Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography.

Reliable attenuation correction represents an essential component of the long chain of modules required for the reconstruction of artifact-free, quantitative brain positron emission tomography (PET) images. In this work we demonstrate the proof of principle of segmented magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional (3D) brain PET. We have developed a method for attenuation correction based on registered T1-weighted MRI, eliminating the need of an additional transmission (TX) scan. The MR images were realigned to preliminary reconstructions of PET data using an automatic algorithm and then segmented by means of a fuzzy clustering technique which identifies tissues of significantly different density and composition. The voxels belonging to different regions were classified into air, skull, brain tissue and nasal sinuses. These voxels were then assigned theoretical tissue-dependent attenuation coefficients as reported in the ICRU 44 report followed by Gaussian smoothing and addition of a good statistics bed image. The MRI-derived attenuation map was then forward projected to generate attenuation correction factors (ACFs) to be used for correcting the emission (EM) data. The method was evaluated and validated on 10 patient data where TX and MRI brain images were available. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of differences between TX-guided and segmented MRI-guided 3D reconstructions were performed by visual assessment and by estimating parameters of clinical interest. The results indicated a small but noticeable improvement in image quality as a consequence of the reduction of noise propagation from TX into EM data. Considering the difficulties associated with preinjection TX-based attenuation correction and the limitations of current calculated attenuation correction, MRI-based attenuation correction in 3D brain PET would likely be the method of choice for the foreseeable future as a second best approach in a busy nuclear medicine center and could be applied to other functional brain imaging modalities such as SPECT.

[1]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  S. Cherry,et al.  Simultaneous PET and MR imaging , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  William F. Jones,et al.  Design and performance of a single photon transmission measurement for the ECAT ART , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[4]  L Jacobsson,et al.  Attenuation correction in quantitative SPECT of cerebral blood flow: a Monte Carlo study. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Correction for image degrading factors is essential for accurate quantification of brain function using PET. For the proposition. , 2004, Medical physics.

[6]  F S Prato,et al.  Scatter and attenuation correction for brain SPECT using attenuation distributions inferred from a head atlas. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  C. Kirsch,et al.  Radiation exposure to the patient caused by single-photon transmission measurement for 3D whole-body PET , 2000 .

[8]  O. Witte,et al.  Functional Mapping of the Human Brain , 2000 .

[9]  W. T. Tucker,et al.  Convergence theory for fuzzy c-means: Counterexamples and repairs , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph , 2000 .

[11]  Abdel-Ouahab Boudraa,et al.  Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in multispectral MR imaging using fuzzy clustering , 2000, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[12]  E. W. Shrigley.  Medical Physics , 1944, British medical journal.

[13]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Automated PET attenuation correction model for functional brain imaging. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  C. Bohm,et al.  Determination of Object Contour from Projections for Attenuation Correction in Cranial Positron Emission Tomography , 1982, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  D. Newport,et al.  Evaluation of simulation-based scatter correction for 3-D PET cardiac imaging , 1995 .

[16]  Hisashi Oka,et al.  Acquisition of attenuation map for brain PET study using optical tracking system , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[17]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[18]  D. R. White,et al.  Average soft-tissue and bone models for use in radiation dosimetry. , 1987, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  C. Michel,et al.  Online brain attenuation correction in PET: towards a fully automated data handling in a clinical environment , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  C. C. Watson.  New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999 .

[21]  T. Tomitani.  An Edge Detection Algorithm for Attenuation Correction in Emission CT , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[22]  H Zaidi,et al.  Scatter modelling and correction strategies in fully 3-D PET , 2001, Nuclear medicine communications.

[23]  A Boudraa,et al.  Fuzzy clustering-based segmented attenuation correction in whole-body PET imaging. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  A Schaefer,et al.  [Radiation exposure to patients caused by single-photon transmission measurement in PET]. , 2000, Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine.

[25]  P B Hoffer,et al.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. , 1994, Medical physics.

[26]  Frank Natterer,et al.  Determination of tissue attenuation in emission tomography of optically dense media , 1993 .

[27]  L O Hall,et al.  Review of MR image segmentation techniques using pattern recognition. , 1993, Medical physics.

[28]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  T. Kosugi,et al.  A new high resolution PET scanner dedicated to brain research , 2001 .

[30]  S. Cherry,et al.  Combining anatomy and function: the path to true image fusion , 2001, European Radiology.

[31]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[33]  A. V. Bronnikov,et al.  Reconstruction of attenuation map using discrete consistency conditions , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  S. Siegel,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a calculated attenuation correction for PET , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[35]  S. Cherry,et al.  A study of artefacts in simultaneous PET and MR imaging using a prototype MR compatible PET scanner. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.