Estimating Energetic Residue Loading on Military Artillery Ranges: Large Decision Units

Abstract : Sampling experiments were conducted at three artillery/mortar impact ranges at Fort Hood, Texas; 29 Palms, California; and Fort Carson, Colorado, and at a mortar firing point at Fort Carson. The objective of these investigations was to assess the use of multi-increment sampling as a means of estimating the concentrations and mass loading of energetic compounds in surface soils for decision units ranging in size from 100 to 10,000 m2. In some cases, chunks of pure explosives were observed on the surface within the areas being sampled. These chunks were presumably present due to the partial (low-order) detonation of some type of munition during past training exercises, or from blowing in place of unexploded ordnance. Characterization was conducted using 49- to 100-increment surface samples that were collected using a systematic sampling design where individual increments were collected at equally spaced distances across the area. This was accomplished by dividing the area of concern into 49 to 100 equally sized sub-areas and collecting an increment from each sub-area to build the sample. The mass of multi-increment samples collected generally ranged from 1 to 2 kilograms. Replicate samples were collected to assess the reproducibility, i.e., sampling error. Average concentration estimates for the studied areas were used to estimate the mass loading for the energetic substances that were detected. The energetic compounds detected were generally RDX, HMX, and TNT for impact areas where the residue deposition appeared to be mostly from Composition-B-filled rounds. Sometimes the environmental transformation products of TNT, namely 2ADNT, 4ADNT, and TNB, were also detected. For the firing point area, only NG and 2,4DNT were detected. Overall, this sampling strategy was adequate to characterize a decision unit as large as 10,000 m2 at a heavily used firing point. Compositional and

[1]  Kevin L. Bjella Pre-Screening for Explosives Residues in Soil Prior to HPLC Analysis Utilizing Expray , 2005 .

[2]  Charles M. Collins,et al.  Sampling for Explosives-Residues at Fort Greely, Alaska , 2001 .

[3]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  SITE CHARACTERIZATION FOR EXPLOSIVES CONTAMINATION AT A MILITARY FIRING RANGE IMPACT AREA , 1998 .

[4]  Michael R. Walsh,et al.  Distribution and Fate of Energetics on DoD Test and Training Ranges: Interim Report 5 , 2006 .

[5]  Michael R. Walsh,et al.  Range Characterization Studies at Donnelly Training Area, Alaska: 2001 and 2002 , 2004 .

[6]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Environmental Conditions of Surface Soils, CFB Gagetown Training Area: Delineation of the Presence of Munitions Related Residues (Phase 3, Final Report) , 2004 .

[7]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Representative sampling for energetic compounds at an antitank firing range , 2004 .

[8]  Judith C. Pennington,et al.  Evaluation of the Contamination by Explosives in Soils, Biomass and Surface Water at Cold Lake Air Weapons Range (CLAWR), Alberta, Phase 1 Report , 2003 .

[9]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Assessment of Sampling Error Associated with Collection and Analysis of Soil Samples at Explosives-Contaminated Sites. , 1996 .

[10]  Sonia Thiboutot,et al.  Characterization of Antitank Firing Ranges at CFB Valcartier, WATC Wainwright and CFAD Dundurn, , 1998 .

[11]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Coping with Spatial Heterogeneity Effects on Sampling and Analysis at an HMX-Contaminated Antitank Firing Range. , 1999 .

[12]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Assessment of Sampling Error Associated with Collection and Analysis of Soil Samples at a Firing Ran , 1997 .

[13]  Michael R. Walsh Field sampling tools for explosives residues developed at CRREL , 2004 .

[14]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Sampling strategies near a low-order detonation and a target at an artillery impact area , 2004 .

[15]  C. Radtke,et al.  Effects of particulate explosives on estimating contamination at a historical explosives testing area. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[16]  Richard A. Karn,et al.  Distribution and Fate of Energetics on DoD Test and Training Ranges , 2004 .

[17]  Marianne E. Walsh,et al.  On-Site Processing and Subsampling of Surface Soil Samples for the Analysis of Explosives , 2003 .

[18]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Representative Sampling for Energetic Compounds at Military Training Ranges , 2005 .

[19]  Thomas A. Ranney,et al.  Estimates for Explosives Residue from the Detonation of Army Munitions , 2003 .

[20]  René Lefebvre,et al.  Evaluation of the Impacts of Live Fire Training at CFB Shilo , 2003 .

[21]  Sonia Thiboutot,et al.  Environmental Conditions of Surface Soils and Biomass Prevailing in the Training Area at CFB Gagetown, New Brunswick , 2003 .

[22]  Susan Taylor,et al.  TNT particle size distributions from detonated 155-mm howitzer rounds. , 2004, Chemosphere.