects of lateral (sideward) head tilts, an eminent feature of nonverbal human behavior, to the experience of android and humanoid robots. In two experiments (N=402; N=253) the influence of lateral head tilts on user perceptions of android and humanoid robots were examined. Photo portrayals of three different robots (Asimo, Kojiro, Telenoid) were manipulated. The stimuli included head tilts of -20?, -10? (left tilt), +10?, +20? (right tilt) and 0? (upright position). Compared to an upright head posture, we found higher scores for attributed human likeness, cuteness, and spine-tinglingness when the identical robots conveyed a head tilt. Results for perceived warmth, eeriness, attractiveness, and dominance varied with the robot or head tilts yielded no effects. Implications for the development and marketing of android and humanoid robots are discussed.

[1]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Working with robots and objects: revisiting deictic reference for achieving spatial common ground , 2006, HRI '06.

[2]  C. Izard.  The face of emotion , 1971 .

[3]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Jacques Penders,et al.  The rise of robots , 2014 .

[5]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[6]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Generation of nodding, head tilting and eye gazing for human-robot dialogue interaction , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[7]  Takashi Minato,et al.  Telenoid: tele-presence android for communication , 2011, SIGGRAPH '11.

[8]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Kenichi Ogawa,et al.  Honda humanoid robots development , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Lucas A. Keefer.  Is There Anybody Out There? Trait Anthropomorphism Predicts the Psychological Benefits of a Favorite Belonging , 2016 .

[11]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Manwatching: A field guide to human behavior. , 1978 .

[12]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[13]  G. Bente,et al.  Is there anybody out there? Analyzing the effects of embodiment and nonverbal behavior in avatar-mediated communication , 2008 .

[14]  Claudia Wagner,et al.  Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: A case study , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[15]  D B Givens,et al.  The nonverbal basis of attraction: flirtation, courtship, and seduction. , 1978, Psychiatry.

[16]  P. Ekman,et al.  Detecting deception from the body or face. , 1974 .

[17]  Guy L. Lacroix,et al.  Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  T. Takenaka,et al.  The development of Honda humanoid robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[19]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  Geminoid: Teleoperated Android of an Existing Person , 2007 .

[22]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research , 2006 .

[23]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[24]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication , 2018, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[25]  K. Yamazaki,et al.  Coordination of verbal and non-verbal actions in human―robot interaction at museums and exhibitions , 2010 .

[26]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope Vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversational Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[27]  B. Gates.  A robot in every home. , 2007, Scientific American.

[28]  N. Henley,et al.  Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication , 1977 .

[29]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction , 2004 .

[30]  Markus Appel,et al.  Science fiction reduces the eeriness of android robots: A field experiment , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Categorization difficulty is associated with negative evaluation in the “uncanny valley” phenomenon , 2013 .

[32]  A. Manstead,et al.  Temporal Aspects of Facial Displays in Person and Expression Perception: The Effects of Smile Dynamics, Head-tilt, and Gender , 2007 .

[33]  A. Halberstadt,et al.  Gender, nonverbal behavior, and perceived dominance: A test of the theory. , 1987 .

[34]  W. McGrew.  An ethological study of children's behavior , 1972 .

[35]  Marco Costa,et al.  Head Canting in Paintings: An Historical Study , 2001 .

[36]  Chris McKay.  Is there anybody out there? , 2010, Nature.

[37]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  Museum guide robot based on sociological interaction analysis , 2007, CHI.

[38]  Jessica L. Tracy,et al.  Show Your Pride , 2004, Psychological science.

[39]  I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt.  Ethology, the biology of behavior , 1970 .

[40]  D. Keltner.  Signs of appeasement: evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame , 1995 .

[41]  P. Ekman,et al.  Facial signs of emotional experience. , 1980 .

[42]  N. Haslam.  Dehumanization: An Integrative Review , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[43]  Britta Wrede,et al.  Towards a typology of meaningful signals and cues in social robotics , 2011, 2011 RO-MAN.

[44]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  An advanced musculoskeletal humanoid Kojiro , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[45]  I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt.  The Biological Foundation of Aesthetics , 1988 .

[46]  E. Otta,et al.  The effect of smiling and of head tilting on person perception. , 1994, The Journal of psychology.

[47]  R. Gur,et al.  Baby Schema in Infant Faces Induces Cuteness Perception and Motivation for Caretaking in Adults. , 2009, Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[48]  P. E. Bitti,et al.  Face-ism effect and head canting in one's own and others' photographs , 2000 .

[49]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[50]  Susan Bell Trickett,et al.  Social Engagement in Public Places: A Tale of One Robot , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[51]  F. Eyssel,et al.  Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. , 2012, The British journal of social psychology.

[52]  Zishan Khan.  Rise of the Robots , 2011 .

[53]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[54]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .

[55]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[56]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  To Err is Human(-like): Effects of Robot Gesture on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Likability , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.