Knowledge-based Correction of Flash-lag Illusion

A flash is perceived to lag spatially behind a moving object even when the two retinal images are physically aligned (flash-lag effect, FLE). Here we show that this robust illusion can be diminished by a knowledge of letters in the observer's brain. When moving and flashed segments in the FLE made the shape of a Kanji letter (ideographic characters used in Japan), the magnitude of the illusory lag perceived by Japanese subjects was significantly reduced compared to when conventional geometric (nonletter) segments were used. This diminishment was not observed when a pseudo-Kanji letter was presented to Japanese subjects or when non-Japanese English-speakers (who do not have a knowledge of Kanji) saw a real Kanji letter, indicating that the reduction in the FLE was induced by a retrieval of the knowledge (shapes of letters) stored in the observer's brain. Furthermore, measurements of neural activities by magnetoencephalography showed that the initial brain response, in which the effect of the knowledge became evident, occurred as early as 160 msec after the appearance of the flashed segment. These results demonstrated a substantial influence of knowledge on the flash-lag illusion and further suggest a rapid response of the knowledge-based perceptual pathway in the human brain.

[1]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Cyclopean flash-lag illusion , 2006, Vision Research.

[2]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[3]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Perona,et al.  Where is the sun? , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Visual Transients Reveal the Veridical Position of a Moving Object , 2006, Perception.

[7]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Perceptual organization of moving stimuli modulates the flash-lag effect. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  R. Gregory,et al.  Knowledge in perception and illusion. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[12]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Alex Martin,et al.  Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  W. Schneider,et al.  Perceptual Knowledge Retrieval Activates Sensory Brain Regions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Nijhawan,et al.  Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Marcus Vinícius C Baldo,et al.  The Modulation of the Flash-Lag Effect by Voluntary Attention , 2004, Perception.

[17]  R. Hari,et al.  Viewing Lip Forms Cortical Dynamics , 2002, Neuron.

[18]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization , 2004, Vision Research.

[19]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[20]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Time by Neurons in the Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[21]  Gopathy Purushothaman,et al.  Moving ahead through differential visual latency , 1998, Nature.

[22]  D. Mackay.  Perceptual Stability of a Stroboscopically Lit Visual Field containing Self-Luminous Objects , 1958, Nature.

[23]  M. Lappe,et al.  Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Cortical Sequence of Word Perception in Beginning Readers , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Koji Inui,et al.  Temporal dynamics of neural adaptation effect in the human visual ventral stream , 2005 .

[26]  M. Ernst,et al.  Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  B. Khurana,et al.  Flash-lag chimeras: The role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect , 2006, Vision Research.

[28]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Visual detection of motion speed in humans: spatiotemporal analysis by fMRI and MEG , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[29]  Marco Buiatti,et al.  Temporal Integration in Visual Word Recognition , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[31]  Ronald Peeters,et al.  Knowledge of visual attributes in the right hemisphere , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  G. Mangun.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[34]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[35]  I. Murakami,et al.  Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[37]  C. Price,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Semantic System: Divisible by What? , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.