Sorafenib for Older Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma: Subset Analysis From a Randomized Trial

Background The perception that older cancer patients may be at higher risk than younger patients of toxic effects from cancer therapy but may obtain less clinical benefit from it may be based on the underrepresentation of older patients in clinical trials and the known toxic effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. It is not known how older patients respond to targeted therapy. Methods This retrospective subgroup analysis of data from the phase 3, randomized Treatment Approach in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial examined the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in older (age ≥70 years, n = 115) and younger patients (age <70 years, n = 787) who received treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patient demographics and progression-free survival were recorded. Best tumor response, clinical benefit rate (defined as complete response plus partial response plus stable disease), time to self-reported health status deterioration, and toxic effects were assessed by descriptive statistics. Health-related quality of life was assessed with a Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to summarize time-to-event data. Results Median progression-free survival was similar in sorafenib-treated younger patients (23.9 weeks; hazard ratio [HR] for progression compared with placebo = 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47 to 0.66) and older patients (26.3 weeks; HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.69). Clinical benefit rates among younger and older sorafenib-treated patients were also similar (83.5% and 84.3%, respectively) and were superior to those of younger and older placebo-treated patients (53.8% and 62.2%, respectively). Adverse events were predictable and manageable regardless of age. Sorafenib treatment delayed the time to self-reported health status deterioration among both older patients (121 days with sorafenib vs 85 days with placebo; HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.43 to 1.03) and younger patients (90 days with sorafenib vs 52 days with placebo; HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.81) and improved quality of life over that time. Conclusions Among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sorafenib treatment, outcomes of older (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients were similar.

[1]  P. Brennan,et al.  The epidemiology of bladder and kidney cancer , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

[2]  Apurva A Desai,et al.  Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Loren Lipworth,et al.  Epidemiologic aspects of renal cell carcinoma. , 2006, Seminars in oncology.

[4]  T. Roskams,et al.  Emerging role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced renal cell cancer: a review. , 2006, Annals of Oncology.

[5]  W. Bro,et al.  Development and validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI). , 2006, The journal of supportive oncology.

[6]  M. Huszar,et al.  Efficacy of anti-angiogenic treatment of tumors in old versus young mice , 2006, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

[7]  G. Pond,et al.  Evaluation of Adverse Events Experienced by Older Patients Participating in Studies of Molecularly Targeted Agents Alone or in Combination , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  J. Atzpodien,et al.  Age does not impair the efficacy of immunochemotherapy in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma. , 2005, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[9]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[10]  D. Auclair,et al.  BAY 43-9006 Exhibits Broad Spectrum Oral Antitumor Activity and Targets the RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway and Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Involved in Tumor Progression and Angiogenesis , 2004, Cancer Research.

[11]  Tim Eisen,et al.  Kinase Inhibition with BAY 43–9006 in Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  L. Siu,et al.  Enrollment of older patients in cancer treatment trials in Canada: why is age a barrier? , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  E. Neulander,et al.  Influence of Age on the Prognosis of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) , 2002, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[14]  J. Crawford,et al.  Survey of oncologists' perceptions of barriers to accrual of older patients with breast carcinoma to clinical trials , 2002, Cancer.

[15]  L. Balducci,et al.  A case for geriatric oncology. , 2002, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  David Cella,et al.  Cisplatin-based therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: implications of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 5592, a randomized trial. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  C. Coltman,et al.  Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  A. Rüfer,et al.  The presentation, treatment and outcome of renal cell carcinoma in old age. , 1999, Age and ageing.

[20]  A. Passaniti,et al.  Altered angiogenesis underlying age-dependent changes in tumor growth. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  D. Tulsky,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Oncologists' reluctance to accrue patients onto clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.