PEX5 and Ubiquitin Dynamics on Mammalian Peroxisome Membranes

Peroxisomes are membrane-bound organelles within eukaryotic cells that post-translationally import folded proteins into their matrix. Matrix protein import requires a shuttle receptor protein, usually PEX5, that cycles through docking with the peroxisomal membrane, ubiquitination, and export back into the cytosol followed by deubiquitination. Matrix proteins associate with PEX5 in the cytosol and are translocated into the peroxisome lumen during the PEX5 cycle. This cargo translocation step is not well understood, and its energetics remain controversial. We use stochastic computational models to explore different ways the AAA ATPase driven removal of PEX5 may couple with cargo translocation in peroxisomal importers of mammalian cells. The first model considered is uncoupled, in which translocation is spontaneous, and does not immediately depend on PEX5 removal. The second is directly coupled, in which cargo translocation only occurs when its PEX5 is removed from the peroxisomal membrane. The third, novel, model is cooperatively coupled and requires two PEX5 on a given importomer for cargo translocation — one PEX5 with associated cargo and one with ubiquitin. We measure both the PEX5 and the ubiquitin levels on the peroxisomes as we vary the matrix protein cargo addition rate into the cytosol. We find that both uncoupled and directly coupled translocation behave identically with respect to PEX5 and ubiquitin, and the peroxisomal ubiquitin signal increases as the matrix protein traffic increases. In contrast, cooperatively coupled translocation behaves dramatically differently, with a ubiquitin signal that decreases with increasing matrix protein traffic. Recent work has shown that ubiquitin on mammalian peroxisome membranes can lead to selective degradation by autophagy, or ‘pexophagy.’ Therefore, the high ubiquitin level for low matrix cargo traffic with cooperatively coupled protein translocation could be used as a disuse signal to mediate pexophagy. This mechanism may be one way that cells could regulate peroxisome numbers.

[1]  W. Webb,et al.  Lateral diffusion of membrane lipid-anchored probes before and after aggregation of cell surface IgE-receptors , 2003 .

[2]  Harald W. Platta,et al.  Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p. , 2004, The Biochemical journal.

[3]  K. Rosenkranz,et al.  Functional association of the AAA complex and the peroxisomal importomer , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[4]  H. Erickson Size and Shape of Protein Molecules at the Nanometer Level Determined by Sedimentation, Gel Filtration, and Electron Microscopy , 2009, Biological Procedures Online.

[5]  H. Waterham,et al.  Genetics and molecular basis of human peroxisome biogenesis disorders. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  C. Landgraf,et al.  Identification of a Novel, Intraperoxisomal Pex14-Binding Site in Pex13: Association of Pex13 with the Docking Complex Is Essential for Peroxisomal Matrix Protein Import , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[7]  Harald W. Platta,et al.  Cysteine-dependent Ubiquitination of Pex18p Is Linked to Cargo Translocation across the Peroxisomal Membrane* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  R. Vierstra,et al.  Identification of a Family of Closely Related Human Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzymes (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  R. Hess,et al.  NATURE OF THE HEPATOMEGALIC EFFECT PRODUCED BY ETHYL-CHLOROPHENOXY-ISOBUTYRATE IN THE RAT , 1965, Nature.

[10]  Ronald J A Wanders,et al.  Biochemistry of mammalian peroxisomes revisited. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[11]  Ralf Erdmann,et al.  Peroxisomal dynamics. , 2007, Trends in cell biology.

[12]  M. van den Berg,et al.  A Conserved Cysteine Is Essential for Pex4p-dependent Ubiquitination of the Peroxisomal Import Receptor Pex5p* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  S. Yokota Degradation of normal and proliferated peroxisomes in rat hepatocytes: Regulation of peroxisomes quantity in cells , 2003, Microscopy research and technique.

[14]  Harald W. Platta,et al.  Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p is required for its recycling , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  M. Schrader,et al.  The peroxisome: still a mysterious organelle , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[16]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[17]  T. Ueno,et al.  Peroxisome degradation in mammals , 2011, IUBMB life.

[18]  C. Grou,et al.  The peroxisomal protein import machinery – a case report of transient ubiquitination with a new flavor , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[19]  J. Kiel,et al.  Ubiquitination of the Peroxisomal Targeting Signal Type 1 Receptor, Pex5p, Suggests the Presence of a Quality Control Mechanism during Peroxisomal Matrix Protein Import* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  H. Pelham,et al.  Slow Diffusion of Proteins in the Yeast Plasma Membrane Allows Polarity to Be Maintained by Endocytic Cycling , 2003, Current Biology.

[21]  Jorge E Azevedo,et al.  Characterization of Peroxisomal Pex5p from Rat Liver , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  M. Osumi,et al.  Degradation and turnover of peroxisomes in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha induced by selective inactivation of peroxisomal enzymes , 1983, Archives of Microbiology.

[23]  M. Fransen,et al.  Mapping the Cargo Protein Membrane Translocation Step into the PEX5 Cycling Pathway*♦ , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Carla P. Guimarães,et al.  Insertion of Pex5p into the Peroxisomal Membrane Is Cargo Protein-dependent* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  R. Youle,et al.  Role of PINK1 binding to the TOM complex and alternate intracellular membranes in recruitment and activation of the E3 ligase Parkin. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[26]  Kay Hofmann,et al.  Selective autophagy: ubiquitin-mediated recognition and beyond , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  Harald W. Platta,et al.  The exportomer: the peroxisomal receptor export machinery , 2012, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[28]  G. Los,et al.  Peroxisome Dynamics in Cultured Mammalian Cells , 2009, Traffic.

