How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Y. Paulignan,et al. An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.
[2] S. Vogt,et al. Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: perspective matters , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[3] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.
[4] Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al. Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.
[5] G. Rizzolatti,et al. The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.
[6] M. Lieberman. Social Cognitive Neuroscience , 2010 .
[7] N. Hogan. An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[8] Frank Van Overwalle,et al. Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis , 2009, NeuroImage.
[9] Luciano Fadiga,et al. Visuomotor Priming , 2001 .
[10] C. Frith,et al. Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[11] A. Osman,et al. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.
[12] Matthew R Longo,et al. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] G. Bird,et al. Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.
[14] Emily S. Cross,et al. Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.
[15] G. Cheng,et al. Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.
[16] Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al. EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots , 2007, Neurocomputing.
[17] T. Shipley,et al. Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.
[18] Katja Fiehler,et al. How moving objects become animated: The human mirror neuron system assimilates non-biological movement patterns , 2008, Social neuroscience.
[19] C. Frith,et al. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[20] Clare Press,et al. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Action Observation and Robotic Agents: Learning and Anthropomorphism , 2022 .
[21] Caroline Catmur,et al. Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[22] T. Chaminade,et al. Motor interference between Humans and Humanoid Robots: Effect of Biological and Artificial Motion , 2005, Proceedings. The 4nd International Conference on Development and Learning, 2005..
[23] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.
[24] Á. Pascual-Leone,et al. Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion , 2005, Vision Research.
[25] Jessica K. Hodgins,et al. Exploring the neural correlates of goal-directed action and intention understanding , 2011, NeuroImage.
[26] J. Mattingley,et al. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[27] Marcel Brass,et al. Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. , 2010, Experimental psychology.
[28] Mark Mon-Williams,et al. Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times , 2007, Brain and Cognition.
[29] W. Prinz,et al. Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.
[30] M. Brass,et al. Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[31] G. Goldenberg. Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience neglecting apraxia? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[32] C. Neil Macrae,et al. The Link between Social Cognition and Self-referential Thought in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[33] A. Hamilton,et al. Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion , 2007, Social neuroscience.
[34] C. Heyes. Automatic imitation. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.
[35] Geoffrey Bird,et al. Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation , 2010 .
[36] G. Rizzolatti,et al. From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations , 2002 .
[37] Marcel Brass,et al. Does the Human Motor System Simulate Pinocchio's Actions? , 2007, Psychological science.
[38] R. Proctor,et al. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: Elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[39] James Stanley,et al. Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] George Anastaplo,et al. UNDERSTANDING OTHERS , 2009, Ethical Excellence.
[41] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.
[42] F. Binkofski,et al. Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI , 2008, PloS one.
[43] Robert W Proctor,et al. Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[44] Matthew R Longo,et al. Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[45] C. Frith,et al. Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.
[46] David W. Franklin,et al. Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? , 2004, Humanoids.
[47] T. Flash,et al. Neuronal encoding of human kinematic invariants during action observation. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[48] M. Brass,et al. The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[49] J. Mazziotta,et al. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.
[50] J. Mazziotta,et al. Functional segregation within pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus: evidence from fMRI studies of imitation and action observation. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[51] L Fogassi,et al. 'direct' and 'indirect' Pathways from Monkey Mirror Neurons to Primate Behaviours: Possible References Subject Collections from Monkey Mirror Neurons to Primate Behaviours: Possible 'direct' and 'indirect' Pathways , 2009 .
[52] C. Heyes. Where do mirror neurons come from? , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[53] Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al. The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[54] C. Frith,et al. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[55] P. Fletcher,et al. Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[56] Cade McCall,et al. Effects of a priori liking on the elicitation of mimicry. , 2010, Experimental psychology.
[57] Andrew D. Wilson,et al. Methodological problems undermine tests of the ideo-motor conjecture , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.
[58] C. Heyes,et al. Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[59] James Stanley,et al. How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency , 2010, NeuroImage.
[60] C. Bradshaw,et al. Exploring visuomotor priming following biological and non-biological stimuli , 2010, Brain and Cognition.
[61] C. Neil Macrae,et al. General and specific contributions of the medial prefrontal cortex to knowledge about mental states , 2005, NeuroImage.
[62] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[63] S. Duncan. Seeing Other Minds , 2010 .
[64] W. Prinz,et al. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.
[65] Jason B. Mattingley,et al. Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation , 2008, NeuroImage.
[66] R. Goebel,et al. The brain's intention to imitate: The neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.
[67] A. Hamilton. Emulation and Mimicry for Social Interaction: A Theoretical Approach to Imitation in Autism , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[68] C. Frith,et al. Action Observation: Inferring Intentions without Mirror Neurons , 2008, Current Biology.
[69] C. Frith,et al. The Neural Basis of Mentalizing , 2006, Neuron.
[70] C. Heyes. Causes and consequences of imitation , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[71] Jason P. Mitchell,et al. Repetition suppression of ventromedial prefrontal activity during judgments of self and others , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[72] Asif A Ghazanfar,et al. Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[73] T. Chartrand,et al. Where is the love? The social aspects of mimicry , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[74] Jason P. Mitchell,et al. Distinct neural systems subserve person and object knowledge , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[75] H. Ishiguro,et al. The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[76] Matt Wallden,et al. Stimulus and response. , 2011, Journal of bodywork and movement therapies.
[77] P. Haggard,et al. Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition , 1993 .
[78] R. Oostenveld,et al. Evidence for fast, low-level motor resonance to action observation: An MEG study , 2008, Social neuroscience.
[79] Christian Keysers,et al. The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.
[80] Cecilia Heyes,et al. Action Preparation Helps and Hinders Perception of Action , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[81] M. Iacoboni,et al. The self and social cognition: the role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[82] G Aschersleben,et al. Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[83] Marcel Brass,et al. Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution , 2009, Human brain mapping.
[84] R. E Passingham,et al. Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.
[85] Wolfgang Prinz,et al. When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions , 2010, Cognition.
[86] M. Brass,et al. Investigating Action Understanding: Inferential Processes versus Action Simulation , 2007, Current Biology.
[87] C. Heyes,et al. Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[88] Cecilia Heyes,et al. Acquisition of automatic imitation is sensitive to sensorimotor contingency. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[89] Heloir,et al. The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.
[90] Marcel Brass,et al. Resisting motor mimicry: Control of imitation involves processes central to social cognition in patients with frontal and temporo-parietal lesions , 2010, Social neuroscience.
[91] Alan C. Evans,et al. Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[92] R. Miall,et al. A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[93] G. Csibra. Action mirroring and action understanding: an alternative account , 1993 .
[94] Ellen Poliakoff,et al. The effect of viewing graspable objects and actions in Parkinson's disease , 2007, Neuroreport.
[95] C. Heyes,et al. Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[96] Jason P. Mitchell,et al. Dissociable Medial Prefrontal Contributions to Judgments of Similar and Dissimilar Others , 2006, Neuron.
[97] Cecilia Heyes,et al. Bottom‐up, not top‐down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.
[98] S. Muthukumaraswamy,et al. Modulation of the human mirror neuron system during cognitive activity. , 2008, Psychophysiology.
[99] Biermann,et al. Observing repetitive finger movements modulates response times of auditorily cued finger movements , 2014 .
[100] Karl J. Friston,et al. Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.
[101] Antonia F. de C. Hamilton,et al. Dissociation of mirroring and mentalising systems in autism , 2011, NeuroImage.
[102] Caroline Catmur,et al. Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.