A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness.

The authors develop and test theoretical extensions of the relationships of task conflict, relationship conflict, and 2 dimensions of team effectiveness (performance and team-member satisfaction) among 2 samples of work teams in Taiwan and Indonesia. Findings show that relationship conflict moderates the task conflict-team performance relationship. Specifically, the relationship is curvilinear in the shape of an inverted U when relationship conflict is low, but the relationship is linear and negative when relationship conflict is high. The results for team-member satisfaction are more equivocal, but the findings provide some evidence that relationship conflict exacerbates the negative relationship between task conflict and team-member satisfaction.

[1]  Eugene T. Gendlin,et al.  Process Model , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[2]  J. Farh,et al.  Task conflict and team creativity: a question of how much and when. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  S. Thatcher,et al.  The Effects of Conflict Asymmetry on Work Group and Individual Outcomes , 2010 .

[4]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[5]  G. A. Kleef,et al.  How Emotions Regulate Social Life , 2009 .

[6]  Otmar E. Varela,et al.  A model of emergence and dysfunctional effects of emotional conflict in groups. , 2008 .

[7]  Claus W. Langfred.  The Downside of Self-Management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects tf Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-Managing Teams , 2007 .

[8]  Christine L. Porath,et al.  Does Rudeness Really Matter?: The Effects of Rudeness on Task Performance and Helpfulness , 2007 .

[9]  Roland Castellanos.  A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups , 2007 .

[10]  David A Harrison,et al.  Withholding inputs in team contexts: member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  C. Dreu.  When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams , 2006 .

[13]  Erin V. Lehman,et al.  Team Diagnostic Survey , 2005 .

[14]  Linda C. Angell,et al.  Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict , 2004 .

[15]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and processes , 2004 .

[16]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[17]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[19]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[20]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  Performance and Satisfaction in Conflicted Interdependent Groups: When and How Does Self-Esteem Make a Difference? , 2000 .

[21]  Onne Janssen,et al.  How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams , 1999 .

[22]  P. Bliese.  Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation , 1998 .

[23]  H. Ellis,et al.  Cognitive activity and physiological arousal: Processes that mediate mood-congruent memory , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[24]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[25]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[26]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[27]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[28]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Building Commitment, Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justice , 1995 .

[29]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[30]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[31]  J. Easterbrook.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[32]  M. Mather.  When Emotion Intensifies Memory Interference , 2008 .

[33]  C. Dreu.  The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: food for (pessimistic) thought , 2008 .

[34]  L. Thompson,et al.  Conflict within and between organizational groups: Functional, dysfunctional, and quasi-functional perspectives , 2007 .

[35]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR CONDUCTING MULTI-LEVEL CONSTRUCT VALIDATION , 2005 .

[36]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  INTRAGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONFLICT-OUTCOME RELATIONSHIP , 2003 .

[38]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  MAXIMIZING THE BENEFITS OF TASK CONFLICT: THE ROLE OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[39]  R. Golembiewski.  Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[40]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF PROPORTIONAL AND PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT COMPOSITION ON TEAM PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[41]  Richard W. Brislin,et al.  Applied Cross-Cultural Psychology: An Introduction , 1990 .

[42]  R. Brislin.  Applied cross-cultural psychology. , 1990 .

[43]  Henry C. Ellis,et al.  The "state" of mood and memory research: A selective review. , 1989 .

[44]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[45]  R. Walton.  Interpersonal peacemaking : confrontations and third-party consultation , 1969 .

[46]  L. R. Hoffman.  Group Problem Solving1 , 1965 .