Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with use of novel patient-specific resurfacing implants and personalized jigs.

This paper describes the surgical technique with a patient-specific resurfacing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The patient-specific implant is currently designed on the basis of data from preoperative computed tomography. The implant is provided with a set of patient-specific, disposable cutting jigs. Biomechanical and anatomic axes are factored into jigs from a scan obtained through the hip, knee, and ankle, effectively achieving pre-navigation of the cut planes without the need for a navigation system. The surgical technique is reduced to five simple, reproducible steps. After removing the articular cartilage, the knee is balanced to determine the correct amount of tibial resection; this is followed by femoral preparation, verification of balancing and tibial preparation, and trial and cementing of the implant. The introduction of personalized three-dimensional image-derived resurfacing implants, as well as personalized single-use instrumentation, has the potential to change the common surgical practice of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patient-specific resurfacing implants enable a femoral bone-preserving approach and enhance cortical bone support on the tibia, overcoming critical design limitations of commercial off-the-shelf implants. Patient-specific resurfacing implants can restore normal anatomy, the position of the joint line, and normal joint function, with the potential to result in more normal knee kinematics.

[1]  Joanne B. Adams,et al.  Early Failure of Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated with Obesity , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  Donald W Pennington,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger surgical technique , 2004 .

[3]  O. B. Tabor Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  Donald W Pennington,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  K. Vince,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: new indications, more complications? , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  J. Repicci,et al.  Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. , 2002, The journal of knee surgery.

[7]  D. Warwick,et al.  Incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism after 1,390 knee arthroplasties without routine prophylactic anticoagulation, except in high-risk cases. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  H. Cameron,et al.  A comparison of unicompartmental knee replacement with total knee replacement. , 1988, Orthopaedic review.

[9]  J. Newman,et al.  Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  P Cartier,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  L. S. Matthews,et al.  The mechanical properties of human tibial trabecular bone as a function of metaphyseal location. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  R. Scott,et al.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Long-Term Results , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  C. Hu,et al.  A comparison of unicompartmental knee replacement with total knee replacement. , 1988, Orthopaedic review.

[14]  J. Wan,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term success in middle-age and obese patients. , 2005, Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances.

[15]  David FitzPatrick,et al.  Statistical design of unicompartmental tibial implants and comparison with current devices. , 2007, The Knee.

[16]  L. Engesaeter,et al.  The economic impact of failures in total hip replacement surgery: 28,997 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1987-1993. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  C. Ackroyd Medial compartment arthroplasty of the knee. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  S. Stern,et al.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  Joanne B. Adams,et al.  Obesity, young age, patellofemoral disease, and anterior knee pain: identifying the unicondylar arthroplasty patient in the United States. , 2007, Orthopedics.

[20]  R. Scott,et al.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  Daniel L Riddle,et al.  Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  J. Aubaniac,et al.  Modern Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Cement: A Three to Ten-Year Follow-up Study , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  D W Murray,et al.  The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.