A semantic framework for modelling quotes in email conversations

Quoting is a common practice in online conversations, notably in email discussions and bulletin boards. Despite many applications that offer special functionalities to handle them, there is no agreement on how to semantically represent these quotes, so that they could be queried and analysed uniformly whatever the original application is. While various Semantic Web models, notably SIOC, have become popular for interlinking, exporting and exchanging information about online communities and their conversations, they do not provide means to model such quotes. In this paper, we present (i) an OWL2 extension of SIOC for representing quotes and (ii) a framework for automated quotes extraction from email archives. In addition, we demonstrate the utility of such formal representation for querying email archives with finer-grained queries and for mining social networks based on the argumentative structure of email conversations.

[1]  Nicolas Ducheneaut,et al.  In Search of Coherence: A Review of E-Mail Research , 2005, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Michael Hausenblas,et al.  mle: Enhancing the Exploration of Mailing List Archives Through Making Semantics Explicit , 2007, Semantic Web Challenge.

[3]  Victor Kuperman Productivity in the Internet mailing lists: A bibliometric analysis , 2006 .

[4]  Judith B. Pena-Shaff,et al.  Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[5]  K. S. Eklundh,et al.  The use of quoting to preserve context in electronic mail dialogues , 1994 .

[6]  Nikos I. Karacapilidis,et al.  The Zeno argumentation framework , 1997, ICAIL '97.

[7]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Understanding sequence and reply relationships within email conversations: a mixed-model visualization , 2003, CHI '03.

[8]  Jaz Hee-jeong Choi,et al.  Living in Cyworld: Contextualising Cy-Ties in South Korea , 2006 .

[9]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  A hybrid approach to Web forum interactional coherence analysis , 2008 .

[10]  Harry Halpin,et al.  Developing an Argumentation Ontology for Mailing Lists , 2006, AIMSA.

[11]  Françoise Détienne,et al.  A study of online discussions in an Open-Source Software Community: Reconstructing thematic coherence and argumentation from quotation practices , 2005 .

[12]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Compendium: Making Meetings into Knowledge Events , 2001 .

[13]  Siegfried Handschuh,et al.  Semanta - Semantic Email Made Easy , 2009, ESWC.

[14]  Eric A. Hall,et al.  The application/mbox Media Type , 2005, RFC.

[15]  Charles J. Petrie,et al.  Semantic Email Addressing: The Semantic Web Killer App? , 2009, IEEE Internet Computing.

[16]  Dan Brickley,et al.  FOAF Vocabulary Specification , 2004 .

[17]  Kuntz Werner,et al.  Issues as Elements of Information Systems , 1970 .

[18]  José Emilio Labra Gayo,et al.  Mailing Lists Meet the Semantic Web , 2007, SAW.

[19]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Email overload at work: an analysis of factors associated with email strain , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[20]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Mapping to RDF Graphs , 2009 .

[21]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Email overload: exploring personal information management of email , 1996, CHI.

[22]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[23]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion , 1988, CSCW '88.

[24]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Social Semantic Web , 2009, Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies.

[25]  Andreas Harth,et al.  Towards Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities , 2005, ESWC.

[26]  Ka-Ping Yee Zest: Discussion Mapping for Mailing Lists , 2002 .

[27]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language , 2009 .

[28]  Françoise Détienne,et al.  A socio-cognitive analysis of online design discussions in an Open Source Software community , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[29]  Bernardo Cuenca Grau,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Profiles , 2009 .