Knowledge structure of technology licensing based on co-keywords network: A review and future directions

Abstract A wide array of scholars study technology licensing from different aspects but there is no review literature to summarize the research results. To conclude these literatures and reveal the intellectual structure which can let us clearly predict potential future research, we select 106 keywords from 3761 literatures available in the core collection of web of science in 2005–2016, and adopt k-core of social network analysis (SNA), and Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) to analyze the co-occurrence words matrix and map the intellectual structure of technology licensing by the software Ucinet and Netdraw. Under hierarchical analysis and content analysis, the results show technology licensing research can be divided into four layers including nucleus layer, middle layer, detail layer and marginal layer, and there are four main topics contained basic theory, spectrum band licensing, environment, and education and technology. According to the map, we infer the possibility of adopting multi methods to develop technology licensing research and clearly predict potential future research.

[1]  Vibha Gaba,et al.  A Comparison of Milestone-Based and Buyout Options Contracts for Coordinating R&D Partnerships , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[2]  J. Sandonís,et al.  Research joint ventures vs. cross licensing agreements: an agency approach , 2002 .

[3]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Interpreting the knowledge map of digital library research (1990-2010) , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Yi Xu,et al.  The Impact of Royalty Contract Revision in a Multistage Strategic R&D Alliance , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[5]  N. Erkal,et al.  Optimal Licensing Policy in Differentiated Industries , 2005 .

[6]  Bert De Reyck,et al.  Milestone Payments or Royalties? Contract Design for R&D Licensing , 2008, Oper. Res..

[7]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  The role of innovation intermediaries in the markets for technology , 2011 .

[8]  Songlin Sun,et al.  A Stackelberg game spectrum sharing scheme in cognitive radio-based heterogeneous wireless sensor networks , 2016, Signal Process..

[9]  Neal S. Coulter,et al.  Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word Analysis , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[10]  K. Govindan,et al.  Licensing Strategy for a Stochastic R&D firm in a Differentiated Cournot Duopoly Model , 2015 .

[11]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Optimal Patenting and Licensing of Financial Innovations , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Sila Öcalan Özel,et al.  Exclusive or open? An economic analysis of university intellectual property patenting and licensing strategies , 2016 .

[13]  Regan Koch Licensing, Popular Practices and Public Spaces: An Inquiry via the Geographies of Street Food Vending , 2015 .

[14]  Jiming Hu,et al.  Research patterns and trends of Recommendation System in China using co-word analysis , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Stuart J.H. Graham,et al.  Why Do Start-Ups Patent? , 2008 .

[16]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[17]  Lihui Lin,et al.  Network Effects and Technology Licensing with Fixed Fee, Royalty, and Hybrid Contracts , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio, Part II: Multiuser Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[19]  M. Newman,et al.  Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks , 2008, Nature.

[20]  Peter Radgen,et al.  Too Early or Too Late for CCS-What Needs to be Done to Overcome the Valley of Death for Carbon Capture and Storage in Europe?☆ , 2013 .

[21]  Ashish Arora,et al.  Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Sungwook Kim,et al.  Biform game based cognitive radio scheme for smart grid communications , 2012, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[23]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Make, Buy, or Ally? Choice of and Payoff from Announcements of Alternate Strategies for Innovations , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[24]  Xianpei Hong,et al.  Technology Licensing in a Network Product Market: Fixed‐Fee Versus Royalty Licensing , 2018 .

[25]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Managing Licensing in a Market for Technology , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[26]  M. Mercedes Maroto-Valer,et al.  An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies , 2014 .

[27]  Guo Chen,et al.  Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[28]  S. Poddar,et al.  On Patent Licensing in Spatial Competition , 2004 .

[29]  Zongjun Wang,et al.  Closed-loop supply chain models with product take-back and hybrid remanufacturing under technology licensing , 2017 .

