Residue 81 confers a restricted C-terminal peptide binding motif in HLA-B*44:09

Knowledge about the magnitude of individual polymorphism is a critical part in understanding the complexity of comprehensive mismatching. HLA-B*44:09 differs from the highly frequent HLA-B*44:02 allele by amino acid exchanges at residues 77, 80, 81, 82 and 83. We aimed to identify the magnitude of these mismatches on the features of HLA-B*44:09 bound peptides since residues 77, 80 and 81 comprise part of the F pocket which determines sequence specificity at the pΩ position of the peptide. Using soluble HLA technology we determined >200 individual (nonduplicate) self-peptides from HLA-B*44:09 and compared their features with that of the published peptide features of HLA-B*44:02. Both alleles illustrate an anchor motif of E at p2. In contrast to the C-terminal peptide binding motif of B*44:02 (W, F, Y or L), B*44:09-derived peptides are restricted predominantly to L or F. The source of peptides for both alleles is identical (LCL 721.221 cells) allowing us to identify 23 shared peptides. The majority of these peptides however contained the restricted B*44:09 anchor motif of F or L at the pΩ position. Molecular modelling based on the B*44:02 structure highlights that the differences of the C-terminal peptide anchor between both alleles can be explained primarily by the B*44:0281Ala > B*44:0981Leu polymorphism which restricts the size of the amino acid that can be accommodated in the F pocket of B*44:09. These results highlight that every amino acid substitution has an impact of certain magnitude on the alleles function and demonstrate how surrounding residues orchestrate peptide specificity.

[1]  C. Barnstable,et al.  Monoclonal Antibodies for Analysis of the HLA System , 1979, Immunological reviews.

[2]  James McCluskey,et al.  Constraints within major histocompatibility complex class I restricted peptides: Presentation and consequences for T-cell recognition , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  D. Wiley,et al.  Refined structure of the human histocompatibility antigen HLA-A2 at 2.6 A resolution. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  B. Suarez-Alvarez,et al.  HLA-B27 polymorphism at position 116 critically influences the association with TAP/tapasin, intracellular trafficking and conformational homodimers formation. , 2009, Molecular immunology.

[5]  James McCluskey,et al.  T cell allorecognition via molecular mimicry. , 2009, Immunity.

[6]  P. Cano,et al.  Mismatches outside exons 2 and 3 do not alter the peptide motif of the allele group B*44:02P. , 2011, Human immunology.

[7]  G. Chelvanayagam.  A roadmap for HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C peptide binding specificities , 1996, Immunogenetics.

[8]  Nebojsa Jojic,et al.  Extensive HLA class I allele promiscuity among viral CTL epitopes , 2007, European journal of immunology.

[9]  S. Yang,et al.  Bone marrow-allograft rejection by T lymphocytes recognizing a single amino acid difference in HLA-B44. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Masato Ishikawa,et al.  MASCOT: multiple alignment system for protein sequences based on three- way dynamic programming , 1993, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[11]  P. Cresswell,et al.  HLA-B27-restricted antigen presentation in the absence of tapasin reveals polymorphism in mechanisms of HLA class I peptide loading. , 1998, Immunity.

[12]  R. Blasczyk,et al.  Position 156 influences the peptide repertoire and tapasin dependency of human leukocyte antigen B*44 allotypes , 2012, Haematologica.

[13]  R. Blasczyk,et al.  Polymorphism between HLA-A*0301 and A*0302 located outside the pocket F alters the PΩ peptide motif. , 2010, Tissue antigens.

[14]  Position 45 influences the peptide binding motif of HLA-B*44:08 , 2012, Immunogenetics.

[15]  I. Hoof,et al.  HLA class I allele promiscuity revisited , 2011, Immunogenetics.

[16]  R. Blasczyk,et al.  The composition of the F pocket in HLA-A*74 generates C-terminal promiscuity among its bound peptides. , 2011, Tissue antigens.

[17]  D. DeLuca,et al.  Amino acid 95 causes strong alteration of peptide position PΩ in HLA-B*41 variants , 2007, Immunogenetics.

[18]  A. Seltsam,et al.  A single amino-acid polymorphism in pocket A of HLA-A*6602 alters the auxiliary anchors compared with HLA-A*6601 ligands , 2004, Immunogenetics.

[19]  Nina Hillen,et al.  Essential differences in ligand presentation and T cell epitope recognition among HLA molecules of the HLA‐B44 supertype , 2008, European journal of immunology.

[20]  C. Barnstable,et al.  Production of monoclonal antibodies to group A erythrocytes, HLA and other human cell surface antigens-new tools for genetic analysis , 1978, Cell.

[21]  J. Trowsdale,et al.  Proteasome and class I antigen processing and presentation , 2004, Molecular Biology Reports.

[22]  James McCluskey,et al.  A Naturally Selected Dimorphism within the HLA-B44 Supertype Alters Class I Structure, Peptide Repertoire, and T Cell Recognition , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Differential quantitative analysis of MHC ligands by mass spectrometry using stable isotope labeling , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.