[29]  K. Okumoto,et al.  Pex5p stabilizes Pex14p: a study using a newly isolated pex5 CHO cell mutant, ZPEG101. , 2013, The Biochemical journal.

[30]  J. Corton,et al.  Gene Expression Profiling in Wild-Type and PPARα-Null Mice Exposed to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Reveals PPARα-Independent Effects , 2010, PPAR research.

[31]  W. Schliebs,et al.  Pex14p, more than just a docking protein. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  NBR1 acts as an autophagy receptor for peroxisomes , 2013, Journal of Cell Science.

[33]  B. Agianian,et al.  Recombinant Human Peroxisomal Targeting Signal Receptor PEX5 , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  P. Domingues,et al.  Identification of Ubiquitin-specific Protease 9X (USP9X) as a Deubiquitinase Acting on Ubiquitin-Peroxin 5 (PEX5) Thioester Conjugate* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  Y. Fujiki,et al.  In vitro import of peroxisome-targeting signal type 2 (PTS2) receptor Pex7p into peroxisomes. , 2009, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[36]  Y. Fujiki,et al.  Shuttling Mechanism of Peroxisome Targeting Signal Type 1 Receptor Pex5: ATP-Independent Import and ATP-Dependent Export , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Excess Peroxisomes Are Degraded by Autophagic Machinery in Mammals* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  D. Svergun,et al.  Solution Structure of Human Pex5·Pex14·PTS1 Protein Complexes Obtained by Small Angle X-ray Scattering , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  R. Tonge,et al.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of mouse liver response to the peroxisome proliferator diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP) , 2001, Archives of Toxicology.

[40]  S. Subramani,et al.  Recent advances in peroxisomal matrix protein import. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[41]  I. J. van der Klei,et al.  Pexophagy-linked degradation of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3p involves the ubiquitin-proteasome system. , 2013, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[42]  M. Fransen,et al.  Peroxisome degradation in mammals: mechanisms of action, recent advances, and perspectives , 2013, Front. Physiol..

[43]  Eugenio Marco,et al.  Endocytosis Optimizes the Dynamic Localization of Membrane Proteins that Regulate Cortical Polarity , 2007, Cell.

[44]  Michael Müller,et al.  Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Target Genes , 2010, PPAR research.

[45]  W. Schliebs,et al.  Peroxisomal protein import and ERAD: variations on a common theme , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[46]  S. Gould,et al.  Multiple PEX genes are required for proper subcellular distribution and stability of Pex5p, the PTS1 receptor: evidence that PTS1 protein import is mediated by a cycling receptor , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  M. Scheffner,et al.  Identification of a human ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme that mediates the E6-AP-dependent ubiquitination of p53. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  J. Reddy,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the ultrastructural changes in rat liver induced by the peroxisome proliferator SaH 42-348 , 1976, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  K. Okumoto,et al.  AWP1/ZFAND6 Functions in Pex5 Export by Interacting with Cys‐Monoubiquitinated Pex5 and Pex6 AAA ATPase , 2012, Traffic.

[50]  M. Fransen,et al.  Ubiquitination of Mammalian Pex5p, the Peroxisomal Import Receptor* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Ubiquitin signals autophagic degradation of cytosolic proteins and peroxisomes , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[53]  B. Pan,et al.  The unique N terminus of the UbcH10 E2 enzyme controls the threshold for APC activation and enhances checkpoint regulation of the APC. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[54]  W. Schliebs,et al.  Peroxisomal matrix protein import: the transient pore model , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[55]  W. Schliebs,et al.  The peroxisomal importomer constitutes a large and highly dynamic pore , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[56]  S. Subramani,et al.  Pexophagy: The Selective Degradation of Peroxisomes , 2012, International journal of cell biology.

[57]  Jussi Timonen,et al.  Protein Diffusion in Mammalian Cell Cytoplasm , 2011, PloS one.

[58]  A. Motley,et al.  Pex3-anchored Atg36 tags peroxisomes for degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[59]  K. Okumoto,et al.  New insights into dynamic and functional assembly of the AAA peroxins, Pex1p and Pex6p, and their membrane receptor Pex26p in shuttling of PTS1-receptor Pex5p during peroxisome biogenesis. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[60]  S. Tamura,et al.  The pathogenic peroxin Pex26p recruits the Pex1p–Pex6p AAA ATPase complexes to peroxisomes , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[61]  Y. Fujiki,et al.  The peroxin Pex14p is involved in LC3-dependent degradation of mammalian peroxisomes. , 2008, Experimental cell research.

[62]  Harald W. Platta,et al.  The AAA peroxins Pex1p and Pex6p function as dislocases for the ubiquitinated peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p. , 2008, Biochemical Society transactions.

[63]  B. Warscheid,et al.  Members of the E2D (UbcH5) Family Mediate the Ubiquitination of the Conserved Cysteine of Pex5p, the Peroxisomal Import Receptor* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[64]  M. Fransen,et al.  PEX5 Protein Binds Monomeric Catalase Blocking Its Tetramerization and Releases It upon Binding the N-terminal Domain of PEX14* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[65]  Jorge E Azevedo,et al.  The Energetics of Pex5p-mediated Peroxisomal Protein Import* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[66]  H. Moser,et al.  Mutations in the PTS1 receptor gene, PXR1, define complementation group 2 of the peroxisome biogenesis disorders , 1995, Nature Genetics.