Thermohydraulic Analysis of Accident Scenarios of a Fusion DEMO Reactor Based on Water-Cooled Ceramic Breeder Blanket: Analysis of LOCAs and LOVA

Thermohydraulic analysis of postulated accidents will identify system responses to accident scenarios and aid in developing design of safety systems and strategies to prevent or mitigate accident propagation. This paper reports analyses of four accident scenarios of a fusion DEMO reactor based on water-cooled ceramic-pebble breeder blanket. The accidents analyzed, which were selected based on the previous logical accident analysis, are ex-vessel loss of coolant of the primary cooling system, in-vessel loss of coolant of the first wall (FW) cooling pipes, loss of coolant in blanket modules, and loss of vacuum. The analyses have identified thermohydraulic responses of the DEMO systems to these accidents, pressure loads to confinement barriers for radioactive materials. Effectiveness of the safety systems and the integrity of the primary and final (secondary) confinement barriers against the accidents are discussed. As for the final confinement barrier, we show for the first time that implementation of a pressure suppression system (PSS) to the cooling system vault and a vacuum breaker to the tokamak pit is effective in significantly keeping the integrity of the final confinement barrier against the ex-vessel loss-of-coolant and loss-of-vacuum accidents, respectively. As for the primary confinement barrier, we show for the first time that limitation of the number of blankets from which a helium purge gas line collects the bred tritium will be a key technical issue to prevent propagation of loss of coolant in a blanket box through the purge gas line and then suppress the pressurization of the vacuum vessel (VV). For the in-vessel loss of coolant of the FW cooling pipes, further optimization of the PSS or design solutions regarding in-vessel components and plasma control will be necessary to decrease the pressure load to the VV and ensure the integrity of the primary confinement barrier.

[1]  Masayoshi Sugimoto,et al.  Progress of fusion nuclear technologies in the broader approach framework , 2012 .

[2]  Neill Taylor,et al.  Lessons learnt from ITER safety & licensing for DEMO and future nuclear fusion facilities , 2014 .

[3]  Pierre Cortes,et al.  Updated safety analysis of ITER , 2011 .

[4]  Hiroshi Kawamura,et al.  Stability of titanium beryllide under water vapor , 2004 .

[5]  Brad J. Merrill,et al.  A recent version of MELCOR for fusion safety applications , 2010 .

[6]  Satoshi Suzuki,et al.  Development of the Water Cooled Ceramic Breeder Test Blanket Module in Japan , 2012 .

[7]  J. Quelch,et al.  Fusion technology experience at Ontario Hydro's Darlington Tritium Removal Facility and heavy water upgraders , 1990 .

[8]  C. R. Hyman,et al.  MELCOR computer code manuals , 2015 .

[9]  David A. Petti,et al.  Modifications to the MELCOR code for application in fusion accident analyses , 2000 .

[10]  Taisuke Yonomoto,et al.  Study of safety features and accident scenarios in a fusion DEMO reactor , 2014 .

[11]  Taisuke Yonomoto,et al.  Key Aspects of the Safety Study of a Water-Cooled Fusion DEMO Reactor ∗) , 2014 .

[12]  Y. Sakamoto,et al.  1 FIP / 3-4 Rb DEMO Concept Development and Assessment of Relevant Technologies , 2014 .

[13]  T. Franke,et al.  Overview of the design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO , 2016 .

[14]  Hisashi Tanigawa,et al.  Estimation of Tritium Permeation Rate to Cooling Water in Fusion DEMO Condition , 2017 .

[15]  Takayuki Terai,et al.  Development of advanced tritium breeders and neutron multipliers for DEMO solid breeder blankets , 2007 .

[16]  Gyunyoung Heo,et al.  Safety studies on Korean fusion DEMO plant using Integrated Safety Assessment Methodology: Part 2 , 2014 .

[17]  Hiroyasu Utoh,et al.  Thermohydraulic responses of a water-cooled tokamak fusion DEMO to loss-of-coolant accidents , 2015 .