[30]  Sanjiv Erat,et al.  The Pitfalls of Subsystem Integration: When Less is More , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Yi-Wen Chen,et al.  Technology licensing in mixed oligopoly , 2014 .

[32]  Dan Zhao Choices and impacts of cross-licensing contracts , 2017 .

[33]  Debapriya Sen On the coexistence of different licensing schemes , 2005 .

[34]  Eui-Young Lee,et al.  Technology Licensing and the Performance of Firms in US Information and Communication Technology Industry: The Case of Licensees , 2014, KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst..

[35]  Bert De Reyck,et al.  Step by Step: The Benefits of Stage-based R&D Licensing Contracts , 2014 .

[36]  Hadi Sharif Moghaddam,et al.  Intellectual structure of knowledge in iMetrics: A co-word analysis , 2017, Inf. Process. Manag..

[37]  Emeric Henry,et al.  Competition and the Efficiency of Markets for Technology , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[39]  Nicos Savva,et al.  The Role of Equity, Royalty and Fixed Fees in Technology Licensing to University Spin-Offs , 2013 .

[40]  R. Veugelers,et al.  Designing Contracts for University Spin-Offs , 2008 .

[41]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[42]  Christos I. Giannikos,et al.  Process versus Product Innovation in Multiproduct Firms , 2005 .

[43]  Michael J. Meurer,et al.  Business Method Patents and Patent Floods , 2002 .

[44]  Thomas Schank,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Animating the development of social networks over time using a dynamic extension of multidimensional scaling , 2008 .

[45]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  A Survey of Dynamic Spectrum Access , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[46]  Innovative medicines: new regulatory procedures for the third millennium , 2015, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[47]  Jay Pil Choi,et al.  Technology Transfer with Moral Hazard , 1996 .

[48]  Wassim Jouini,et al.  Energy Detection Limits Under Log-Normal Approximated Noise Uncertainty , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[49]  Allen W. Wang Rise of the Patent Intermediaries , 2010 .

[50]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  K-core Decomposition: a Tool for the Visualization of Large Scale Networks , 2005, ArXiv.

[51]  Qingpu Zhang,et al.  Mapping knowledge domains of Chinese digital library research output, 1994–2010 , 2011, Scientometrics.

[52]  Sameer Hasija,et al.  Cost‐Reducing Innovation and the Role of Patent Intermediaries in Increasing Market Efficiency , 2016 .

[53]  H. Herrera,et al.  Profitable Innovation Without Patent Protection: The Case of Derivatives , 2003 .

[54]  Jean Pierre Courtial,et al.  Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry , 1991, Scientometrics.

[55]  Keld Laursen,et al.  Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[56]  N. Gallini Deterrence by Market Sharing: A Strategic Incentive for Licensing , 1984 .

[57]  Ashby H. B. Monk The Emerging Market for Intellectual Property: Drivers, Restrainers, and Implications , 2008 .

[58]  Alan Harding,et al.  Low carbon innovation and enterprise growth in the UK: Challenges of a place-blind policy mix , 2016 .

[59]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[60]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[61]  Aniruddha Bagchi,et al.  Technology licensing in a differentiated oligopoly , 2014 .

[62]  Xianpei Hong,et al.  Technology licensing contracts with network effects , 2014 .

[63]  Sadao Nagaoka,et al.  The incidence of cross-licensing: A theory and new evidence on the firm and contract level determinants , 2006 .

[64]  Brian D. Wright,et al.  Technology Transfer under Asymmetric Information , 1990 .

[65]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  Licensing in the Theory of Innovation , 1985 .

[66]  Hui-Ling Wang,et al.  A co-word analysis of digital library field in China , 2012, Scientometrics.

[67]  Changying Li,et al.  Licensing a Vertical Product Innovation , 2010 .

[68]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Cross licensing of complementary technologies , 1992 .

[69]  Yuval Shavitt,et al.  A model of Internet topology using k-shell decomposition , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.