How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence

Visuomotor priming occurs when our actions are influenced by observing a compatible or incompatible action. Here we ask whether visuomotor priming is specific to human, biological actions or generalises to non-biological movements, such as abstract shapes or robots. Reviewing the evidence indicates that priming occurs for both types of stimuli and emphasises the contributions of both bottom-up (e.g. stimulus saliency, appearance, kinematics) and top-down (e.g. attention and prior knowledge) factors. We propose a model suggesting that although bottom-up features play a critical role, the degree of difference in priming for biological versus non-biological stimuli can be ultimately shaped by top-down factors.

[1]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[2]  S. Vogt,et al.  Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: perspective matters , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  M. Lieberman Social Cognitive Neuroscience , 2010 .

[7]  N. Hogan An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[9]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Visuomotor Priming , 2001 .

[10]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[12]  Matthew R Longo,et al.  Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  G. Bird,et al.  Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  G. Cheng,et al.  Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[16]  Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al.  EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[17]  T. Shipley,et al.  Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[18]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  How moving objects become animated: The human mirror neuron system assimilates non-biological movement patterns , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[19]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Clare Press,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Action Observation and Robotic Agents: Learning and Anthropomorphism , 2022 .

[21]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  T. Chaminade,et al.  Motor interference between Humans and Humanoid Robots: Effect of Biological and Artificial Motion , 2005, Proceedings. The 4nd International Conference on Development and Learning, 2005..

[23]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[25]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Exploring the neural correlates of goal-directed action and intention understanding , 2011, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Mattingley,et al.  The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[28]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Methodological issues in measures of imitative reaction times , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[29]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  M. Brass,et al.  Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  G. Goldenberg Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience neglecting apraxia? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  The Link between Social Cognition and Self-referential Thought in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion , 2007, Social neuroscience.

[34]  C. Heyes Automatic imitation. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Geoffrey Bird,et al.  Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation , 2010 .

[36]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations , 2002 .

[37]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Does the Human Motor System Simulate Pinocchio's Actions? , 2007, Psychological science.

[38]  R. Proctor,et al.  Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: Elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  James Stanley,et al.  Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  George Anastaplo,et al.  UNDERSTANDING OTHERS , 2009, Ethical Excellence.

[41]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[42]  F. Binkofski,et al.  Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI , 2008, PloS one.

[43]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Matthew R Longo,et al.  Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[46]  David W. Franklin,et al.  Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? , 2004, Humanoids.

[47]  T. Flash,et al.  Neuronal encoding of human kinematic invariants during action observation. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  M. Brass,et al.  The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[50]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Functional segregation within pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus: evidence from fMRI studies of imitation and action observation. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  L Fogassi,et al.  'direct' and 'indirect' Pathways from Monkey Mirror Neurons to Primate Behaviours: Possible References Subject Collections from Monkey Mirror Neurons to Primate Behaviours: Possible 'direct' and 'indirect' Pathways , 2009 .

[52]  C. Heyes Where do mirror neurons come from? , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[53]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  Cade McCall,et al.  Effects of a priori liking on the elicitation of mimicry. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[57]  Andrew D. Wilson,et al.  Methodological problems undermine tests of the ideo-motor conjecture , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[58]  C. Heyes,et al.  Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  James Stanley,et al.  How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency , 2010, NeuroImage.

[60]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Exploring visuomotor priming following biological and non-biological stimuli , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[61]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  General and specific contributions of the medial prefrontal cortex to knowledge about mental states , 2005, NeuroImage.

[62]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[63]  S. Duncan Seeing Other Minds , 2010 .

[64]  W. Prinz,et al.  Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[65]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Selective attention modulates inferior frontal gyrus activity during action observation , 2008, NeuroImage.

[66]  R. Goebel,et al.  The brain's intention to imitate: The neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[67]  A. Hamilton Emulation and Mimicry for Social Interaction: A Theoretical Approach to Imitation in Autism , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[68]  C. Frith,et al.  Action Observation: Inferring Intentions without Mirror Neurons , 2008, Current Biology.

[69]  C. Frith,et al.  The Neural Basis of Mentalizing , 2006, Neuron.

[70]  C. Heyes Causes and consequences of imitation , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Repetition suppression of ventromedial prefrontal activity during judgments of self and others , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Asif A Ghazanfar,et al.  Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Where is the love? The social aspects of mimicry , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Distinct neural systems subserve person and object knowledge , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[76]  Matt Wallden,et al.  Stimulus and response. , 2011, Journal of bodywork and movement therapies.

[77]  P. Haggard,et al.  Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition , 1993 .

[78]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Evidence for fast, low-level motor resonance to action observation: An MEG study , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[79]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[80]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Action Preparation Helps and Hinders Perception of Action , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[81]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  The self and social cognition: the role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[82]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[83]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[84]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[85]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions , 2010, Cognition.

[86]  M. Brass,et al.  Investigating Action Understanding: Inferential Processes versus Action Simulation , 2007, Current Biology.

[87]  C. Heyes,et al.  Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[88]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Acquisition of automatic imitation is sensitive to sensorimotor contingency. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[89]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[90]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Resisting motor mimicry: Control of imitation involves processes central to social cognition in patients with frontal and temporo-parietal lesions , 2010, Social neuroscience.

[91]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[92]  R. Miall,et al.  A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[93]  G. Csibra Action mirroring and action understanding: an alternative account , 1993 .

[94]  Ellen Poliakoff,et al.  The effect of viewing graspable objects and actions in Parkinson's disease , 2007, Neuroreport.

[95]  C. Heyes,et al.  Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[96]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Dissociable Medial Prefrontal Contributions to Judgments of Similar and Dissimilar Others , 2006, Neuron.

[97]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Bottom‐up, not top‐down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[98]  S. Muthukumaraswamy,et al.  Modulation of the human mirror neuron system during cognitive activity. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[99]  Biermann,et al.  Observing repetitive finger movements modulates response times of auditorily cued finger movements , 2014 .

[100]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[101]  Antonia F. de C. Hamilton,et al.  Dissociation of mirroring and mentalising systems in autism , 2011, NeuroImage.

[102]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.