First clinical investigation of a 4D maximum likelihood reconstruction for 4D PET-based treatment verification in ion beam therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In clinical applications of Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-based treatment verification in ion beam therapy (PT-PET), detection and interpretation of inconsistencies between Measured PET and Expected PET are mostly limited by Measured PET noise, due to low count statistics, and by Expected PET bias, especially due to inaccurate washout modelling in off-line implementations. In this work, a recently proposed 4D Maximum Likelihood (ML) reconstruction algorithm which considers Measured PET and Expected PET as two different motion phases of a 4D dataset is assessed on clinical 4D PET-CT datasets acquired after carbon ion therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS The 4D ML reconstruction algorithm estimates: (1) Measured PET of enhanced image quality with respect to the conventional Measured PET, thanks to the exploitation of Expected PET; (2) the deformation field mapping the Expected PET onto the Measured PET as a measure of the occurred displacements. RESULTS Results demonstrate the desired sensitivity to inconsistencies due to breathing motion and/or setup modification, robustness to noise in different count statistics scenarios, but a limited sensitivity to Expected PET washout inaccuracy. CONCLUSIONS The 4D ML reconstruction algorithm supports clinical 4D PT-PET in ion beam therapy. The limited sensitivity to washout inaccuracy can be detected and potentially overcome.

[1]  W Enghardt,et al.  On the feasibility of automatic detection of range deviations from in-beam PET data. , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  J. Debus,et al.  Analysis of metabolic washout of positron emitters produced during carbon ion head and neck radiotherapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[3]  Oliver Jäkel,et al.  Particle therapy at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT) - Integrated research-driven university-hospital-based radiation oncology service in Heidelberg, Germany. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Attenuation and scatter correction for in-beam positron emission tomography monitoring of tumour irradiations with heavy ions. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Initial clinical evaluation of PET-based ion beam therapy monitoring under consideration of organ motion. , 2016, Medical physics.

[7]  J. Debus,et al.  The application of PET to quality assurance of heavy-ion tumor therapy , 1999, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[8]  Julia Bauer,et al.  Hypofractionated carbon ion therapy delivered with scanned ion beams for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma – feasibility and clinical response , 2013, Radiation Oncology.

[9]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Clinical application of in-room positron emission tomography for in vivo treatment monitoring in proton radiation therapy. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  Joint image and motion reconstruction for PET using a B-spline motion model , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  G. Fakhri,et al.  Monitoring proton therapy with PET. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring. , 2015, Medical physics.

[13]  H Paganetti,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the physical potential of proton beam range verification with PET/CT , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Jürgen Hesser,et al.  A deconvolution approach for PET-based dose reconstruction in proton radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  V. Rosso,et al.  A dose determination procedure by PET monitoring in proton therapy , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[16]  Georges El Fakhri,et al.  Proton Therapy Verification with PET Imaging , 2013, Theranostics.

[17]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Clinical evaluation of 4D PET motion compensation strategies for treatment verification in ion beam therapy , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  E De Bernardi,et al.  ML segmentation strategies for object interference compensation in FDG-PET lesion quantification. , 2010, Methods of information in medicine.

[19]  V. Vlachoudis,et al.  The FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for High Energy and Medical Applications , 2014 .

[20]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Vision 20/20: Positron emission tomography in radiation therapy planning, delivery, and monitoring. , 2015, Medical physics.

[21]  Julia Bauer,et al.  Clinical investigations of a 4D ML reconstruction strategy for PET-based treatment verification in ion beam therapy , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[22]  K Parodi,et al.  Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  E. De Bernardi,et al.  4D ML reconstruction as a tool for volumetric PET-based treatment verification in ion beam radiotherapy. , 2016, Medical physics.

[24]  Julia Bauer,et al.  Regional MLEM reconstruction strategy for PET-based treatment verification in ion beam radiotherapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Katia Parodi,et al.  A filtering approach based on Gaussian–powerlaw convolutions for local PET verification of proton radiotherapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Implementation and initial clinical experience of offline PET/CT-based verification of scanned carbon ion treatment. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  W. Birkfellner,et al.  Automated evaluation of setup errors in carbon ion therapy using PET: feasibility study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[29]  C Bert,et al.  Experimental investigation of irregular motion impact on 4D PET-based particle therapy monitoring. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  A. Ferrari,et al.  FLUKA: A Multi-Particle Transport Code , 2005 .

[31]  J Fan,et al.  Absolute dose reconstruction in proton therapy using PET imaging modality: feasibility study , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  H Paganetti,et al.  Systematic analysis of biological and physical limitations of proton beam range verification with offline PET/CT scans , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  H Paganetti,et al.  Extension and validation of an analytical model for in vivo PET verification of proton therapy—a phantom and clinical study , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Antony Lomax,et al.  In vivo proton range verification: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Carlo Cavedon,et al.  Optimized PET Imaging for 4D Treatment Planning in Radiotherapy: the Virtual 4D PET Strategy , 2015, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[36]  K Parodi,et al.  Experimental verification of a 4D MLEM reconstruction algorithm used for in-beam PET measurements in particle therapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Using statistical measures for automated comparison of in-beam PET data. , 2012, Medical physics.

[38]  Katia Parodi,et al.  The modelling of positron emitter production and PET imaging during carbon ion therapy , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  A sinogram warping strategy for pre-reconstruction 4D PET optimization , 2015, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[40]  Chiara Gianoli,et al.  Proposal of a 4D ML reconstruction strategy for PET-based treatment verification in ion beam radiotherapy , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[41]  M. Durante.  Charged particles for liver cancer. , 2015, Annals of translational medicine.

[42]  K. Parodi,et al.  Geometrical interpretation of TOF PET raw data in commercial PET-CT scanner for SNR optimization , 2016 .

[43]  H Paganetti,et al.  Automation and uncertainty analysis of a method for in-vivo range verification in particle therapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  PET-CT scanner characterization for PET raw data use in biomedical research , 2014, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[45]  Katia Parodi,et al.  PET monitoring of hadrontherapy , 2012 .

[46]  K. Parodi,et al.  4D offline PET-based treatment verification in scanned ion beam therapy: a phantom study , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.